Jump to content

Porn star offers to repay $130,000 in dispute over alleged Trump affair


webfact

Recommended Posts

Porn star offers to repay $130,000 in dispute over alleged Trump affair

By Karen Freifeld

 

2018-03-12T173645Z_1_LYNXNPEE2B1H7_RTROPTP_4_USA-TRUMP-STORMY.JPG

Adult-film actress Stephanie Clifford, also known as Stormy Daniels, poses for pictures at the end of her striptease show in Gossip Gentleman club in Long Island, New York, U.S., February 23, 2018. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The adult-film actress who claims she had an affair with Donald Trump before he became U.S. president offered on Monday to return $130,000 (£93,550) that Trump's personal lawyer paid her in what she said was hush money to remain silent about the alleged relationship.

 

Actress Stephanie Clifford, who uses the stage name Stormy Daniels, has said the affair with Trump began in 2006 and lasted several months. Trump has denied he had an affair with Clifford.

 

Clifford proposed on Monday that she be allowed to discuss her alleged affair with the president freely after repaying the money.

 

"This is an extremely fair offer," her attorney, Michael Avenatti, said in an interview. "It accomplishes the goal of allowing the American people to decide who is telling the truth after hearing both sides."

 

The alleged affair has become the latest distraction for Trump as he tries to advance his trade agenda and prepares for a proposed meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. It also threatens to erode the president's support among evangelical voters.

 

Michael Cohen, a private lawyer for Trump, has said he paid Clifford $130,000 of his own money during the 2016 presidential election campaign. Cohen did not explain why he made the payment or say whether Trump was aware of it. http://reut.rs/2GnCPZX

 

Regardless of whether Cohen accepts Clifford's offer, the money is the subject of a complaint by the watchdog group Common Cause to the Federal Election Commission. The group claims it is an illegal campaign contribution because of the size and purpose of the payment.

 

Avenatti in a letter to Cohen, a copy of which was seen by Reuters, said the actress would wire the funds to an account of Trump's choosing by Friday. Avenatti set a deadline of Tuesday for Cohen to respond.

 

Under the proposal, Clifford after returning the money would be allowed to speak "openly and freely about her prior relationship with the president and attempts to silence her."

 

She also would be able to "use and publish any text messages, photos and/or videos relating to the president that she may have in her possession, all without fear of retribution and/or legal liability for damages," the Avenatti letter said.

 

The letter also asked that the president's lawyers agree that neither Trump nor the shell company Cohen used to pay Clifford would attempt to block the broadcast of an interview Clifford taped with CBS News' "60 Minutes" programme last week.

 

And it would require the agreement be signed by all parties, including the president, who did not put his name to the previous nondisclosure deal.

 

Cohen, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter, nor did Cohen's attorney. The White House also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

 

The offer from Avenatti came after White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders told a briefing last week that Trump had won an arbitration proceeding against Clifford.

 

The New York Times reported last week that the president's lawyer had secretly obtained a temporary restraining order to prevent Clifford from speaking out about her alleged affair with Trump.

 

Clifford in turn sued Trump for the right to speak about the "intimate relationship" she claims they had, saying he never signed the agreement to keep her quiet.

 

Clifford could be subjected to a $1 million penalty if she broke the nondisclosure agreement she signed. Avenatti told CNN over the weekend that at least 10 people had offered to pay the penalty if she would discuss the alleged affair.

 

(Reporting by Karen Freifeld and David Alexander; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-03-13
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

She also would be able to "use and publish any text messages, photos and/or videos relating to the president that she may have in her possession, all without fear of retribution and/or legal liability for damages," the Avenatti letter said.

This is the part that could make it very interesting. 

 

There's nothing like a woman scorned and I guess even a porn star has feelings.   

Edited by Credo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Credo said:

This could be most interesting, since it is the President who has to sign it and has to agree to what account the money is sent to.   It will be a tacit confession to the whole sorted mess.   There will be no plausible deniability.

So if I ACCEPT money from person XYZ , then think I can make more money because I'm a greedy bitch, and say I will send it back to Trump's account means Trump has originally sent the money. 555555555555555555

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

She's probably raked in a lot more than 130k from the publicity. Openly admitted the whole media coverage has been "good for business". There's probably a few million in the US who wouldn't mind getting easy $ like that. Metoo, yeah!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ilostmypassword said:

For you, the issue is her reneging on her word. For most, the issue is why would Trump have needed a contract to enforce her silence. What doesn't he want the world to know?

 

 I thought it was clear, and you are very well aware of this, that Trump never signed any such contract.

