Jump to content

Buying a House for Americans


Wandr

Recommended Posts

I believe it is possible for Americans to buy a house in Thailand by setting up a company.

Has anyone here actually done it? I am hoping to get some feedback on how the process went, what it cost, and if there are any pitfalls.

I will obviously have to go through a lawyer and any recommendations there will also be helpful. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leasehold is safer IMHO, though the land is never yours...but much safer and you are at peace for 30 years (with an extension possible)....and perhaps one day a law may pass allowing a farang to puchase a reasonable amount of land for a individual house.

Edited by observer90210
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also of note as you mentioned 'americans' a 100% american owned Amity company cannot hold land.. 

 

So yes you can do this, as long as you understand you can only be a minority shareholder, IE you can give away 51% or more of a company you pay for, which holds land you pay for.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LivinLOS said:

Also of note as you mentioned 'americans' a 100% american owned Amity company cannot hold land.. 

 

So yes you can do this, as long as you understand you can only be a minority shareholder, IE you can give away 51% or more of a company you pay for, which holds land you pay for.. 

According to the Siam Legal site (link above) a minimum of 51% of the company must be held by Americans. No maximum was specified.

Maybe you are talking about a non-Amity Treaty company?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I will obviously have to go through a lawyer and any recommendations there will also be helpful. Thanks."

    Not so, its  a simple process, many Foreigners have houses in Thailand. I have had 3 plus a condo.

  Go to any Real Estate agent, preferably in a condo project. He will put you in touch with an office (or do himself) usually in the same block that can set up a company for you....

  Around 25,000 Bt. all told, (depends on some variations). You will be named as the Co. Director with 51% ...Thai names for the remaining 49% (3 names).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just be aware that there is a chance - opinions differ - that an investigation will find that you only set up the company to purchase the property. Or a crackdown will happen. Or ...

If so, the land and buildings can be seized.

Chances of this happening ... In Shallah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, canthai55 said:

Just be aware that there is a chance - opinions differ - that an investigation will find that you only set up the company to purchase the property. Or a crackdown will happen. Or ...

If so, the land and buildings can be seized.

Chances of this happening ... In Shallah

That crackdown will happen when there is a crackdown on all the Visa agencies.

Never!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just my personal opinion, but any farang that thinks it is a good idea to own property of any sort in LOS is just asking for problems, and there is no excuse for doing so, given the hundreds of other farangs that have gone before and had it all go very wrong.

Even more unnecessary because it's so cheap to rent or lease here, though leasing also leaves one vulnerable when a rock crushing plant or an all night karaoke opens next door. Even Thais have problems, eg the family that have had a 10 year battle over illegal parking in their drive.

Best, and IMO only plan is being able to move without a problem doing so ( other than perhaps not getting the deposit back ).

 

BTW, I hope they never allow foreigners to own land. In my country families are living in their cars because foreign profligacy in the housing market has raised prices above the ability of citizens to buy.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bkk6060 said:

That crackdown will happen when there is a crackdown on all the Visa agencies.

Never!

 

That crackdown has been in action in Chiang Mai Province for at least the past four years and the LO has been actively giving people six months to change their ownership structure otherwise the land revert to the previous owner.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Wandr said:

According to the Siam Legal site (link above) a minimum of 51% of the company must be held by Americans. No maximum was specified.

Maybe you are talking about a non-Amity Treaty company?

Which is exactly the reason why an Amity Treaty cannot own land in Thailand.  Only a non-Amity Treaty company (which doesn't have the 51% American ownership requirement) could possibly be able to own land and then only if at least 51% of the said company was owned by Thai people. 

Nonetheless, still a very bad idea for the reasons outlined in earlier posts.  Best advice is to rent.  If you really want to own some real estate then you are basically restricted to owning a freehold condo unit which is legal under the Condominium Act (because at least 51% of the condo is owned by Thais).  The only exception I can think of is if you really had a (non-American Amity Treaty) company that really did business in Thailand (i.e., not a paper front company set-up solely to buy real estate) then it's possible the company could legally own property.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe it is possible for Americans to buy a house in Thailand by setting up a company.
Has anyone here actually done it? I am hoping to get some feedback on how the process went, what it cost, and if there are any pitfalls.
I will obviously have to go through a lawyer and any recommendations there will also be helpful. Thanks.
My (American) wife and I bought a small bungalow outside of Chiang Mai, signing a 30 year contract. Frankly, the lease may outlive us. We did have a lawyer draw up the contract which includes first right of renewal. We take no small measure of comfort in knowing we're on a pretty solid legal footing.

Sent from my Mi A1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Wandr said:

According to the Siam Legal site (link above) a minimum of 51% of the company must be held by Americans. No maximum was specified.

Maybe you are talking about a non-Amity Treaty company?

Yes what I am saying is.. The amity company cannot own land.. So in this case is not useful.. 

 

A non Amity company, which can own land, you must give away more than half of it to other shareholders.. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ChristianBlessing said:

My (American) wife and I bought a small bungalow outside of Chiang Mai, signing a 30 year contract. Frankly, the lease may outlive us. We did have a lawyer draw up the contract which includes first right of renewal. We take no small measure of comfort in knowing we're on a pretty solid legal footing.

Sent from my Mi A1 using Tapatalk
 

Glad your happy.. But that 'first right of renewal' clause is pretty much non enforceable. 

 

Its a contractual right not a 'real right' under Thai law. Enforcing future contract obligations is not easy.. If the landowner changes the new land owner is not bound to that contract either. 

 

But as long as your happy with the 30 and pricing its a solid option. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, bkk6060 said:

That crackdown will happen when there is a crackdown on all the Visa agencies.

Never!

 

has nothing to do with visa agency's,   Also, it has happened in the past that the govt has cracks down on Nominee ownership. i think last time was about 5-6 years ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ericthai said:

has nothing to do with visa agency's,   Also, it has happened in the past that the govt has cracks down on Nominee ownership. i think last time was about 5-6 years ago. 

Citation please

 

 Living here for over 16 years the ONLY time there has ever been a "crackdown" on nominee ownership of private property was one case in Phuket , where the governor had the Land Office void the Chanote for a company owned piece of land by the local chapter of the Hells Angeles motorcycle club

 

Hardly a crack down 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Langsuan Man said:

Citation please

 

 Living here for over 16 years the ONLY time there has ever been a "crackdown" on nominee ownership of private property was one case in Phuket , where the governor had the Land Office void the Chanote for a company owned piece of land by the local chapter of the Hells Angeles motorcycle club

 

Hardly a crack down 

There's only been a single crackdown that you know of, these things are not exactly broadcast in the media!

 

I personally know of three farang friends who have been forced to change their house ownership structures in Hang Dong (Chiang Mai) in the past five years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, simoh1490 said:

There's only been a single crackdown that you know of, these things are not exactly broadcast in the media!

 

I personally know of three farang friends who have been forced to change their house ownership structures in Hang Dong (Chiang Mai) in the past five years.

I would have thought that would certainly have made the news as many foreigners have used the "company" option despite the potential problems.  Do you have any links/references to this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Thailand said:

I would have thought that would certainly have made the news as many foreigners have used the "company" option despite the potential problems.  Do you have any links/references to this?

The three people in question are farangs that I've come to know over the years, I did however start a thread on the subject over a year ago where I mentioned the fact in the context of the thread which was about proxy ownership, I believe under the chiang mai poster name. But I'm not sure why you think the Land Office doing its job is a newsworthy item, unless you mean Thai visa forum as a form of news, in which case it did. Perhaps the problem with this aspect is use of the word crackdown, it might be more accurate to suggest that the law is being enforced more rigorously.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...