Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Fourteen DSI officials face charges in Jomsap case but Dusadee spared

Featured Replies

Fourteen DSI officials face charges in Jomsap case but Dusadee spared

By Kawintra Jaiseu 
The Nation 

 

ee0206bc2dfec25d4335c9330e52167b.jpeg

 

POLICE INTEND to file charges against 14 Department of Special Investigation (DSI) officials as part of the controversial perjury investigation linked to hit-and-run convict Jomsap Saenmuangkhot’s alleged plot to exonerate herself, said Provincial Police Region 4 deputy chief Pol Maj-General Tanasak Rittidejpaiboon yesterday.

 

However, Justice Ministry deputy permanent secretary Pol Colonel Dusadee Arawuit, who has been criticised for supporting Jomsap’s request for a retrial despite knowing that at least two witnesses speaking in her defence had failed lie-detector tests, and Yodmongkol Sappaisansook, a senior lawyer from the Justice Ministry, would just be witnesses, he said. 

 

He said Dusadee was responsible at a policy level and assigned subordinates to attend to the details so he might not have known about wrongdoing.

 

Thanasak said police investigators had completed the interviews of suspects and witnesses and gathering of evidence, identifying 11 civilians suspects who allegedly violated the law in supporting Jomsap’s alleged plot and were already facing charges.

 

In addition, 14 state officials who were involved in the re-investigation of new evidence to support Jomsap’s retrial application have been implicated. 

 

Police will file charges of indiscretion, or failing to perform their duty or fully investigate the facts, against seven DSI officials, while the other seven will face both charges of indiscretion and nonfeasance, or failing to perform an act required by law. They will also be subject to disciplinary probes, he said. 

 

Police would pass the case on to the National Anti-Corruption Commission for action against the accused officials, he said. 

 

The Provincial Police Region 4 will notify the Justice Ministry about the actions against the officials this week and forward all of the cases to public prosecutors, he added.

 

In 2013, the Supreme Court convicted Jomsap of hitting and killing an elderly cyclist with her pickup and fleeing the scene. 

 

Although she was later released early on a royal pardon, she had tried to overturn the conviction while publicly insisting that she was innocent. Her claim gained credibility after a man named Sap Wapi claimed that he – not Jomsap – was responsible for the fatal accident. 

 

But last month, the Supreme Court rejected Jomsap’s request for a retrial and also pointed to an alleged conspiracy to hire a scapegoat to claim responsibility for the accident for which Jomsap was convicted. Police have since promised to identify everyone involved in perjury in the case.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30334494

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-12-22

post-7852-0-83563200-1427896545_thumb.jpg    Justice prevails... but it is not blind.

the only part of that headline that makes (Thai) sense is face

 

 

I honestly don't know what to believe but I am 100% sure that what is being published is way far from the truth

 

Lies and deception in Thailand .............................................never, the most honest country in the world

Someone lost a lot of face - and that has to be put right.

Sent from my KENNY using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

2 hours ago, webfact said:

He said Dusadee was responsible at a policy level and assigned subordinates to attend to the details so he might not have known about wrongdoing.

Thank goodness he has flunkies who can take the fall for him, eh...

It is a pity the supreme court did not allow this case to be heard. 

Regardless of the outcome , there was enough public interest to warrant a reinvestigation of the facts.

Prosecuting all these people for the way that they tried to have crucial evidence heard is a typical example of putting the tail before the head in the Thai justice system. It happens in case after case. That's why hundreds of innocent people are in prison as we speak. 

They are just ensuring there is enough intimidation to make sure Jomsap does not have a single ally to help her. Basically they have rounded up every witness so she will not be able to have any witnesses to help her. They will all be too busy trying to save themselves.

The message is clear. 

If someone is wrongfully convicted and does manage to get out. 

Keep your mouth shut .

It is a pity the supreme court did not allow this case to be heard. 
Regardless of the outcome , there was enough public interest to warrant a reinvestigation of the facts.
Prosecuting all these people for the way that they tried to have crucial evidence heard is a typical example of putting the tail before the head in the Thai justice system. It happens in case after case. That's why hundreds of innocent people are in prison as we speak. 

It would be very interesting to know exactly why the decision was taken not to have the case tried again...

Sent from my KENNY using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

24 minutes ago, JAG said:


It would be very interesting to know exactly why the decision was taken not to have the case tried again...

Sent from my KENNY using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

The court didn't make comment about the forensic evidence and other evidences that supported her innocence. 

It just said they would not take the case because there might have been a conspiracy in regards to witnesses. 

Sap Wapi was not even going to be part of the retrial. 

Imo there was a problem because in her efforts to clear her name, she promised sap Wapi that he would not be charged in the crime. Her intention was to clear her name and get her job back. It backfired due to efforts to protect the driver from being prosecuted. 

There are 2 cases here. 

The first case has not been resolved. And never will be.   

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.