6 minutes ago, CaptRon2 said:

Apparently your response to my questions is a childish video, which really has nothing to do with the leading nations questions. 

What is really sad is if us Americans are such idiots ,why is your country which was once a long time ago such a great national great nation so far behind us? Is that the joke you were talking about? You can’t keep pace with the idiots? Now I guess that is funny. 

I thought this was about trumps judicial appointees trying to remove women’s rights to choose not who is the biggest bully on the planet I guess I have a different definition of what makes a country great and it’s the pre trump ideal of American ideals oh well guess I’m old fashioned lol no not the vast majority of us Americans are disgusted with trumps world view 

8 minutes ago, stevenl said:

I think Trump has done worse with the judiciary, but that doesn't mean Schumer was right to say this. I don't think it was a threat, but a stupid remark he shouldn't have made it was.

Which the so called fake news media have condemned. But trump supporters will never do that to their idol.

16 minutes ago, CaptRon2 said:

Apparently your response to my questions is a childish video, which really has nothing to do with the leading nations questions. 

What is really sad is if us Americans are such idiots ,why is your country which was once a long time ago such a great national great nation so far behind us? Is that the joke you were talking about? You can’t keep pace with the idiots? Now I guess that is funny. 

I think you will find the US is actually behind other nations.on many things that the public consider important.

36 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Here, its not hard to find if actually try doing it yourself. Not only does trump undermine judges he also called roberts a disaster.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/03/trump-impeachment-john-roberts-chief-justice-trial

And you think that is the same as threatening a Supreme Court Judge?

If it is so easy to produce the reference why can’t you produce something?

pretty big difference in name calling and threatening, as you will be reading about during the censure.

Give us a break and try sticking with the truth.

5 hours ago, Skeptic7 said:

A woman should have the exclusive right to choose up to 2 trimesters. Fetus "viability" happens around 24 weeks or maybe a week or 2 sooner with medical advances since Roe v Wade 1973 ruling. 

 

See, I just don't know about this.

 

In cases where the the consummating act was consensual, and it does not represent a health threat to the mother, I think the father should have the option of legally converting the pregnancy into a compensated surrogacy arrangement. He would need to cover all expenses and compensation of course.  I understand very well the "my body, my choice" argument. I just don't agree with it. Not when so many other people's lives are affected by the choices made. That baby belongs to 2 people, and I think both parents deserve the right to decide the future of their offspring.  That is what the courts uphold in the event the woman chooses to have the child, and it should also hold in the event she chooses to abort the pregnancy.

 

I don't believe abortion should be criminalized, but I do think the father deserves the right to prohibit it. (There is, of course, an open question of how to prove you are the father early in the pregnancy. That would need to be addressed.) If one parent of either sex wants that baby though, the baby should be given the right to life. So I very much disagree with your adjective "exclusive."

 

 

2 hours ago, CaptRon2 said:

And you think that is the same as threatening a Supreme Court Judge?

If it is so easy to produce the reference why can’t you produce something?

pretty big difference in name calling and threatening, as you will be reading about during the censure.

Give us a break and try sticking with the truth.

So you think what trump did was.ok. got it. Trump is president so his bully pulpit is more real.

 

Perhaps you could indicate any poster agreeing with what schumer said.

Schumer went postal. Funny watching him melt down. Threatening judges on the SCOTUS is never a good look. 

Its not the first time he has given rise to threats ! He is a very angrey dem who has helped in dividing America imop. Don't worry though Roberts ,Gorshuc and kavanogh won't be intimidated!

Edited March 5, 20206 yr by riclag

6 hours ago, Sujo said:

I think you will find the US is actually behind other nations.on many things that the public consider important.

 Our laws and constitution have been around almost 250 years! The public can vote for their representation and most importantly whats good for America. What works  for some  doesn't necessarily work for others! America is still evolving . like many countries and still many want to come to this what you call behind country lol   

Edited March 5, 20206 yr by riclag

Can you imagine the outcry if a group of women were in control of whether a man could get a vasectomy or not?

18 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Bit surprised the article didn't bother to mention the most shocking part of this case. The most shocking by a country mile. And that is the senate minority leader, democrat Chuck Schumer has actually come out and publicly threatened the judges in the case. Can we just imagine for one second the meltdown if Trump had done similar?

 

'You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You will not know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions,' Schumer said, naming the two Trump appointees, according to video of the rally available online. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8076655/Trump-blasts-Chuck-Schumers-remarks-Justices-Kavanaugh-Gorsuch.html

 

 

17 hours ago, CaptRon2 said:

Great diversion, attack the source and ignore the statement.

The incident is readily available at many sources, it is a shame TopDeadSenter’s sources aren’t up to your standards, hopefully he will takes this into consideration in his future posts. 555

 

 

11 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Schumer went postal. Funny watching him melt down. Threatening judges on the SCOTUS is never a good look. 

 

10 hours ago, riclag said:

Its not the first time he has given rise to threats ! He is a very angrey dem who has helped in dividing America imop. Don't worry though Roberts ,Gorshuc and kavanogh won't be intimidated!

555555... You guys clutching your pearls about this are hilarious. Schumer was QUOTING what Kavanaugh said in his SCOTUS hearing... Hypocritical much?

1 hour ago, mikebike said:

 

 

 

555555... You guys clutching your pearls about this are hilarious. Schumer was QUOTING what Kavanaugh said in his SCOTUS hearing... Hypocritical much?

Gorsuch never threaten or incited  violence in front of a angry mob of leftest  activist! Schummer should ask for forgiveness to  Chief justice Roberts and his constituents .

Schummer has threaten the SC with violence . Could of dismissed it if it was the first time he has made threats but this nitwit went to far again. 

 

This guy said it sounded like a physical threat from CNN 

"It did sound like a physical threat"

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kristine-marsh/2020/03/05/cnns-toobin-roberts-rebuke-should-remind-dem-voters-how-important

Edited March 6, 20206 yr by riclag

52 minutes ago, riclag said:

Gorsuch never threaten or incited  violence in front of a angry mob of leftest  activist! Schummer should ask for forgiveness to  Chief justice Roberts and his constituents .

Schummer has threaten the SC with violence . Could of dismissed it if it was the first time he has made threats but this nitwit went to far again. 

 

This guy said it sounded like a physical threat from CNN 

"It did sound like a physical threat"

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kristine-marsh/2020/03/05/cnns-toobin-roberts-rebuke-should-remind-dem-voters-how-important

Are you having a coupla drinks this morning? No one mentioned Gorsuch.

13 minutes ago, mikebike said:

Are you having a coupla drinks this morning? No one mentioned Gorsuch.

Your misinformation is getting pretty tiresome. Once again, with a different source by popular request - here we go

 

"I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions," Schumer said, turning to look at the Supreme Court building.

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/04/politics/schumer-roberts-threats-supreme-court/index.html

3 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Your misinformation is getting pretty tiresome. Once again, with a different source by popular request - here we go

 

"I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions," Schumer said, turning to look at the Supreme Court building.

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/04/politics/schumer-roberts-threats-supreme-court/index.html

And he has apologised for these words.

 

I don't see a threat BTW.

correct me if i'm worng, but the proposed law does not restrict abortion rights.

 

from what i've read, the requirement that doctors performing abortion procedures have admitting rights at a hospital within 30 miles puts these procedures in line with all other outpatient surgical procedures.