Jump to content

Trump White House axes Nasa research into greenhouse gas cuts


webfact

Recommended Posts

Trump White House axes Nasa research into greenhouse gas cuts

 

President Donald Trump's administration has quietly axed US space agency Nasa's monitoring system into greenhouse gases, a US journal has revealed.

 

The Carbon Monitoring System (CMS), a $10m (£7m)-a-year project which remotely tracks the world's flow of carbon dioxide, is to lose funding.

 

Science magazine reports that its loss jeopardises the ability to measure national emission cuts - as agreed to by nations in the Paris climate deal.

 

Full story: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44067797

 
bbc_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright BBC 2018-05-11
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sayin' every climate change denier is a kiddie fiddler but, if the vestment fits, you must convict.

 

When in Rome...

 

Scott Pruitt Broke Bread With a Climate-Skeptic Cardinal Accused of Sexual Abuse

 

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt dined at a five-star restaurant with Cardinal George Pell, a climate-change skeptic who faces child sexual abuse charges, during a visit to Rome in June 2017, documents obtained by the New York Times show.

 

According to the Times, EPA staff knew the Cardinal was under investigation at the time, and multiple EPA schedules from that day do not include the meeting with Pell. Pruitt’s chief of staff and Leonard Leo, executive vice president of the Federalist Society, were also at the dinner.

 

Cardinal Pell will soon stand trial for multiple counts of child sexual abuse. 

 

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/05/scott-pruitt-broke-bread-with-a-climate-skeptic-cardinal-accused-of-sexual-abuse/

 

 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Expatthailover said:

Shouldn't surprise anyone that dopey don is a climate change denier.

 

While he may be a global warming denier, it is expected. He is, after all, a chief executive of the Trump corporation. He is looking after all those industries that might suffer if industry CO2 levels were capped.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good move by President Trump. Save money to monitor something that isn't a problem. Do your research, with an open mind! The volcano in Hawaii is releasing more than 10 tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every day. It's foolish to think human endeavour can have any effect on CO2 emissions. Besides, CO2 is NOT a greenhouse gas. Again, do the research.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AsiaHand said:

Good Idea, This is not NASA's job.Their job is the exploration of space.

https://www.nasa.gov/

 

not according to NASA.

 

meanwhile... no study, no fake news ( per Vauses hilarious comment yesterday... fake news really means “bad news for me”[don chump])... therefore no measurable and verifiable climate change.... no action required to protect the climate from donors wishing to further destroy the climate

 

CE323D97-9919-4778-9777-FF131889CFF1.png

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rockhopper said:

Good move by President Trump. Save money to monitor something that isn't a problem. Do your research, with an open mind! The volcano in Hawaii is releasing more than 10 tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every day. It's foolish to think human endeavour can have any effect on CO2 emissions. Besides, CO2 is NOT a greenhouse gas. Again, do the research.

Duh... uranium is radioactive and is a naturally occurring substance.... by your logic, there should be no need to give a damn about nuclear weoponry 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

The fact that the USA actually elected a climate denying demagogue makes the USA look bad. Don't need to invent anything for that. 

Perhaps the USA would look better if Hillary Clinton hadn't ushered President Trump towards the White House by declaring: "We're going to put a lot of coal miners, and coal companies, out of business." Against some very stiff competition, that might have been her stupidest remark of the campaign.

 

Besides, nobody really cares about this stuff any more; the virtue signallers can point to the 2015 Paris agreement as "solving the climate crisis", while countries like China and India have been given a free hand to pump out as much greenhouse gas as they want.

 

The Paris agreement was a win-win situation; only the true zealots still claim this makes the US "look bad."

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rgraham said:

Wasted money anyway.

Indeed... 100% correct... you and I will be long dead before it effects our grandchildren, or great grandchildren.... bugger them and their offspring and the planet in general, because I just watched a rerun of Star Wars, and apparently we will all be living in another solar system by the time earths atmospheres is to rooted for human habitation.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, farcanell said:

Indeed... 100% correct... you and I will be long dead before it effects our grandchildren, or great grandchildren.... bugger them and their offspring and the planet in general, because I just watched a rerun of Star Wars, and apparently we will all be living in another solar system by the time earths atmospheres is to rooted for human habitation.

Co2 is good for plants. They thrive on it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jingthing said:

The fact that the USA actually elected a climate denying demagogue makes the USA look bad. Don't need to invent anything for that. 

Temperatures were a lot warmer 10,000  years ago.

 

The fact so many have done zero research and just believe lefties in the media is sad.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, farcanell said:

Duh... uranium is radioactive and is a naturally occurring substance.... by your logic, there should be no need to give a damn about nuclear weoponry 

So are bananas.  Uranium is weakly radioactive, I think the particles are dangerous if ingested/inhaled. 

 

Jumping from that all the way to nuclear weapons.....

image.png.98806a52d36e3003df1729858d0eaa70.png

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, 55Jay said:

So are bananas.  Uranium is weakly radioactive, I think the particles are dangerous if ingested/inhaled. 

 

Jumping from that all the way to nuclear weapons.....

image.png.98806a52d36e3003df1729858d0eaa70.png

 

 

Exactly.... thanks for your support.... you see the stupidity of the anti blah blah bs

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...