sanmiguellight

Why not contact each brewer directly and see what they can do.

Favourite place in Swampy airport on arrival, least favourite is Swampy airport on departure especially when its winter in England.

Raylay Beach is pretty perfect aswell, least favourite are the many downmarket nightclubs of BKK.

Englands a good place to live when youre making good money and have a nice bit of skirt, the New Forest (Hampshire)doesnt have any scumbags and is immigrant free, aesthetically its perfection personified for 12 months of the year. Would do me!

England is a popular place to live for 25-50 year old, upper middle class people from German speaking countries. Only drawback is the never ending rain.

Yeah, can't stand thouse immigrants...

There is nothing wrong with them and I wouldn't say, that people from within the EU are immigrants within the EU.

When did Pakistan, Somalia and Nigeria become part of the EU?

Try moving to Slough or Brixton and come back with the same opinion, but maybe you want to live in a area that is polluted with 3rd world immigrants where its unsafe to walk home during the day or at night.

If i had the money an area in England where predominantly English live isnt too much to ask for, or are you lefts fascist globalists going to deny me this right.

Here you go -

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/e...res/default.stm

Unless you like a team in the bastardised league -

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/e...res/default.stm

Could this mean relegation from Brum?????

Pattaya Police Volunteers = Nitwits In Black.

Seems theyve moved on from CS gas after getting away from that one scot free.

Good to see the Brits arent transporting their crims to Australia or the US anymore, now they are flying to Pattaya and Phuket.

But even better to see Aussies are coming out with the same predictable lines.

Anybody seen this thread?

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/Watch-t272801.html

In this case, the farang could easily have a fractured skull, the way his head hit the bar. Yet the reaction of many posters? Som Num Nah!.

Yes i saw that thread and would like to be consistant, there is enough evidence to show that fool started a fight and deserved what happened to him ..... would you have prefered it if the fool had hit the innocent Thai worker and he suffered the same damage (or was it all going to end happily ever after?), if fat fool was to have died or fractured his skull it would have been an unfortunate incident.

As for this boyo ive know footage to give my expert analysis on.

^^^^^

Always good to know Old Etonians such as yourself are making their presence be known here in LOS Sassiene!

Englands a good place to live when youre making good money and have a nice bit of skirt, the New Forest (Hampshire)doesnt have any scumbags and is immigrant free, aesthetically its perfection personified for 12 months of the year. Would do me!

Be interesting to see that prat Platini starts going on about now that Madrid are splashing all the cash.

I think UEfA or the top clubs would only try to do anything if a team like Man City done what they were threatening to do last year ie buy everyone as this would ruffle the feathers of the top teams, but even then nothing could realistically happen as we're under EU law. The only thing that could be done is share Champs League money out more evenly to create competition.

I read somewhere last week that Real only owe 25% of what theyre worth, whereas ManU/Liverpool owe 75-80% of what theyre worth ..... now everyone knows the fans are buying the club for the Americans but it still doesnt alter the fact that in the present situation English teams have far more debt then any others.

Even if ManU were to get bought out whoever is going to be spending best part of a billion quid on them is going to want to make a return on that investment ... so from that point of view ManU, Liverpool will never be able to compete with Barca or Real in the transfer market as from what i can see all money they make gets reinvested into the club.

good to see that sepp blatter is as hypocritical as ever about this tournament.

Sepp Blatter has criticised Confederations Cup organisers for abject

crowd-numbers at the tournament's opening games. "To have half-empty

stadiums is not Fifa," moaned Blatter. "Bring the young people or the

poor people into the stadium [for free], and nobody will be offended

by that."

Cant see the point in this tournament, but thats a good idea from our leader.

i don't necessarily see the point of this tournament either but blatter's talking out of his arse. he's been encouraged numerous times in the past to back free tickets for poorer citizens from FIFA countries and has said no every time only to pass the tickets onto FIFA's corporate partners. FIFA's own commercialism is the reason that there are half-empty stadiums in tournaments.

Yes i cant see how he keeps on getting voted in, surely it'd be in the interest of the 5 major European leagues to stop sponsoring this corrupt idiot and his assocation.

good to see that sepp blatter is as hypocritical as ever about this tournament.

Sepp Blatter has criticised Confederations Cup organisers for abject

crowd-numbers at the tournament's opening games. "To have half-empty

stadiums is not Fifa," moaned Blatter. "Bring the young people or the

poor people into the stadium [for free], and nobody will be offended

by that."

Cant see the point in this tournament, but thats a good idea from our leader.

