Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Singapore fugitive held in Bangkok over poison plot

Bangkok police have arrested a 40-year-old Singaporean man at a condominium in Bang Khae after finding methamphetamine, chemicals and alleged orders for highly toxic substances made through the dark web.

Joel Ong Seng Yong was arrested on 3 September and the case was announced the following day. Police said Singapore's Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) had identified him as a specially monitored criminal with outstanding warrants and a lengthy record involving drugs and serious criminal offences.

Police said the quantity of chemicals, could in theory, kill many people if used in a targeted attack. They also said they found evidence of a discussion of putting poison in a water tank as part of a mass killing plan.

Drugs, cash and chemical materials seized

Police said they found 3 grams of crystal methamphetamine, drug-taking equipment, 200,000 baht in cash and two mobile phones in the condominium, which falls under Lak Song Police Station's jurisdiction.

Investigators also seized half a kilogram of saltpetre, sodium metabisulphite, ammonia solution, nitric acid, borax and two detonator devices. The chemicals have been sent for forensic examination.

According to police, examination of the phones found evidence that Ong had paid 18,000 baht to order toxic substances. Officers alleged he had bought 20 grams of a poison said to be 10,000 times stronger than morphine, as well as 10 grams of drugs used for animal euthanasia or executions.

However, Metropolitan Police deputy commissioner Major General Theeradet Thamsuthee said there was no evidence at this stage of terrorism. Experts had also advised that the chemicals recovered were not sufficient to make a lethal bomb, he said.

Police inquiry began in January

The investigation followed a report to the ONCB's 1386 hotline in late January 2026. The caller alleged that Ong, who had fled criminal cases in Singapore, was hiding in Thailand, using crystal meth and becoming violent.

Police said the report included allegations of assault and unlawful detention with a sexual element. Detectives spent more than three months tracing him, initially facing difficulties because he had entered Thailand posing as a student and was not then listed on Interpol's wanted-person system.

Investigators later went undercover as tourists in central Bangkok and spoke to an entertainer who said she knew Ong. She alleged he had assaulted her so severely that blood vessels in her eyes burst, threatened her with a knife, and suggested they die together.

Overstay and drug charges so far

Ong has initially been charged with possessing and using Category 1 narcotics, methamphetamine and remaining in Thailand after his permission to stay had expired. Further charges relating to explosive preparation and dangerous substances remain under investigation.

Police said Ong told investigators he had previously been imprisoned in Singapore for drug offences for one, three and five years, and received three strokes of the cane. He allegedly fled to Thailand after another offence in 2024, sold assets in Singapore for around 5 million baht and later lost 2.5 million baht to a Singaporean friend.

He claimed the poisons were intended for suicide because he feared a smaller quantity would not work, and said he did not want to be returned to Singapore.

IMG_1990.png

Picture courtesy of ThaiRath

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

5 September 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Keeenok Powell Silver Member

Keeenok Powell

Advanced Member

Singaporeans don’t usually commit serious crimes but when they do they are belters.

Hunz Kittisak Silver Member

Hunz Kittisak

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Keeenok Powell said:

Singaporeans don’t usually commit serious crimes but when they do they are belters.

I agree. Singapore supposedly has low crime so their criminals commit crimes outside of Singapore.

Recent news of a gang of Singapore criminals arrested in China

kiwikeith Platinum Member

kiwikeith

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, AustinRacing said:

Well he intended to commit suicide. Let him go through with it.

I would say that is an understatement, you don't know what this nutter could do, poiseing water, I think he was capable of doing something that crazy he is seriously insane.

VBF Ruby Member

VBF

Advanced Member

I can only agree with @spidermike007 @Old Croc and @Bangkok Barry in this thread.

I actually said to a friend the other day how at our ages, at least the potentially bleak future doesn't bother us, although he has offspring so has concerns about them.

To cynically and sadly quote the great Louis Armstrong - "What a Wonderful World" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBrd_3VMC3c

cynic1 Silver Member

cynic1

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, Keeenok Powell said:

Singaporeans don’t usually commit serious crimes but when they do they are belters.

Maybe so In their mind! But in reality these type of people are the lowest of low in living a life where they do not respect other lives no matter how old they are. They are spiders/snakes and full of evil and deserve to be exterminated like a bug.

