Jump to content

Brexit bribe? UK PM May unveils $2.1 billion fund for Brexit-backing towns


webfact

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, 7by7 said:

 

Ah, the usual pathetic excuse.

 

May was not very popular as Home Secretary, there is a good chance that had a more popular challenger, such as Johnson, stood against her that they would have won; regardless of their stance on Brexit.

 

But he, and Gove, knew that delivering a Brexit which pleased everyone, even every Brexiteer, was going to be nigh on impossible; so they both bottled it and left the task to May. 

 

That way May gets the blame, and they can stand back with a metaphorical smirk on their faces saying "Told you so." 

 

 

 

Why not just look at the facts. Gove was on the Leave campaign as was Boris. The vast majority of Tory MPs want to remain. They were never going to allow a Leaver to lead the party! 

Instead they squeezed all the Leave contenders out and put their 'soft' remainer into no.10. 

You can almost sense what was going on from fierce remainer Ken Clarke's comments here, as he 'encouraged' Michael Gove to drop out of the contest: 

 

“In the national interest we’ve got to select a Prime Minister as quickly and sensibly as we possibly can,” Mr Clarke told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “There is a real threat to our economy until we make some progress. We need somebody in office who can carry the confidence of all his or her colleagues"

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


4 hours ago, Loiner said:


Leadsom was there to the end finally withdrew.
Gove was eliminated after two rounds.
Fox was eliminated after one round.
Boris was stabbed in the back early by Gove.
What would you expect when the party is Remain?


Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

 OK, Fox and Grove were eliminated; the rest withdrew. Including prominant leave campaigner Leadsom who, along with May, was one of the two candadates with sufficient votes to go forward in to the final round. But she withdrew rather than face the possibility of defeat.

 

The biggest surprise being the withdrawal of the analysts, pundits and even the bookies favourite to win the whole thing; Boris Johnson.

 

You may offer the feeble excuse that he withdrew after being 'stabbed in the back' by Gove; most of us know it was political cowardice. He'd been instumental in convincing 52% of those who voted to vote leave, but now hadn't a clue about how to carry that out. None of the Vote.Leave mob did. Their campaign was strong on how nasty the EU was, but compleltly lacking in what they would do if they won. So the front runner withdrew before voting even started so that someone else would carry the can when the whole thing inevitably went pear shaped.

 

It is obvious to all, or rather all who are paying attention, that Boris' statergy all along has been to avoid having any part in the actualities of Brexit and hang around on the fringes hoping the party will turn to him when may resigns.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CG1 Blue said:

 

Why not just look at the facts. Gove was on the Leave campaign as was Boris. The vast majority of Tory MPs want to remain. They were never going to allow a Leaver to lead the party! 

Instead they squeezed all the Leave contenders out and put their 'soft' remainer into no.10. 

You can almost sense what was going on from fierce remainer Ken Clarke's comments here, as he 'encouraged' Michael Gove to drop out of the contest: 

 

“In the national interest we’ve got to select a Prime Minister as quickly and sensibly as we possibly can,” Mr Clarke told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “There is a real threat to our economy until we make some progress. We need somebody in office who can carry the confidence of all his or her colleagues"

Clarke was, of course, right. We needed a strong PM with the full support of their party. Although Clarke didn't agree, at the beginning of the campaign that person was the front runner; Boris. But he withdrew for the reasons I've already explained.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

Clarke was, of course, right. We needed a strong PM with the full support of their party. Although Clarke didn't agree, at the beginning of the campaign that person was the front runner; Boris. But he withdrew for the reasons I've already explained.

 

I'm no Boris fan anyway, but whatever you say about the people involved, the fact is a Leave candidate was never going to get the PM job because the vast majority of their MPs wanted to remain. That's obvious surely! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

I'm no Boris fan anyway, but whatever you say about the people involved, the fact is a Leave candidate was never going to get the PM job because the vast majority of their MPs wanted to remain. That's obvious surely! 

Is it?

 

Then why was Boris the favourite to suceed Cameron until he withdrew?

 

Boris Johnson favourite to replace David Cameron as PM after Brexit

 

Boris Johnson is bookmaker's favourite to succeed Cameron

 

Boris Johnson favourite amongst Tories to succeed Cameron

 

BORIS JOHNSON THE EARLY FAVOURITE TO SUCCEED DAVID CAMERON

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 He'd been instumental in convincing 52% of those who voted to vote leave,

Well you’ve certainly got a hard on for Boris. Instrumental in convincing 52%? I don’t think so.
Don’t Remainers think it was all a one man show by Nigel Farage? You forget that it’s actually the EU and all it stands for, that resulted in the Leave vote. Not a politician. Not a campaign. Not a big red bus.


Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Loiner said:


Well you’ve certainly got a hard on for Boris. Instrumental in convincing 52%? I don’t think so.
Don’t Remainers think it was all a one man show by Nigel Farage? You forget that it’s actually the EU and all it stands for, that resulted in the Leave vote. Not a politician. Not a campaign. Not a big red bus.


Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

Boris was one of the, if not the, major public faces of the leave campaign. To say that he was not instrumental in leave's narrow victory shows one of three things:

  1. you don't know what 'instrumental' in this context means, or
  2. your total ignorance of the campaign itself, or
  3. both.

The more you post, the more obvious it becomes that you were not in the UK at the time; if indeed you ever have been.

Edited by 7by7
Addendum
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Loiner said:


Yes, the Remainers fault.
Remainers control the CON party, so even after trying a Leaver could not become PM, and we ended up with Theresa the appeaser. She forced out Davis and Raab to get her deal with Merkel into position. The combined CON and LAB Remainer forces in parliament have steered the country towards BRINO. Hence our current shambles.
Yes, it’s all Remainers fault.


Sent from my iPhone using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

are you still dream of brexit,it wont happen but dont worry spoonies will still be there and your pension will still be the same,your local hospital wont close and you can vote for tommy at the next GE,happy days

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 7by7 said:

These headlines were made before people outside of Parliament knew the inner workings of the Tory party and the Leave/Remain arithmetic within. 

The Ladbrokes article even describes May as a Leave campaigner. Shows how little they knew at that point in time! 

 

What the bookies said is irrelevant. Just look at the basic facts. Do you think all those remainer tories (~75% of the members) would have voted in a leaver as PM? 

 

Anyway, let's agree to disagree. This is all history now. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bomber said:

are you still dream of brexit,it wont happen but dont worry spoonies will still be there and your pension will still be the same,your local hospital wont close and you can vote for tommy at the next GE,happy days

You have an unhealthy obsession with Wetherspoons. Were you barred from their pubs or something? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

These headlines were made before people outside of Parliament knew the inner workings of the Tory party and the Leave/Remain arithmetic within. 

 

Really? Despite the Leave or Remain loyalties of every MP, of whatever party, being well publicised in the media during the campaign?

 

Well publicised here in the UK, at least; maybe not so in Thailand.

 

6 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

The Ladbrokes article even describes May as a Leave campaigner. Shows how little they knew at that point in time! 

Having worked for Ladbrokes for a short period; I'm not surprised. But the odds were based on more than that mistake. Bookies set their odds so that they don't lose money; you do know what an odds on favourite is, do you?

 

8 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

What the bookies said is irrelevant. Just look at the basic facts. Do you think all those remainer tories (~75% of the members) would have voted in a leaver as PM?

Yes, because he was the most popular candidate.

 

10 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

Anyway, let's agree to disagree. This is all history now.

If only it were. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, 7by7 said:

It is obvious to all, or rather all who are paying attention, that Boris' statergy all along has been to avoid having any part in the actualities of Brexit and hang around on the fringes hoping the party will turn to him when may resigns.

in my opinion he's a wuss and a wimp....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Nigel Garvie said:

Boris only made up his mind to be a Leaver at the last moment, when he calculated that it would be in his best personal interests. The following comments apply equally whether you are a leaver or remainer. Although he is popular among the rabid party members in the Shires, he is despised quite widely among Tory Party MPs, not (IMHO) because he pretends to be a leaver, but because they see enough of him to know, that he is a man utterly without principles of any sort. In the dog eats dog world of Tory politics there are levels that even vermin are not expected to sink to. For the general public who actually follow international news, the cringe making embarrassment of witnessing his general buffoonery, and gaff ridden journeys abroad, and watching him - as foreign secretary - make the UK an international laughing stock, was hard to bear. A wuss and a wimp certainly, but so much worse than that.

i watched that TV show when he was travelling around and you are correct he was embarrassing and a total tool,May aint perfect bu she would make mincemeat of him so god help him if he ever went face to face around a table with Tusk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2019 at 2:14 PM, CG1 Blue said:

I'm no Boris fan anyway, but whatever you say about the people involved, the fact is a Leave candidate was never going to get the PM job because the vast majority of their MPs wanted to remain. That's obvious surely! 

so its obvious your dream is over,what's next to dream about for your last few years on planet earth,keep putting the lottery on ????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bomber said:

so its obvious your dream is over,what's next to dream about for your last few years on planet earth,keep putting the lottery on ????????

I sometimes wonder if you live on planet Earth

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...