Jump to content

Nickymaster

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    4,563
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nickymaster

  1. The authorities, being the courts relying on information collected by DSI and RTP in their investigations, do not have the right information to charge / convict anyone. That's correct, courts go by law and like to err on the side of caution.

    Lots of people suspect the UDD to be involved, probably via their shadowry MiB, armed militant arm (the left arm to avoid the right from knowing). Alternatively some suggest the Army was involved. With UDD supporters setting fire to lots of buildings and a few provincial halls, all because those UDD leaders shoutcasted for months "to be burn it, it's on me" it seems the Army didn't really need to blacken the UDD more by helping with yet another fire.

    No proof, still waiting for more info. Personally I doubt a new look on the available material will provide any new clues, but you'll never know. One thing should be clear, it wasn't does two just cleared and it wasn't Thaksin either because he was right behind, very far behind his supporters, in Paris shopping or so

    With UDD supporters setting fire to lots of buildings and a few provincial halls, all because those UDD leaders shoutcasted for months "to be burn it, it's on me" it seems the Army didn't really need to blacken the UDD more by helping with yet another fire.

    Yep, a lot of places were set on fire.

  2. NIce idea. Why not put the same cops on to this as are responsible for solving the murder that Chalerm's son was accused of? Perhaps for a modest fee the mystery man Puet can also be found to have torched these buildings. Case solved.

    Correct. Most probably Thida and her friends at the police will sacrifice a few fellow Thai citizens and close the case.

    Justice the Red way!

  3. And people go on about Yingluck!

    He and other Democrat MPs have decided to boycott the vetting panels,

    The "democrat" party - they're like kids, forever throwing their toys out of the pram. If they want to make a convincing argument about something you go to meetings and put that argument forward, not boycott the meeting and flounce off in a hissy fit. How do their electorate feel about their response? Guess we'll find out in the next election.

    When you sign up to this forum in doing so you agree to the terms and conditions already laid out. You can't sign up and then say you don't agree to the terms and conditions. The Democrats situation with regards this meeting they decided to boycott, seems somewhat similar. If they agreed to participate in the meeting, they would be forced to accept the terms and conditions, and would not be given a platform or an opportunity to argue against the terms and conditions.

    Yes, simple as that.

  4. The only people talking about Thaksin are the Democrats and the media, no one else gives a flying fig- if they stopped talking about him and reporting his every breath, then maybe the country could start to at least move on a day to day basis.

    Correct! But how to make Thaksin stop talking/interfering...?whistling.gif

    And how can they stop millions of Thais voting for him in ever growing numbers at each general election.

    General election blah blah coffee1.gif .

    Well, your reply has nothing to do with it. Smutcakes say stop Taking about thaksin, I said that even we would stop talking it doesn't guarantee that he stops too.

×
×
  • Create New...