.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 1 member
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
20
The Looming Economic Storm in Europe
One only has to look at the state of Germany nowadays. Another once powerful industrial country on a steep decline. Madame Merkel has a lot to answer for. -
55
Spanish student dies after being attacked by elephant in Thailand
To be honest considering the amount of tattoos that they have I can barely see the bikini -
86
SO who of you guys live in Thailand?
Speak for yourself. Say it like this. "I'm not sure about others, but I myself hate Americans because I don't know much about them besides what I see others say on forums and in videos" When you visited Vietnam, how many locals did you actually ask if they hated Americans? From what I see, how many Vietnamese live in the US and how friends were treated visiting Vietnam, they have no problem with us. Our president didn't give money away to bomb children. The military has bombs mainly to drop on terrorists and others who are trying to hurt either us or others, or both. And saying you're trying to "get" through as many Thai women as possible, is a pretty misogynistic attitude which shows you're feelings on what women are here for. -
86
-
9
Car Bursts into Flames After Fuel System Change
Is this oversight commonly available in Thailand? -
22
Koh Phangan Boat Operators Demand Mid-Journey Payments From Tourists
Yes, I mean all transport options. And there's many other 'situations' which have serious monitoring in many other countries which are lax or non-existent in the LOS. One example is the construction industry; there's continuous incidents which result in large sections of building under construction falling down and there's regular deaths. There's also the regular deaths at zebra crossings, and you regularly see cars, m/cycles, trucks, buses etc., making no attempt to stop for pedestrians. This situations has multiple faults, and proper monitoring to collect valuable data to help construct better laws and better equipment is just one missing item.- 1
-
-
320
Yes, Virginia, Donald J. Trump WILL be the first convicted felon to become U.S. president
WILL CONGRESS SUPPLY THE CONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRED REMEDYhttps://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t4c/1/16/2753.png January 6th Election Certification might academically agree that the election was won by DJ Trump, BUT he can not legally be sworn into office UNLESS AND UNTIL both the House and the Senate by a 2/3rds majority vote to remove this disability. (I suspect that Congress will duck their mandated role, just as SCOTUS ducked its role last year.) Consider Trump's own recent acknowledgement of constitutional requirements: "Musk can't be president because he wasn't born in the USA" By the words of the 14th Amendment, how can someone who supported an insurrection be sworn into office? Even if the election is certified? Note the adjudication so far: https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t2d/1/16/2666.png The House voted the 2nd impeachment (bipartisan) https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t2d/1/16/2666.png The Senate voted 57-43 for conviction (bipartisan) https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t2d/1/16/2666.png The House Select Committee voted unanimously to indict (refer Trump for potential criminal prosecution) DJ Trump for 4 charges: Obstruction of an Official Proceeding; Conspiracy to Defraud the United States; Conspiracy to Make a False Statement and "Incite," "Assist" or "Aid and Comfort" an Insurrection. (bipartisan) https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t2d/1/16/2666.png Section 3 of the 14th Amendment says candidates are disallowed if they've "engaged in insurrection." Both the Colorado justices and Maine Secretary Bellows said Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election, which ended with an attack on the U.S. Capitol, fit that description. Significantly. the Colorado Supreme Court heard an appeal, but upheld that decision. Then the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously that individual states cannot remove former President Donald Trump from their ballots based on the 14th Amendment. BUT https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/images/emoji.php/v9/t2d/1/16/2666.png SCOTUS DID NOT RULE ON TRUMP'S ELIGIBILITY TO AGAIN HOLD OFFICE. Of note by former Federal Prosecutor Glenn Kirschner: https://youtu.be/5OCN-OvYsW0- 1
-
-
86
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now