U.S. Senate leader says he hopes Trump intelligence nominee will get bipartisan vote

By Patricia Zengerle

 

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks to reporters after the Senate voted to acquit U.S. President Donald Trump of both charges in his Senate impeachment trial in Washington, U.S., February 5, 2020. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on Monday he was pleased President Donald Trump had announced a nominee for director of national intelligence, without expressing an opinion about Representative John Ratcliffe's fitness for the job.

 

Trump announced on Friday he would for a second time nominate Ratcliffe, a Republican member of the House of Representatives, to be the nation's top spy. Trump had nominated him last summer, but it was dropped amid questions about a lack of experience and possible resume embellishment.

 

In remarks as the Senate opened on Monday, McConnell said his fellow Republican Trump had record of sending the Senate "impressive" nominees for national security positions.

 

"I hope Congressman Ratcliffe will impress Senators, just as did the other members of the President's team, and earn a bipartisan confirmation vote," McConnell said.

 

The Senate's Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer, said Ratcliffe was a "rank partisan" and poor choice for a position typically held by individuals with decades of intelligence experience. He called on senators to reject the nominee."With this nomination, President Trump has shown again a lack of respect for the rule of law, for the intelligence community that Republican and Democratic presidents have all shown in the past," Schumer said.

 

Trump's formal submission to the Senate of Ratcliffe's nomination will allow him to extend for 210 days his appointment of Richard Grenell, the U.S. ambassador to Germany as acting director of national intelligence.

 

U.S. law would have forced Grenell to step aside as acting director on March 11 unless Trump announced another nominee.

 

The president named Grenell last month to replace Joseph Mcguire, who also served in an acting capacity, after an aide to the former Navy admiral and intelligence veteran briefed the House Intelligence Committee on Russian attempts to interfere in the 2020 presidential race.

 

Ratcliffe, who has been in Congress since 2015 and is a member of the House intelligence and judiciary committees, was an outspoken defender of Trump during the Democratic-led proceedings that resulted in Trump's impeachment last year on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

 

The Republican-controlled Senate acquitted Trump last month.

 

(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle, additional reporting by Jonathan Landay; Editing by Sandra Maler and Bill Berkrot)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-03-03

Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info

 

???? "Senate Leader", "Trump" and "intelligence" in one sentence...????

4 hours ago, webfact said:

"I hope Congressman Ratcliffe will impress Senators

Yes. Right. Sure. Okay Mitch.

yes, but who will nominate Trumps intelligence?

What a man to have the nerve to call for a bi partisan vote.

46 minutes ago, Jonnapat said:

What a man to have the nerve to call for a bi partisan vote.

I think he’s trolling only cowed republicans would vote for this unqualified yes man

Did Mitch also explain why this nominee is acceptable now as opposed to previously?

Oh gee another trump failure. He promised to get our troops out of the ME and now his deal is exploding already:

https://www.vox.com/2020/3/2/21161198/afghanistan-peace-deal-prisoner-exchange

Get in there and drain that swamp Mr. Ratcliffe, and who cares if it's bipartisan!

12 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Oh gee another trump failure. He promised to get our troops out of the ME and now his deal is exploding already:

https://www.vox.com/2020/3/2/21161198/afghanistan-peace-deal-prisoner-exchange

Aren't you off topic?

15 hours ago, Jonnapat said:

What a man to have the nerve to call for a bi partisan vote.

What he means is that the Dems should not adopt the nomination delaying/repressing tactics that Mitch is famous for. 

On 3/3/2020 at 7:48 PM, WalkingOrders said:

Aren't you off topic?

Only because you couldn't created a "fairytale" rebuttal 

Edited March 5, 20206 yr by Dap