Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Answers demanded on Mekong rapids

By The Nation Weekend

 

55093fe5e9eb7748a70e984c2bde0e6d-sld.jpeg

// Nation Photo

 

An activist who has been fighting for years against the planned dredging of sections of the Mekong River for greater shipping access has called on the authorities to clarify the status of the project, which was supposed to have been cancelled following a meeting between Thai and Chinese officials last month.

 

Foreign Minister Don Pramudwinai said two weeks ago that China had agreed to bring the project to a halt after it had learned about environmental concerns. 

 

Activists, including Pianporn Deetes, campaign director for Thailand and Myanmar for International Rivers, and residents had raised concerns over the impact on ecosystems along stretches of the Mekong River arising from the proposed removal of rapids under the dredging works.

 

Don said China had promised to stop the project in a meeting he had with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Chiang Mai in mid-February.

lg.php?bannerid=0&campaignid=0&zoneid=14

 

However, it was the second time that Don had claimed a meeting with Wang had led to the project being suspended. 

 

Don had made a similar claim in December 2017 in Dali, southern China, on the sidelines of the Lancang Mekong Coopertion ministerial meeting.

 

Then came the 17th meeting of the Joint Committee on Coordination of Commercial Navigation on the Lancang-Mekong River (JCCCN) – with officials from China, Laos and Thailand – on March 26-28. A “summary of record” was produced with the third joint inspection on navigation procedures being set down for October. 

 

The second mission was carried out last October on a stretch of the river from Jinghong in China to Luang Prabang in Laos. This was recorded in the meeting.

 

Other work, including China’s final technical and strategic assessment reports – counted as preliminary work – was reported to the meeting as being completed and subject to decisions by individual countries to “proceed” further.

 

Other logistics work, including for navigation safety as well as the setting up of a navigation management unit, were also reported. This level of reporting has raised questions about the actual status of the project.

 

Pianporn said the agreements from the meeting showed the project had not been shelved, as declared by the minister.

 

Pianporn and others want clarity on the project, which started in the early 2000s. It is clear that the project has already proceeded on sections of the river in China, with damage to the environment reported.

 

The rapids on Mekong River are regarded as essential to the health of the waterway’s ecosystems as well as the livelihoods of people living along it. The river provides habitats and feeding grounds for fish, which allow the local fishermen to earn a reliable income and guarantee food security for communities, according to Pianporn.

 

As the work beyond Luang Prabang have not yet started, downstream areas should be protected, the activists say.

 

International Rivers has written to the department seeking clarification on the minister’s comments, but has not received a response, Pianporn said.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30366806

 

thenation_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation 2019-03-30

Posted
5 minutes ago, rooster59 said:

seeking clarification on the minister’s comments, but has not received a response,

that is your response or would another air-filled promise from that minister feel better ?

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...