Our growing data dependence brings risks

[rooster59]

Our growing data dependence brings risks

By Thawipong Anotaisinthawee 
SPECIAL TO THE NATION WEEKEND

 

 

DATA has been a hot topic of conversation for years  as vendors, consultancies, partners and customers have dissected every aspect of the subject from size, source, and location to identification, mining, analytics and value. Or so we thought.

 

While these discussions have proved insightful and, in many cases, improved business knowledge and value – they have overlooked one critical aspect. Our growing dependence on the data around us.

 

Many of the other aspects of data have been viewed as a choice. A sort of ‘take it or leave it”. That is not the case with dependency. We are all increasingly dependent on data. And as more and more devices become connected to the internet that dependency, and the implications for all of us, will also increase.

 

First, let’s clarify dependency: Individuals, businesses and governments now rely on storing and accessing data – almost minute by minute, if not more. For the individual, it may be simply email or iCloud photos; for businesses, it’s critical information on public, private and hybrid clouds; and for governments its citizenship and resource data required to ensure smooth, safe running of the country. 

 

The loss of an iCloud account and the associated data could obliterate a lifetime of memories; the inability to retrieve customer information or data on request, could fatally wound any enterprise large or small, and the loss of government data could cause economic turmoil, bringing the country to its knees - with ripples for the global economy.  None of these are insignificant – at any level. 

 

At issue is, as demand and dependency increase, dependency begins to look increasingly unsustainable. Currently only 5 per cent of worldwide data centres have been modernised, meaning 20-year-old legacy architecture is being charged with ensuring our transition into a data dependent world. 

 

Unless we rapidly adopt new technologies designed to reduce the gap between the infrastructure hardware layer and the application software layer, there will be a great number of risks. 

 

Regarding storage, the vast quantity of data available is not a new phenomenon, but quantity has physical limits. We often talk of the cloud as a nebulous, limitless space and have become so used to just “topping up” our storage capacity at will. But limitless it is not. iData is rapidly becoming similar to landfill sites. We add more and more, hour after hour, and we keep everything. Because there is no need to dispose of anything.

 

 As a result, our data centres become even bigger. The world’s largest data centre is The Citadel in Nevada, in the US. It covers a staggering 1.62 square kilometres  – that’s about 250 times the size of the presidential White House.

 

If the volume of data created continues its current trajectory (quadrupling in size every five  years), how will we manage it?

 

 Then there is access. How and when do we access our data and how quickly do we need it? That varies on the type, location and requirement of the data. As we move to autonomous vehicles, artificial intelligence (AI)  and machine learning,  the demands on data will increase as will the requirement to ensure critical applications receive priority. Which brings us to fragmentation.

 

As more and more devices centralise and decentralise data consumption, and we separate data across multiple locations for efficiency and cost effectiveness,  how will we ensure all our data is safe, secure, available and accessible when and where we need it?

 

In terms of environmental impact,  I mentioned the Citadel. While it is the greenest data centre in the world, it still comes with an environmental impact. As do the others.  And let’s not forget cost. We have mentioned the environmental impact from our dependency on data. There is also the physical cost. 

 

 I began this discussion highlighting the value of data to the individual, businesses or government. But in a world that quadruples the data created every five years,  how do we ensure the value increases. 

 

 And finally there is security. More and more data, from more and more devices, stored in more and more locations increase physical and digital risks to the integrity of the data and the entire connected system. 

 

While this may sound overwhelming, it should not be disheartening. New technologies are narrowing the gap between the physical and virtual world. As that gap shrinks even further, our ability to access, manage and benefit also increases.

 

Operating systems that simplify the operating environments for the enterprises entrusted with storing and maintaining our data are emerging. This of course does nothing to reduce our growing dependency, but it does help mitigate the risks and challenges associated with the deluge of data and our dependency on it.

 

Thawipong Anotaisinthawee is the country manager for Nutanix (Thailand).

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/Startup_and_IT/30370376

 

-- © Copyright The Nation 2019-06-02

Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info

[Dumbastheycome]

This article  is well worded  in it's pacifying justification of what it is selling.

The  fact is that  the "value" to individuals is of no consequence by comparison to the  value to  commercial or authoritarian concern. That even this  my input via electronic media will become a minute piece of  data of no particular consequence will be added of the dross of data storage. The only value of the content will not be in the expression of opinion but only in  the component  of  commercial systems of that storage with maybe a little  bonus in that the  very fact it has been  stored  can additionally be used  for  some vague statistical analysis.

For  commercial enterprise and Governmental  reference data etc  then there is of course practical purpose. But even that cannot be separated from the new age throw away commentary that is  social media which vastly pumps up the volume of data traffic. is that amount of electronic fingerprints actually of practical need of  storage when in  passage it has  already been electronically submitted to server filters etc for any extractable value in terms of the criteria of those filters?

There is  no question that the utilization of electronic systems  and  data has been a boon to  the world in terms of speed and efficiency in innumerable ways.

But assurances about security  pass over the vulnerability of the system/s to  factors including EMP's and  sun flares. Our dependency way also be our demise.

 

 

 

[RocketDog]

All our data is much more useful to others than it is to us as individuals.

It's an ever larger lever used to pry ever larger amounts of data from us. It is used ever more each day to mermerise, capture, constrain, delude, identify, classify, track, surveil, control, manipulate, deceive, monetize, and blind us in ever widening elements of our lives.

 

Be careful of what you give away so lavishly and thoughtlessly. It will always come back to you.

 

Yes, I'm very cynical about this 'Information Age'. Alexa, Cortana, and Siri indeed!

Count me out.

But, as always: Up to you.