VBF Ruby Member

VBF

Advanced Member
19 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Ever since the age of 20 I decided I did not want to bring children into this world, and now I am more grateful than ever that I'm not responsible for the next generation, that is going to have to witness the utter insanity that is engulfing the world at this point.

Anybody who thinks AI is somehow going to improve the quality of life is living in a delusional parallel universe of some sort. As if billionaire Tech Bros are capable of programming AI to have decency and nobility.

Agree with your first paragraph in its entirety!

As for your second one, yes I agree with it but would add the rider that AI is actually a wonderful tool in the right hands. I use it on a daily basis and it (can) save me hours of standard searching, and that's just one use.

BUT look at it like this: A chainsaw is a wonderful tool in the right hands, a lethal device in the wrong ones. Unfortunately throughout history, good inventions have been hijacked by bad people.

geisha Platinum Member

geisha

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, J Branche said:

Can we all agree one less scum on the Earth will make it a better place.

Looks like prime opportunity for a "Epstein" like security camera failure, and other mishaps.

Looks quite obvious that with those highly dangerous chemicals, and the quantity !!!! they were not intended for suicide. Probably planning a major attack on Bangkok.

Frightening, send him back to Singapore I’m sure they will handle him well.

Bangkok Barry Star Member

Bangkok Barry

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, VBF said:

I can only agree with @spidermike007 @Old Croc and @Bangkok Barry in this thread.

I actually said to a friend the other day how at our ages, at least the potentially bleak future doesn't bother us, although he has offspring so has concerns about them.

To cynically and sadly quote the great Louis Armstrong - "What a Wonderful World" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBrd_3VMC3c

And in today's step towards extinction and reported by Reuters, OpenAI unveiled a new artificial intelligence model it calls its best yet but cautioned that it also sometimes attempts to evade human monitoring, even as the company faces growing scrutiny after its agents breached other companies' systems.

ericthai Platinum Member

ericthai

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, Bangkok Barry said:

I totally agree with you. There is plenty of evidence of previous civilisations that died out thousands of years ago and I see nothing to make me believe that we aren't on the same path. Compare life now to only, say, 50 years ago. Violence is here in everyday life, not only between leaders who declare wars they never go to fight in themselves. Security guards in schools, kids training what to do in case of an attack, and so on. Ugliness on social media. And, for some unfathomable reason, we are spending billions on AI knowing full well it has the capacity to over-rule anything that humans can do to stop rogue elements within it, to not allowing itself to be turned off. It's been very well publicised, but still we continue down the road to self-destruction.

Fifty years ago, life expectancy in America was about 72 years, today it is about 79.

We have better medicine, safer cars, instant communication, cleaner workplaces and access to more knowledge than any previous generation. That progress was largely driven by technology.

Of course technology creates new risks and AI should be regulated and kept under human control. But saying AI already has the power to “overrule anything humans can do” or refuses to be turned off is more science fiction than fact.

Violence, war and ugly human behavior existed long before social media. Technology simply allows us to see every incident instantly. Bad people may use new technology badly, just as good people will use it to cure diseases, prevent accidents and improve lives. Technology is a tool, not an automatic road to self-destruction.

Previous civilizations didn’t collapse merely because they became technologically advanced.

Civilization survives by recognizing risks and adapting to them which is something humanity has repeatedly managed to do.

VBF Ruby Member

VBF

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Agreed. The problem is the totally self-absorbed billionaire Tech bros do not have their hearts in the right place. If they had the philanthropic disposition of a Ted Turner for instance, things might be quite different, but the very programs are likely designed to be malicious and aggressive by nature. And then you have regenerative AI which evolves on its own accord. How can we possibly expect it to evolve in a positive and beneficial manner for mankind, especially when it's being used extensively by the military?

Sadly Ted Turners are in the minority. Although Bill Gates has supported foundations supported by the billions he made from Microsoft. The cynical might say the foundation is a good tax loss but I could scarcely comment 😉

You marked my previous post as "unclear" - my chainsaw analogy was just to point out that however positive an invention may be, if there's a negative use for it, someone will find and exploit it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.