The Election Commission (EC) has submitted a list of 11 witnesses to the Constitutional Court in a case concerning the use of barcodes and QR codes on ballots, marking a key procedural step in the court’s consideration. The submission includes both internal officials and external experts, alongside written statements, as the EC seeks to support its position. The court will now decide whether to summon any of the proposed witnesses for examination.
Get today's headlines by email ![]()
The update was provided at 09:30 on 29 April 2026 at TK Palace Hotel by Mr. Sa-wang Bunmee, Secretary-General of the Election Commission. He confirmed that the EC office has formally sent the witness list to the Constitutional Court. Of the 11 individuals named, seven are from within the EC office, including himself, while four are external experts specialising in law and technology.
The case centres on issues related to barcodes and QR codes on ballots, which have prompted legal scrutiny and require clarification before the Constitutional Court. As part of the process, the EC is compiling complete written statements from all witnesses to accompany the submission. These documents are intended to assist the court in evaluating the technical and legal aspects of the case.
Mr. Sa-wang stated that all witnesses supporting the Election Commission are prepared to testify in person if called upon. However, he emphasised that the decision to summon any witnesses lies entirely with the Constitutional Court. This step reflects the EC’s effort to ensure transparency and provide comprehensive evidence for judicial review.
The involvement of external experts highlights the technical complexity of the case, particularly regarding the application of technology in electoral processes. Their input may play a significant role in shaping the court’s understanding of how such systems function and whether they comply with legal standards.
The Nation reported that the Constitutional Court will review the submitted witness list and accompanying statements before determining the next phase of proceedings. This may include summoning selected witnesses for oral examination or proceeding based on the written evidence alone. The outcome of the case could have implications for the future use of technology in elections and the regulatory framework governing ballot design.
Adapted by ASEAN Now ThaiRath 30 Apr 2026
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment