15 hours ago, tonbridgebrit said:

"It's known Kim won't fire first."

And Kim will certainly not fire first. But some people still want to see Washington launch a massive pre-emptive strike against Kim. A pre-emptive strike. A strike that takes place before Kim fires the first missile, even though we all know Kim won't be firing the first missile. 

"And Kim will certainly not fire first."

first of all nobody knows that, we just guess

 

second if his strategy is to threat and threat and he is allowed to use the time  to become a nuclear super power

 

- we will have a ruthless person, a criminal and evil dictator,

a murderer of his uncle and his brother and probably many more

 

in control   - of the world

 

- Anyone wanting that?

 

 

Edited September 9, 20178 yr by sweatalot

6 minutes ago, sweatalot said:

"And Kim will certainly not fire first."

first of all nobody knows that, we just guess

 

second if his strategy is to threat and threat and use the time won  to become a nuclear super power

- we will have a criminal and evil dictator, a murderer of his uncle and his brother and probably many more in control

 

 - of the world

 

- Anyone wanting that?

 

 

I don't see how this threats are winning him any time. Also, he will never become a "nuclear super power".

 

A nuclear power, perhaps. He and his country simply don't have what it takes and time may be one of the critical resources it doesn't have much of. If he makes the wrong move his available time could go to zero very quickly.