Bluespunk Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 1 minute ago, Laughing Gravy said: OK I will humour you this time. She isn't an elected member of parliament. if she wants to get involved in politics, stand for a constituent. She was trying to stop a democratic referendum result-that is weak and for me she is an abysmal person. She regularly plays the race card, citing that she can't travel on the underground anymore. She probably never did as she is filthy rich. She stated that she didn't want to have a second referendum but after losing her case she has now admitted she does. She is all about her nothing else. Is that good enough! How did she try to stop the referendum result? Her court case was based on ensuring Parliamentary procedure was followed in implementing article 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laughing Gravy Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 51 minutes ago, Bluespunk said: How did she try to stop the referendum result? Her court case was based on ensuring Parliamentary procedure was followed in implementing article 50. If you don't know then do some research. I can't be bothered wasting calories typing it for you. I guess you support what she did then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 1 minute ago, Laughing Gravy said: If you don't know then do some research. I can't be bothered wasting calories typing it for you. I guess you support what she did then. I have done the research and I know exactly what the case was about. So again, how did she try to stop the referendum vote with the court case? I support anyone's right to ensure that the rules of governance are followed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laughing Gravy Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 10 minutes ago, Bluespunk said: I have done the research and I know exactly what the case was about. So again, how did she try to stop the referendum vote with the court case? I support anyone's right to ensure that the rules of governance are followed. She tried to stop the government triggering article 50. Who the hell does she think she is. If you support that well it says what kind of person you are. Don't bother replying, you won't get a response back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 3 minutes ago, Laughing Gravy said: She tried to stop the government triggering article 50. Who the hell does she think she is. If you support that well it says what kind of person you are. Don't bother replying, you won't get a response back. No, she tried to ensure parliament triggered article 50 as required by law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now