youreavinalaff

I wonder, can you prove that comment? The " brainwashed" bit and the fact Buddism and it's teachings are "hocus pocus". It will be an interesting read. Thanks.

Your trolling is getting worse. The comment to which I replied said " almost every major move". You might wish to help with the, so far, unsubstantiated list.

You made a comment. All I'm doing is asking you to back that comment up with facts. Lack of evidence popping up on Google can only really suggest you were making it up.

If they really were "major moves" and were mostly to enrich the PM and his family, they'd be easily found on Google. The fact you can't easily find them, proves you were talking from the other end to your mouth. Why would I be Eagar to hear something that doesn't exist?

You said "almost every major move". Surely, if that is correct, they'd be easy to find on Google. Try again.

Interesting. Please share these moves.

Who?

Yes, I just made it.

You used to be good at trolling. Sad to say, some might cheer though, you are losing your touch.

OK. I'll make it simpler. Home in which country?

Home?

So, what you really mean is, Isaan is not for you. Even though you admit there are areas you've never been to. Not they are "boring as <deleted>. I, personally, wouldn't wish to live in a city or spend my days sitting on a beach. Others do. Each and to their own.

555. You are. You share headspace with Bignok.

I will come to meet you. I haven't been to Northern Isaan for a while.

It's about the same distance from Japan.😅😅😅

I do understand you. That's why I've attempted to steer you in the right direction. You didn't follow. Never mind.

Once again I'll tell you, they are not praying to a God. They know that. They don't think any differently. Buddhism is spiritual. They are praying to the good spirits. The rest of your post us a rant that could be about any country. Some good people, some not so good.

The article has links to back up its findings. The links are part of the article. Shame on the Linkman not to adhere to his own principles.

I understood perfectly. The Thais understand too. They know it's nota religion. They don't worship a God.

Pedantry? I suggested you hadn't read the whole article, including the link to the source. You replied "I did read the whole article, hence my comment" The link to the source takes you to a 136 page report. The time difference between your post and my reply and your subsequent reply, was only minutes. You did not read it.

In reference to your first sentence, in relation to my question, you clearly didn't.

It's not a religion. Simple.

That's a good chuckle. Thanks. You clearly are unaware of the roots of Bhuddism and how its evolved in different ways. Also, it's not considered a religion.

I guess you didn't read the whole article. Including the link to the source of the research. Never mind. It's well known you prefer to rely on what the Guardian says.

It was actually the Guardian. Here is a more balanced, less sensationslist article. https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/cps-leaders-welcome-final-findings-academic-report-prosecution-rape