youreavinalaff

No, it isn't.

Most likely of Maltese ancestry. Not many Muslims in Malta.😁😁😁

They would probably not survive. Especially when coming across wild elephants.

"Return them to the wild". Most, if not all, of the elephant at sanctuaries snd in the villages have never been in the wild. They were born where they are now.

Who said that? More barstool chat, I guess. You need to go drinking somewhere else. You hear, imagine, some strange things.

Please, answer the question. Thanks.

I don't recall mentioning lions. No need for me to ask myself anything. I did, however, ask you 5 questions. As yet, unanswered questions.

" animals bred for human enjoyment"? Isn't that a contradiction? Are there no wild horses? Aren't horses historically wild? You do know that the majority of elephants in the shows and on the streets have been born in captivity, don't you?

With many of the forests, the elephants natural habitat, cut down, the only real alternative is euthanasia. Is that what people want? It's not what the mahouts want. Most of the experiences I have had with elephants and their mahouts have been good ones. The elephants have been in the lower Issan area, predominately Surin, for centuries. The Gui people being the original mahouts. Maybe it is the humans that should move away from the elephants' territory. Don't forget to release the buffaloes, dogs, horses and any other animals that might be deemed "domesticated" on the way out.

If you don't like what others write you have choices. Scroll past or stop trolling, or both.

Not abusive at all. Just observations. I really is not my problem if you have comprehension issues.

You haven't seen anyone in support of you either but that's nothing new. You haven't stopped discriminating, blaming and taking sides in this thread. That's why you appear to have selective reading and understanding syndrome.

You have obviously not kept up. I'm not saying there is not a difference However, for entertainment value it's good to watch. No laying on the floor crying over a scratch, no arguing with the referee, no acting like prima donnas. Anyhow, it seems your link points to an exhibition match. "The Wrexham squad was composed of former, current and guest players and the U.S. squad was composed of former players including World Cup winner Heather O’Reilly."

That's men against women. Your link helps in the views agaibst trans women competing with biological women. However, it still doesn't back your original comment in its entirety. It's US too. The England ladies team would give the US mens team a good run for their money. 🤣🤣🤣

No. The events were sporting events.

Common sense prevails once again. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/netball/68767815

No. Not fundraisers. Grass roots sporting events making a profit.

I've taken part in many sports events. Some at sports clubs some in pubs. Some organised by local charities. All making profits for the causes represented. Even my primary school sports day made profits. Maybe your events didn't make a profit because they were organised by an "ass roots" organiser.

Quoting from 2017. Like I said, your views are outdated.

You are the only one. That speaks volumes.

No, it isn't. Even grass roots level sport involves making a profit.

I've not seen any comments on here saying anyone should not be able to compete in sport.

As is everyone else.

A list would be interesting.

Your views, outdated as they are, on women's football drags your comment down.