Well done Sanmig, you've managed to attribute an opinion on me that I had never expressed. If you can clarify where I said he was rubbish then I'll buy you a bag of sweets.

Im thinking the first line of that article about Ronaldo being rubbish was Mr Samuel being facetious, but if you arrived on planet earth last week and only read about Ronaldo on webforums you would probably form that opinion by whats been written.

New Zealand is a nice country indeed. For people in Europe it is and was since decades a favoured dream place to emigrate.

As nice as NZ and its people are its cold for long parts of the year, is boring and too far away from the rest of civilisation, NZ and OZ were always the realistic option for Brits at little bit of effort could easily make it possible.

IMO Monaco would be the best place to live with all that money, and is the place that is far less accessable unless one has a worthy bank balance.

And I've looked online for the info but can't find it. Once again, could you please cite your source. I'm serious -- I can never find any facts like this online.

Try putting the words "crime statistics thailand" into Google, no outside the box thinking needed.

This is the exact type of behaviour that was one of the main reasons my family and I left the UK.

I could accept this but you've moved to the most violent country in SEA one that if statistics are to be believed is far more violent then the UK, where rape is feared by all women.

Could you please share the source these statistics. I find it very hard to get facts about anything in Thailand.

And if rape really is feared by all women in the UK, wouldn't that tend to day something about the violent nature of that part of the world, rather than Thailand? Seems a little irrational of all UK women to fear being raped.

Read the comment again i said in probably an overexagerrating way rape is feared by all women in LOS.

Stats can be found online.

Nothing fickle about my post, more of a lack of understanding on you part. I don't doubt the unfluence that he has had on the team. He has been outstanding for United. I just don't like the way that he has conducted himself over the last 12-14 months, with all this Real Madrid nonsense. As for Skybreed, I'm not sure what you're getting at? Maybe you can explain the relevance to the post before you start insinuating BS.

On the pitch over the last 24 months he's been ManU's best player by far, top scorer again this season despite missing early season not a bad way to conduct yourself, though it would appear him and ManU have been dealing with Real for a year or so, but Beckham was loyal to ManU look at how he was treat. ...... As for the skysports comment, this article in the Mail sums up that way of thinking.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-1...eserve-him.html

Cristiano Ronaldo, it turns out, was rubbish. Glad we cleared that up. It was easy to be waylaid into thinking differently.

I mean, what with three consecutive Premier League titles, man-of-the-match performance in a victorious FA Cup final, two League Cups, a Champions League trophy, the Club World Cup, FIFA World Player of the Year award, two Footballer of the Year awards, two PFA Players' Player of the Year awards, Ballon D'Or, European Golden Shoe, PFA Young Player of the Year, Portuguese Player of the Year and 67 goals in two seasons.

It was easy to misguidedly imagine he could actually play a bit. Apparently not. Apparently he was a preening peacock, a narcissist, a cheat, a liar, a burden to his team-mates and few tears will be shed at his departure.

He was vain, selfish, unreliable and did not do it in big matches. The only surprise, all things considered, is that it took £80million to spirit him away from Old Trafford because, by the sounds of it, Sir Alex Ferguson should have driven him to Madrid for a crisp fiver and a bag of salted almonds some years ago.

Goodbye and good riddance would appear to be the consensus.

And yet he must have been doing something right, because there were 21 matches in the last two seasons in which a goal, or goals, from Ronaldo influenced the outcome, and in that time he scored 37 per cent of all Manchester United's goals in the Premier League.

Indeed, going into the final day of this last campaign, widely reported to have been a disappointment, he was still joint top league scorer.

Ferguson then rested him against Hull City while Nicolas Anelka played, and scored, for Chelsea at Sunderland, beating Ronaldo by one. Anelka did have a head start, though, considering Ronaldo did not even feature from the beginning of a league match for United until September 27.

It is not just Ronaldo's final year in English football that is being re-imagined as a failure. His influence on United's revival is also airily diminished. The fact is that until United found a midfield player to match Frank Lampard's 20-plus goals a season at Chelsea, they were not in touch.

It could equally be argued that Steven Gerrard's impact for Liverpool would have been similarly decisive this time had Ronaldo not kept pace.

Football has changed. The goalscoring burden is no longer on the strikers alone. It was Ronaldo's emergence as a prolific match-winner to supplant United's forward line that altered the dynamic of the Premier League. To dismiss his involvement as the odd good game, or the fortunate bounty of his selfish streak, is to forget the hold Chelsea had on English football when Jose Mourinho was first in charge.

