Unethical of PM to appoint sedition defendant to junta PR role, say critics

By The Nation

 

 

The recent appointment of a former protest leader, who is facing a sedition charge, as the prime minister’s deputy secretary-general has sparked criticism as people question whether it is appropriate and meets an ethical standard.

 

The Cabinet on Tuesday appointed former Democrat Party MP Buddhipong Punnakanta to the post with immediate effect. 

 

Buddhipong was a key figure in the now-defunct People’s Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC), which led a street rally against the previous government of Yingluck Shinawatra in 2013. 

 

A statement issued by Srisuwan Junya, secretary-general of the Thai Constitution Protection Organisation Association on Wednesday, deemed that the Cabinet’s appointment severely violated the ethical code in Article 219 of the current constitution.

 

He said the appointee is being accused of sedition charges along with other PDRC members. The offence carries a severe penalty and was the cause of the military coup, he said.

 

“The appointment reminds society to look back to the root cause of the coup [and wonder] whether PDRC and coup makers had a close relationship before [the coup],” he said.

 

Pheu Thai Party deputy spokesperson Anusorn Iamsa-ard questioned how the appointment of a person who is facing severe criminal charges would enhance reconciliation.

 

Society cannot imagine how an appointment of a person who caused a riot, protested against and obstructed an election [in 2014], would be a support for the country [in the lead up]to an election, said Anusorn. 

 

Meanwhile, Buddhipong on Wednesday reported to Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha and said he would report directly to the premier going forward but not work as his personal spokesperson. 

 

The newly appointed deputy PM’s secretary-general said he was assigned to help with public-relations communications about the government’s performance and to be a go-between in handling public complaints about the government.

 

This was the second time he had been invited by government figures to join the government and he said it would not have been appropriate to refuse twice.

 

“When I received one more opportunity from PM Prayut, I do not have the right to reject [the invitation] from “phu yai’ [senior citizen],” he said.

 

His first invitation was to chair the board of Tourism Authority of Thailand, but it was not convenient for him to take the post at that time.

 

The former Democrat party MP said he won’t return to his former party to run for election, but declined to say whether or not he would join a party that backed General Prayut as the next prime minister. 

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/breakingnews/30354315

 

 

-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-09-12

Ethical standards ? That's a new one for the Junta. Section 44 discounts ethical standards as not necessary and a potential hindrance to rule by armed force surely ?

At least now we know how he is gathering support and spies ,

 

He gives them lucrative positions 

21 minutes ago, Jonathan Fairfield said:

".......people question whether it is appropriate and meets an ethical standard".

Why single this out as an example? Just about everything he does is unethical, in one form or another.

He dishonours himself and his country.

Ethical or unethical he is no matter for them. Do as I say, not as I do.. But after they force the win in the election, it will be all like a movie line from the Italian guy in Gumball Rally. what-sa behind me is not important. 

1 hour ago, Esso49 said:

Ethical standards ? That's a new one for the Junta. Section 44 discounts ethical standards as not necessary and a potential hindrance to rule by armed force surely ?

...as one cannot legislate what passes for social mores. 

 

Shirley, their attempts are paged deep in cultural rhetoric. 

It is what it is.

What more can we expect from this man (?) who simply cannot tell right from wrong, fair from unfair and who clearly doesn't realise that 'his' people have principles . . . principles, ethics and standards that might - just might - be gearing up to slap him on the ass, at a time and date of his own devious choosing?

Just about everything living and breathing breaks the ethical code here and even a few dead friends? 

12 hours ago, Jonathan Fairfield said:

the Cabinet’s appointment severely violated the ethical code in Article 219 of the current constitution

Oh oh, time to quickly write an addition to that constitution saying it is not allowed unless it is done by the current government. Just as they have included so many exceptions already for a period of 5 years.

History shows us, those who are branded 'criminals' and those who are not branded 'criminals' is directly related to whether a coup is successful or unsuccessful. 

"To the victor goes the spoils."
"History is written by the victors."