On 11/11/2017 at 6:41 PM, Artisi said:

Why, because there was no skid marks. What are you trying to imply? 

That the Van was speeding! that there was no attempt to stop! and if you can't figure that out, than go home!

"Tough action against transport company" - so it's basically a gamble - do I run my transport company on a shoe-string and take maximum profits, or do I take reasonable precautions to ensure the safety of my customers, on the off-chance one of my drivers may be involved in a high-profile accident that's gonna cost me a lot of money.

On 11/13/2017 at 6:14 PM, sambum said:

"overworked driving timebombs just ready to explodoze off at any minute." 

 

Very descriptive word - love it! 

Wow someone actually caught that little wordplay I snuck in.....Thanks!  

Edited November 16, 20178 yr by smileydude

4 hours ago, captspectre said:

That the Van was speeding! that there was no attempt to stop! and if you can't figure that out, than go home!

So you are either clairvoyant or privy to the data outlining the cause of the crash, but that is really secondary as to why and what you are going to tell everyone - wow! there were no skid marks, therefore he was speeding and didn't attempt to brake - bet they will be impressed. 

12 hours ago, Artisi said:

So you are either clairvoyant or privy to the data outlining the cause of the crash, but that is really secondary as to why and what you are going to tell everyone - wow! there were no skid marks, therefore he was speeding and didn't attempt to brake - bet they will be impressed. 

 

12 hours ago, Artisi said:

So you are either clairvoyant or privy to the data outlining the cause of the crash, but that is really secondary as to why and what you are going to tell everyone - wow! there were no skid marks, therefore he was speeding and didn't attempt to brake - bet they will be impressed. 

get a life! it is obvious that you are either trolling or a complete brain dead person! either way I will not waste anymore time replying to you.