How come when I have 'relations' it cost me in meals , perfume , clothes and   paying the  actual up country" relations " in  farm  expenses and even hard cash .

When Don has relations it just costs him just  a small deposit which he may get to win back many times over ?

Am  I doing this right ?

 

8 hours ago, Briggsy said:

Trump is increasingly besieged. Hemmed in on all sides, on all sides, by opponents. Fewer and fewer are prepared to remain loyal except crooked lawyers. The opacity hiding his sordid life of lies, cons and bullying is being cleared and the truth revealed is ugly and unimpressive.

 

To try to hang on and keep his dirty secrets hidden, Trump relies on 3 standard tactics, lashing out, public insults, belittling and humiliation, legal, multi-million dollar law suits and endless filing of motions and going up the chain, pressuring or removing the judge/arbitrator/law enforcer/regulator/decision-maker/etc. He has always had success using these tactics.

 

Let us hope that on the larger stage, these tactics fail.

By my count that is 7?

 

I doubt he can be impeached for this affair.....but she could make millions and her lawyer to walk away......but then the book and film deal will make much more for them. As somebody said, "A standing president sueing a private citizen for 20,000,000 dollars is straight out of Alice in Wonderland." 

The question is, "How low can you go Stumpie?" or is there more to come.......he he he?

3 hours ago, marginline said:

Well, who would want to be truly unremarkable like you Mr Michael Avenatti? You two-bit ambulance chaser.

The law is the law. The 'lady' signed a "non-disclosure agreement". She got greedy. Reneged on said "non-disclosure agreement". This ain't rocket science! And so that's what really happened.

Simplisitic explanations are always the best when it comes to contract law. Except when they're not, which is virtually always.

And the lawyers get paid every time!

1 minute ago, ilostmypassword said:

Simplisitic explanations are always the best when it comes to contract law. Except when they're not, which is virtually always.

Agreed. Thank you for pointing that out ilostmypassword. FWIW I personally place a lot of faith in "simplistic explanations".  Occam's razor is one principle that comes to mind. I would still place my chips on President Trump's side of the table because I despise vermin that try to weasel out of their obligations. Again thank you though. 

3 minutes ago, marginline said:

Agreed. Thank you for pointing that out ilostmypassword. FWIW I personally place a lot of faith in "simplistic explanations".  Occam's razor is one principle that comes to mind. I would still place my chips on President Trump's side of the table because I despise vermin that try to weasel out of their obligations. Again thank you though. 

And you apparently don't despise vermin who blatantly lie. But the point you raised was a legal one and you could do worse (and probably will) than read the analysis I linked to.

10 hours ago, Langsuan Man said:

but..but..but how can you file a lawsuit for a breach of an  NDA that , according to Trump, does not exist 

Exactly my thought.

 

However I think this approach is just to scare others coming out of the woodwork.

 

Could do the opposite.

 

11 hours ago, Berkshire said:

   I hope Trump gets impeached and his wife bolts and fleeces his ass.  As the Thais say, "som num na."

1

Seriously? You go around hoping for things like this? Perhaps some anger-management counseling is in order.

1 hour ago, tropo said:

Seriously? You go around hoping for things like this? Perhaps some anger-management counseling is in order.

f so,  he should get in line behind Trump. Way behind Trump. 

15 hours ago, lovelomsak said:

It is like I said who cares. No arquement here I do not care who has sex with who. Or who goes to court over sex it is crap news tabloid at the best.

Everybody with decency should care.

Edited March 18, 20188 yr by yimlitnoy

2 hours ago, yimlitnoy said:

Everybody with decency should care.

...and man; would I love to shine the brightest of bright, bright flashlights into your closet yimlitnoy because; having read what you have just written, the fall from where you're at with that - is not nice.

Team Trump keeping this whole thing going will erode his image even in the base.  Red-faced parents will be asked "mommy, what's a pornstar?"  Day to day the subject will come up at work, the laughter will keep coming, and he's an even bigger buffoon than Clinton was with his pants around his ankles.  And that mention about taking away people's guns before due process, and whatever other shenanigans, will eventually wear away at all but the dumbest of DT's fan base.

 

 

17 hours ago, marginline said:

Well, who would want to be truly unremarkable like you Mr Michael Avenatti? You two-bit ambulance chaser.

The law is the law. The 'lady' signed a "non-disclosure agreement". She got greedy. Reneged on said "non-disclosure agreement". This ain't rocket science! And so that's what really happened.

Ah, let's see, she signs a contract, but the other party doesn't....then it's not a contract.   

On 3/18/2018 at 8:15 AM, lovelomsak said:

It is like I said who cares. No arquement here I do not care who has sex with who. Or who goes to court over sex it is crap news tabloid at the best.

Trump's entire existence is tabloid crap (at best) and it is of his own doing. The media is just reporting on this clown...doing their jobs. Like all news stories on TV and elsewhere...if one doesn't like the topic, one can move on to something more interesting. 

"The contract then goes on to offer a promise from Trump, who in the lawsuit is referred to by the pseudonym David Dennison, to release any of his potential claims against Clifford, who in the lawsuit is referred by the pseudonym Peggy Peterson."