United could not get near them until Ronaldo came good. On April 29, 2006, Chelsea won a second consecutive league title by demolishing United 3-0. The next season Ronaldo found another 10 goals from somewhere and the balance of power swung to Old Trafford.

The positive reaction to his departure is almost wantonly bizarre with many joining Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister - and there is the warning, straightaway - in predicting that United will emerge stronger, as if losing the World Player of the Year is going to make your club more appealing to the best players.

Is it not logical; players who previously felt they were at the best, the strongest, club in the world, might now have second thoughts. It is no surprise that within 24 hours of the bid for Ronaldo being accepted, unsettling rumours around Nemanja Vidic resurfaced. The odds on Carlos Tevez leaving increased, too.

Ronaldo altered the way English football was perceived, and redefined Manchester United's place in it, and no amount of revisionism should cloud that.

The idea that United are better off without him, or that he can be easily replaced, is too far-fetched even for a sport that is right now looking back on Freddy Shepherd's time at Newcastle as some golden age and wondering again whether David Beckham could play holding midfield for England against strong opposition.

The latest development is that Ronaldo will be replaced by Luis Antonio Valencia of Wigan Athletic. And had Valencia not scored fewer goals in the entirety of last season than Ronaldo did in the four days between October 29 and November 1, they could be twins.

As for Ronaldo, judging by the reaction, he is better off at Real Madrid. We didn't deserve him anyway, that useless 67-goal, best footballer you'll ever see at your ground, mate, peacock

This is the exact type of behaviour that was one of the main reasons my family and I left the UK.

I could accept this but you've moved to the most violent country in SEA one that if statistics are to be believed is far more violent then the UK, where rape is feared by all women.

NO ONE, UNLESS IN EXTREME CIRCUMSTANCES HAS THE RIGHT TO LAY THEIR HANDS ON SOMEBODY ELSE.

It seems you've already decided there were no extreme circumstances, if a guy feels he is being threatended or about to be hit is defending ones self extreme enough, in the eyes of the moral elite of TV posters? ..... and dont give me the cod philosophy <deleted> its a real man that walks away from a fight as this isnt always possible in the real world.

Thailand is full of <deleted> maybe just maybe this guy met one of them, but i like everyone on here doesnt know.

He is not a Legend - Legends are players like Ryan Giggs, Bryan Robson, Denis Law, Bobby Charlton etc, etc. Players that played for the club and not themselves. Players that had loyalty. Players that didn't agitate for a move to another club.

He was the main player behind your team winning the European Cup and the Premier League for a few years, for him not to be held in the highest regard shows how fickle and gloryhunting Man U fans are. Skybreed never cease to amaze me.

So british !

;-)

Coming from the nation without doubt the rudest people on the planet.

Good to see the ThaiVisa judge and jury and have found him guilty before any trial.

Ok Ive just been quoted 800bht to use California WoW on a one off basis and 500Bbht to use True Fitness just the once. Call me tight but im not willing to pay 10 or 15GBP to use a gym for a couple of hours.

So can anyone tell me where there are old skool gyms that offer prices in the range of 100-200bht a go ie what i pay back home for a very good gym.

I know of one near to Ratachewi BTS station (get off on the side opposite the Asia Hotel and walk up towards Siam Square, its next to the bridge) but its closed on a Sunday.

I personally enjoy the local cuisine of the country I am in. When in Rome.... I never understood why there's such a hunt for western food while abroad.

Because i and many dont like it, i met some stupid backpacker cow 10 years ago who got all woundup about me not eating Thai food, so if i thought like her it means i can start an argument with any foreigner coming to England who doesnt stick to bangers and mash or beans on toast.

I try to do as the Romans and not try to make their country my own

But the Romans did make many countries their own, hence the bleedin Empire.

Besides my evil foreign food costs a lot more then your Thai food so im better for the Thai economy and create more jobs.

Thais (and other Asians) prefer to be light skinned as darker skin is an indication of engagement in manual labour. Dark skin = low class job.

Same attitude like in the West in past centuries.

No the attitude in England in past centuries and today is due to perceived class upbringing.

Think i will stick on the side of the darker skinned thai as thats a huge part of the population and if there is a race war we will crush you racists heheheheheheheheheh.

Mr Pat if you choose one side in a race war due to the colour of their skin, you cant be calling the opposition racists.

And lets be honest skin whitener or no skin whitener most of them birds in the soap operas are fit as <deleted>!