 

So which contract that Trump needed is it that you're talking about?

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, janclaes47 said:

 

 I thought it was clear, and you are very well aware of this, that Trump never signed any such contract.

 

So which contract that Trump needed is it that you're talking about?

I never wrote that Trump signed a contract. Cohen signed a contract on behalf of someone with an alias. Are you seriously suggesting that Trump had nothing to do with this?  That Cohen did this unilaterally? That he paid $135000 of his own? That Trump couldn't tell Cohen to allow Daniels to renege? How credulous are you, exactly?

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

.. and the world is, soon once again, talking about the size of Trump's penis. 

 

If there are photos / videos of Trump naked or having sex, Trump's meetings with foreign leaders might be a bit awkward.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, janclaes47 said:

So if I ACCEPT money from person XYZ , then think I can make more money because I'm a greedy bitch, and say I will send it back to Trump's account means Trump has originally sent the money. 555555555555555555

Surely you don't think the lawyer would have paid her $130,000 for a bit of hanky panky for himself

Dotard Donny is knee deep in crappola with this

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, janclaes47 said:

So if I ACCEPT money from person XYZ , then think I can make more money because I'm a greedy bitch, and say I will send it back to Trump's account means Trump has originally sent the money. 555555555555555555

No, the article never said she will send the money back to Trump, it says it would be return to Trumps lawyer. What you read and what you think you read are totally different. 55555555555

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, janclaes47 said:

You Trump haters get really hilarious ............or should that be desperate?  55555555555555555555

??? as a trump lover, with blind faith in your masters purity of thought and deed, can we assume you would be all for full disclosure of the matter covered by the NDA, to underscore trumps whiteness

 

or do you believe that the truth should remain a dirty little secret?

 

Anyway.... , now that the cats (lol... right?) out of the bag, “we, the people” should be entitled to an explaination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mike324 said:

No, the article never said she will send the money back to Trump, it says it would be return to Trumps lawyer. What you read and what you think you read are totally different. 55555555555

 

This is what I read in the article, but maybe you have a different one then.

 

" Avenatti in a letter to Cohen, a copy of which was seen by Reuters, said the actress would wire the funds to an account of Trump's choosing by Friday. "

 

So why would Trump have to choose an account, if he didn't sent the money in the first place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Credo said:

This could be most interesting, since it is the President who has to sign it and has to agree to what account the money is sent to.   It will be a tacit confession to the whole sorted mess.   There will be no plausible deniability.

"the whole sorted mess." The whole sordid mess is far from being sorted!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares if Trump has had an affair with a pornstar , even while married ?
It's just another attack on him because he is president and some folks can't live with that.
 
You miss the point.
It's not the schtupping.
It's the coverup.

Sent from my [device_name] using http://Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, BuaBS said:

Who cares if Trump has had an affair with a pornstar , even while married ?

It's just another attack on him because he is president and some folks can't live with that.

 

I certainly don't care, but there again, I'm not American, However, I do expect politicians to have skeletons in their closets. After all, Clinton "did not have sex with that woman!" Did he?

Edited by sambum
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly don't care, but there again, I'm not American, However, I do expect politicians to have skeletons in their closets. After all, Clinton "did not have sex with that woman!" Did he?
Again you miss the point.
Not about the schtupping.
About the coverup.

Duh.

Sent from my [device_name] using http://Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Again you miss the point.
Not about the schtupping.
About the coverup.

Duh.

Sent from my [device_name] using http://Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Duh? Not missing the point at all - I don't suppose Clinton tried to cover up his "affair"either? Duh!

 

And "Who cares if Trump has had an affair with a pornstar , even while married ?"

I would imagine quite a few million God fearing Americans who take pride in their "family values" might be a trifle concerned that their President is/was "schtupping" (?) with a porn star  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duh? Not missing the point at all - I don't suppose Clinton tried to cover up his "affair"either? Duh!
 
And "Who cares if Trump has had an affair with a pornstar , even while married ?"
I would imagine quite a few million God fearing Americans who take pride in their "family values" might be a trifle concerned that their President is/was "schtupping" (?) with a porn star  
Clinton got in trouble for lying.
Not the affair.
In the Stormy incident its more like the payoff lawyer that is exposed. Fair chance he will be disbarred.
"trump" has more serious issues to worry about such as being charged with collusion with Russia, obstruction of Justice, and money laundering for Russian oligarchs.
This is embarrassing for "trump" but that could be trivial considering his epic shamelessness and ability to spin everything to the benefit of his ego.

Sent from my [device_name] using http://Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...