 

it would seem Peggy got "pegged"

Stormy Daniels Has Raised $232,000 With Help From Jimmy Kimmel “I never thought giving money to a porn star would be considered an act of patriotism, but then again I never thought a guy who got into a Twitter war with Cher would become president,” Kimmel said during his show, ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’

 

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/03/18/stormy-daniels-has-raised-232000-with-help-from-jimmy-kimmel.html

 

Stormy Daniels is a feminist hero because when she succeeds, she will likely open the door for the list of women who have accused Trump of sexually harassing or assaulting them to step forward, too. Her justice will bring others justice. If American history has taught us one important lesson, it’s that sex scandals — in all their forms — can be more powerful than whispers of corruption when it comes to pushing a politician out of office"

https://www.salon.com/2018/03/18/stormy-daniels-is-a-feminist-hero/

23 hours ago, marginline said:

Well, who would want to be truly unremarkable like you Mr Michael Avenatti? You two-bit ambulance chaser.

The law is the law. The 'lady' signed a "non-disclosure agreement". She got greedy. Reneged on said "non-disclosure agreement". This ain't rocket science! And so that's what really happened.

I can’t for the life of me even figure this out. She says she wants to give the 130k back. What world is she living in, that’s not how it works. That’s something a 5 year old may be smart enough not to say. I don’t understand how she can even be taken seriously given the position she’s assumed for herself. She took the money, now she wants to give it back so she can talk to then get more money? I’m not a trump fan but I hope he gets millions from her, I really do. That would make my day as it would actually be justice in my opinion. 

18 hours ago, tropo said:

Seriously? You go around hoping for things like this?

You're darn straight.  Trump's Presidency has been a disgrace and he needs to be held to account for the damage he's doing to America.  Beyond impeachment, I also hope that the red-headed orangutan spends some lengthy time in prison...and worse.  Get it?     

On ‎3‎/‎18‎/‎2018 at 8:22 AM, Berkshire said:

Of course, no one will say that they "care" about this.  Trump deserves to get impeached for many other, more serious issues.  But if Trump gets impeached over this--like B. Clinton did--then the end justifies the means.  I hope Trump gets impeached and his wife bolts and fleeces his ass.  As the Thais say, "som num na."

Why should Trump get impeached?  Clinton wasn't impeached for allegedly having sex with someone!

11 minutes ago, Just Weird said:

Why should Trump get impeached?  Clinton wasn't impeached for allegedly having sex with someone!

Clinton was in fact impeached...by the House.  But it was subsequently overturned by the Senate.  Nevertheless, that's not the point.  Trump has much more baggage, including but not limited to, collusion, corruption, obstruction, etc., etc.

1 minute ago, Berkshire said:

Clinton was in fact impeached...by the House.  But it was subsequently overturned by the Senate.  Nevertheless, that's not the point.  

I know Clinton was impeached, I didn't say that he wasn't!  I did say that he wasn't impeached for having sex with someone as the poster I responded to seemed to be suggesting by comparing the Clinton incident and the alleged Trump incident.

9 minutes ago, Just Weird said:

I know Clinton was impeached, I didn't say that he wasn't!  I did say that he wasn't impeached for having sex with someone as the poster I responded to seemed to be suggesting by comparing the Clinton incident and the alleged Trump incident.

Geez man, everyone knows that.  Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex, but for lying about it and obstruction.  And what's Trump doing? 

45 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

You're darn straight.  Trump's Presidency has been a disgrace and he needs to be held to account for the damage he's doing to America.  Beyond impeachment, I also hope that the red-headed orangutan spends some lengthy time in prison...and worse.  Get it?     

Yes, I do get it. You have problems. As you're already very angry, rather than make you angrier I'll leave it at that.

Edited March 19, 20188 yr by tropo

28 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

Clinton was in fact impeached...by the House.  But it was subsequently overturned by the Senate.  Nevertheless, that's not the point.  Trump has much more baggage, including but not limited to, collusion, corruption, obstruction, etc., etc.

Yes, but I wouldn't phrase it that way. Clinton was impeached by the house and history will always show that he was impeached. Impeachment is very rare. What the senate failed to do was CONVICT him which would have removed him from office. But the impeachment stands. 

 

Compare to notorious Nixon. Nixon was on the road to being impeached AND convicted (removed) but he was persuaded to avoid that unpleasantness by RESIGNING. So ironically Nixon was NOT impeached. 

Edited March 19, 20188 yr by Jingthing

17 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

Geez man, everyone knows that.  Clinton wasn't impeached for having sex, but for lying about it and obstruction.  And what's Trump doing? 

Geez man, he's not doing anything like Clinton did, Trump has not been accused of perjury and obstruction by the House of representatives, has he?

Edited March 19, 20188 yr by Just Weird

Just now, Just Weird said:

Well he's not doing anything like Clinton did, Trump has not been accused of perjury and obstruction by the House of representatives, has he?

Not yet. Maybe not ever. The sex scandals are only a small part of "trump's" potential legal problems. 

1 hour ago, Just Weird said:

Geez man, he's not doing anything like Clinton did, Trump has not been accused of perjury and obstruction by the House of representatives, has he?

True, he is much worse.