Jump to content

Trump says transgender policy seeks to 'protect the country'


webfact

Recommended Posts

Trump says transgender policy seeks to 'protect the country'

By Gabriella Borter and Barbara Goldberg

 

2018-10-22T235138Z_1_LYNXNPEE9L1XK_RTROPTP_4_USA-LGBT-TRUMP.JPG

Transgender rights activists protest the government's alleged attempt to strip transgender people of official recognition at the White House in Washington, U.S., October 22, 2018. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

 

(Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday that transgender issues were in flux and he aims to protect the country after a report that his administration was considering defining gender as male or female based on genitalia at birth drew widespread condemnation.

 

"We have a lot of different concepts right now. They have a lot of different things happening with respect to transgender right now," Trump said amid a protest outside the White House and outpouring of criticism on social media about the proposal.

 

Asked about a campaign promise to protect the LGBT community, Trump said: "I'm protecting everybody. I want to protect our country."

 

Under a proposal first reported by the New York Times on Sunday, the Trump administration would narrow the definition of gender to male or female at birth and it would be unchangeable later in life. 

 

The move would remove recognition of and protections for transgender people under U.S. civil rights laws promoted by the prior administration of President Barack Obama in health care, schools and the military.

 

About 1.4 million U.S. adults identify as transgender, according to a 2016 estimate by the Williams Institute, a research centre at UCLA Law School focused on sexual orientation and gender identity law and public policy.

 

The reported proposal comes little more than a week after New York City created a gender-neutral "X" option for birth certificates, joining California, Oregon, Washington state and New Jersey in offering a third gender category on the government-issued identity documents. 

 

Medical experts said on Monday that defining gender based on genitalia at birth is scientifically inaccurate and may harm patients' health.

 

Dr. Joshua Safer, executive director of Mount Sinai Hospital's Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, said the Trump administration's definition is "not consistent with current western medicine or science in terms of how we actually operate or define sex of individuals."

 

"Sex of individuals is not correlated always with their genitals at birth, or with their chromosomes," said Safer, who also serves as president of the United States Professional Association for Transgender Health.

 

Most transgender people live with a profound sense that the gender assigned to them at birth was wrong and transition to the opposite sex, while others live a non-binary or gender-fluid life.

 

"We urge the administration to ensure all public health policy is firmly rooted in science, and to keep discrimination and political interference out of our nation’s health,” said Dr. Lisa Hollier, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

 

Beyond the broader issues raised by the administration memo, doctors said the new policy would be impossible to apply to "intersex" babies who are born with ambiguous genitalia or reproductive organs.

 

"Trump's definition does not even take this entire group of patients into consideration," said Dr. Natasha Bhuyan, a family medicine and LGBT care specialist in Phoenix.

 

If the administration's recommended definition is adopted, these patients will likely be assigned a male or female sex at birth, which can have devastating long-term psychological and health consequences, she said.

 

(Reporting by Barbara Goldberg and Gabriella Borter; additional reporting by Daniel Trotta in New York and Jeff Mason in Washington; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-10-23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, webfact said:

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday that transgender issues were in flux and he aims to protect the country

Against what? ????

 

But then again, understandable when relating to his policies on immigration when his forefathers were likely immigrants themselves! :coffee1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laverne Cox Responds To Possible Trump Anti-Transgender Move: 'I Choose Love Not Fear'

Actress Laverne Cox condemned a proposal reportedly under consideration by President Donald Trump’s administration to dramatically limit transgender rights, responding with a message that included a call to action.

The New York Times reported on Sunday that the administration is reviewing a policy that would narrowly define gender as either male or female ― a matter that, according to the proposal, is determined by genitalia at birth. Such a limited definition would have deeply negative impacts on the transgender community, potentially affecting their health.

 

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/laverne-cox-responds-possible-trump-204823385.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Peasandmash said:

Unbelievable to think laws are needed to clarify that if you have a penis you're a man. Mankind has started moving in the wrong direction..

 

btw... Thanks for the tranny statistics.  I wonder what the Sukhumviet Thai ladyboy statistics look like? 

Sadly your opinion has been formed by your time spent in the sex trade areas...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny they quote Dr. Shafer  on this subject this doctor is in the tranny business. The doctor states that gender designation based on genitals and chromosomes is 'unscientific",  is it then more. scientific to base it on "feelings" ?  There are a very few intersex individuals hermaphrdites ...  freaks of nature.   This really doesn't affect most folks the exception being in sports where you see dudes competing as girls and winning constantly, unfair advantage.  There are only 2 genders and an occasional mutation, mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jingthing said:

First they came for the transgender people. Denied they even exist. We said nothing because we're not transgender people.

Dot

Dot

Dot

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

 

I think they've come for the transgender people last, not first. Because they've aready come for most everyone else already, and because they're a microscopic percentage of the population besides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DoctorG said:

There are only 2 genders but there is an infinite number of gender roles. I do not care what/who you identify or sleep with but do not try to manipulate biology.

correct . cutting your dick off dosnt make you into a woman , your still just a dude who cut his dick off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Peasandmash said:

...First they came for the transgender people...

 

They weren't coming for them, they were going to a Ladyboy bar. I saw them, they don't look threatening.

 

Why do they call these people Gay? They should be called sad, shameless and hateful.  

They don't. Maybe you do. Gender identity is not the same thing as sexual orientation. DUH. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that transgender combat troops are a good idea.  Then when pinned down in a fox-hole, you know that your trans platoon-mates Julie, Kimberly, and Shantrell have the physical strength and stamina to pull your bacon out of the fire when push comes to shove. 

Don't get me wrong.  I still have the hots for combat-ready women in uniform. 
Man - cool as a cucumber.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if the transgendered, gay, lmnop community? we're doing something like not using petroleum products to protest the way Islamic oil producing counties treat their tans/gay/whatever brothers and sisters they would have some credibility. When it's the spoiled American man in a dress asking for public tax dollars to build separate bathrooms it's clear the "community" is delusional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, sfokevin said:

Protect us!!!... Statistically you are more like to be assaulted by a republican congressman in the bathroom than a transgendered individual... :coffee1:

I didn't know that Cory Booker was a Republican?  :whistling:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Credo said:

I wonder if Caitlyn Jenner is still supporting him?

 

He's probably been listening to Mike Pence.

 

Quote

The Southern Poverty Law Center has labeled the Family Research Council a hate group, giving Pence another first for this administration: He’s the first sitting vice president to speak at the anti-LGBT group’s summit.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/mike-pence-anti-lgbt-729740/
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...