simple1

Get a life...

Never researched the relationship. Having done so, briefly as doesn't interest me, doesn't seem to anything wrong, normal human activity. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-kamala-harrisandwillie-brownhad-a-relationshipover-adecadeafte-idUSKBN26Y2RJ/

Another false claim and assumption. However, would it not be true you support a convicted criminal, pathological liar and so on - weird! https://www.newportinstitute.com/resources/co-occurring-disorders/pathological-liar-signs/#:~:text=Five pathological liar signs are,when confronted about a lie.

Best trump stays in bed, rather than his never ending stream of lies and misinformation echoed on this forum. Trust he will loose - again - 11/2024 - will be a major breath of fresh air, though likely he will keep on whining until he dies.

Posting factual info which informs of trump's behaviour going back many years - it isn't a one off matter.

I was responding to a claim, not an opinion

Read the forum rules.

Never claimed it was good or whatever; just commented that trump overruled a bi-partisan vote for self centred reasons.

Usual completely uninformed assumptive nonsense. Hopefully you will transition from Darkness to Light when trump is defeated come November.

We know trump employed undocumented workers for a long time until he was exposed. trump is a massive hypocrite. Vice President Kamala Harris's presidential campaign kicked off Labor Day by posting past remarks from former President Donald Trump in which he disparages American workers. Harris campaign whacks Trump on Labor Day by posting his past worker-bashing comments (msn.com)

Actually, yet again, pure BS from MAGA world to deny. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-president-should-have-say-fed-decisions-2024-08-08/

Somebody born in California and raised in Canada with two parents with PhDs does not sound like this. This is beyond cringe. @John Drake. This matter has been fact checked and is misinformation. MAGA people should be ashamed to post utter nonsense.

There is a requirement to back up claim/s with credible source. In the meantime mind your own business

No I haven't read the legislation in full, have YOU? If so why not summarise your objections IMO a person's opinion are worthless without factual backup.

Why?

How about ceasing the BS. Republicans didn't vote as trump was opposed https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/republicans-kill-border-bill-sign-trumps-strength-mcconnells-waning-in-rcna137477

No, Democrats do want open borders, that's just echo chamber trump BS. The link I provided makes it very clear why the Dems object to HR2. As has been repeated many times, trump blocked the bi-partisan bill purely for selfish political reasons, not for the good of America.

You well know why HR2 isn't supported by the Democrats, for those who are unaware the following provides a summary... The bill includes some measures we have heard about—including completing a border wall, changes in asylum standards, and expansion of detention for families and children—along with other hard-line policies that turn our immigration system into a punitive tool aimed at immigrants in the United States. In this piece, we examine three of the cruellest, but less known consequences of an enacted H.R. 2 in the name of “securing the border.” https://unidosus.org/blog/2024/02/08/house-republican-border-bill-is-extreme-and-destructive/

Married for 26 years. Wife has always worked contributing financially to the relationship. As I now have a chronic illness wife supports me. Takes care of me very well.

Some very good content. I understand bias is for the Arabic channel, not so much for English language channel.

India is run by a Hindu nationalist government; they would have zero concern for Muslim suffering in Myanmar. It's interesting some of the armed opposition are Burmese Christians who have had some success, you would think the Western media would be more interested in covering the conflict.

Interesting, there is a report they haven't spoken for eight years. One wonders what has triggered the spitefulness - yet more nastiness. The ground is of course set by trump with his vicious bile towards anyone who disagrees with him - all quite sad.

If I'm not mistaken 'allies' rereferred to NATO forces. The Taliban and Afghan government peace negotiations were subject to a separate process, The Intra-Afghan negotiations. The Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan, commonly known as the United States–Taliban deal or the Doha Accord,[1] was a peace agreement signed by the United States and the Taliban on 29 February 2020 in Doha, Qatar, to bring an end to the 2001–2021 war in Afghanistan.[2][3] Negotiated for the US by Zalmay Khalilzad for the Trump administration, the agreement did not involve the then Afghan government.[4] The deal, which also had secret annexes, was one of the critical events that caused the collapse of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF) intra-Afghan negotiations were scheduled to begin on March 10, 2020. The provisions of the deal included the withdrawal of all NATO troops from Afghanistan, a Taliban pledge to prevent al-Qaeda from operating in areas under Taliban control, a Taliban pledge to not attack United States troops, (note no mention of Afghan government forces) and talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government Some more detail: https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp2122/Quick_Guides/BackgroundToAfghanistanWithdrawal#:~:text=Intra-Afghan negotiations were intermittent,Taliban's version of Sharia law.

You mentioned Taliban should not have attacked the Afghan government as they were any ally of the US. I again highlighted the US Taliban agreement for US forces withdrawal had no requirement for the Taliban to cease attacks on Afghan government forces. Negotiations between Afghan government and Taliban were meant to be a separate process after the US Taliban agreement called the Intra-Afghan negotiations commencing in March 2020. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-taliban-peace-deal-agreement-afghanistan-war

No. Cannot lay blame for a specific incident of a suicide bomber attack. So far as I know don't believe any President has been blamed for a specific suicide attack, except by trump against Biden