TKDfella Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Pity Lewis Carroll isn't around...he'd probably another book, Alice in Thaiwonderland, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chang_paarp Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 I wonder what would happen if they raided the toad's house, how many watches they would find? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookieqw Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Like it, borrowed watches now returned, well that’s a given - they were borrowed ! it just seems he borrowed more than 1 watch at a time. what gives their ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marley01 Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spidermike007 Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Billions upon billions upon billions of baht. That is what they should be looking into. These watches are worth peanuts, compared to the money that is changing hands, at the top of the food chain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunderhill Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 18 hours ago, Dave67 said: He borrowed watches off, 4 people , thats a good one It would be more credible if he said he had borrowed the watches of a friends octopus thus reducing the amount of witnesses needed to just the octopus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 19 hours ago, Dave67 said: He borrowed watches off, 4 people , thats a good one Come on Dave, you must have heard of "Watch swapping parties". You put the watches in a bag and pull one out. As long as it's not your own you can borrow it for a while. Used to be all the rage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Loh Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 18 minutes ago, Baerboxer said: Come on Dave, you must have heard of "Watch swapping parties". You put the watches in a bag and pull one out. As long as it's not your own you can borrow it for a while. Used to be all the rage. Sure you not talking about “wife swapping parties”, gigolo you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunderhill Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 4 hours ago, TKDfella said: Pity Lewis Carroll isn't around...he'd probably another book, Alice in Thaiwonderland, I'd say Grimm's fairy tales were more apt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TKDfella Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 4 hours ago, gunderhill said: I'd say Grimm's fairy tales were more apt. Well, you could be right but I was thinking of the Mad Hatter and his various quotes about time...'It's always tea time...this watch is exactly two days slow...' etc., Ha! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HiSoLowSoNoSo Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 5 hours ago, Baerboxer said: Come on Dave, you must have heard of "Watch swapping parties". You put the watches in a bag and pull one out. As long as it's not your own you can borrow it for a while. Used to be all the rage. Maybe Prawit came up with an idea similar to carpool - watchpool ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomacht8 Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Why he does not just say that he forgot to declare his watch collection in the value of 30 million. As you can see in the case of Tarit the penalty is only 5000 Baht if you hide 37 million. The judgments for the possession of unexplained wealth are here rather a reward than a punishment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4MyEgo Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 Tick Tock, Tick Tock, one size doesn't fit all, its only a matter of time before "your gone with the wind" old chum ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamyai3 Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 On 1/19/2018 at 1:26 PM, gunderhill said: It would be more credible if he said he had borrowed the watches of a friends octopus thus reducing the amount of witnesses needed to just the octopus. Unfortunately they then had no option but to eat the prime witness before he went off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunderhill Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 1 minute ago, lamyai3 said: Unfortunately they then had no option but to eat the prime witness before he went off. I expect Octo had been consuming too much alcohol and therefore was "legless", it was the kindest thing to do a mercy killing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunderhill Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 On 1/19/2018 at 8:20 PM, tomacht8 said: Why he does not just say that he forgot to declare his watch collection in the value of 30 million. As you can see in the case of Tarit the penalty is only 5000 Baht if you hide 37 million. The judgments for the possession of unexplained wealth are here rather a reward than a punishment. Knowing Thailand I'm surprised they don't actually give a 5000 baht bonus for this instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamyai3 Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 4 minutes ago, gunderhill said: I expect Octo had been consuming too much alcohol and therefore was "legless", it was the kindest thing to do a mercy killing He may have made a third rate witness, but he made a first rate second course... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
(1).thumb.png.bbcb267af4aaf1122a444794828169f7.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now