Biden to give first interview responding to sexual assault accusation

[lannarebirth]

2 hours ago, sanuk711 said:

 

There is also due process...........Just like there was for Justice Kavanagh

I thought Brett Kavanaugh was a horrible choice for a SC Justice. He was way too political in his ideology and that is not suitable for meteing out justice. That said, his accuser has about 1/10th the credibility of Biden's accuser, despite the fact her "story" was widely embraced by the mainstream media, which let's face it,

is neoliberally aligned. Enter Biden.

[Chomper Higgot]

5 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

 

For God's sake why couldn't the Democrats come up with anyone better than Biden? There were at least a dozen (revised up from my previous count of 6) better candidates in the Democratic field. Why are they shoving this guy downour throats, other than the fact that he supports all the same interest groups as Trump. I don't think the Democrats even care if they win or lose at this point.

Because, as every other candidate concedes, he won in in the selection primaries would be a rather large clue.

[Chomper Higgot]

25 minutes ago, Canuck1966 said:

You've obviously never seen him touching children inappropriately or sniffing their hair

That's enough to make him a pervert or worse in my book

I’ve never read your book on perversion.

[Canuck1966]

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’ve never read your book on perversion.

what a pathetic response

[lannarebirth]

1 hour ago, Cryingdick said:

The dems can always hold the rape card and use it later if Biden is doing terribly. If so they can just produce another accuser who is suddenly credible and throw him under the bus. 

 

 

 

 

 

As you may or may not know, I was a Yang supporter during the primaries. Given her access to media, Yang's wife Evelyn came forward to accuse a prominent gynecolological doctor of sexual assault. Since nobody figured Yang's candidacy was going anywhere that would cause harm to TPTB she was widely believed. Because she was not attacked, that empowered 70+ other women to come forward to tell their similar stories about the doctor in question. There's never just one of these allegations, but if you kill the first person that comes forward, you'll never here from the others. Trump, at least, had the good sense to buy them off (for the most part).

[SymS]

Hide him until early November, play a pre-recorded speech right before the election, and he will win...
Don't let him speak on TV, let his wife do the talking instead.

[mr mr]

5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

32 minutes ago, Canuck1966 said:

You've obviously never seen him touching children inappropriately or sniffing their hair

That's enough to make him a pervert or worse in my book

I’ve never read your book on perversion.

dude your response is kind of creepy in itself. 

 

[Cryingdick]

7 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

 

As you may or may not know, I was a Yang supporter during the primaries. Given her access to media, Yang's wife Evelyn came forward to accuse a prominent gynecolological doctor of sexual assault. Since nobody figured Yang's candidacy was going anywhere that would cause harm to TPTB she was widely believed. Because she was not attacked, that empowered 70+ other women to come forward to tell their similar stories about the doctor in question. There's never just one of these allegations, but if you kill the first person that comes forward, you'll never here from the others. Trump, at least, had the good sense to buy them off (for the most part).

 

I am not sure we are in disagreement?

[lannarebirth]

1 hour ago, Cryingdick said:

Here is an honest question, did Bloomberg endorse Biden?

Why would Bloomberg care who wins now?

[lannarebirth]

1 hour ago, Tippaporn said:

Whether this or something else puts the nail in Biden's coffin I will predict that the Dems have another candidate who will replace Biden.  But be sure, they ain't going with Joe.

 

One would hope.

[Cryingdick]

2 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

Why would Bloomberg care who wins now?

 

He said he would dump money even if he wasn't the candidate. That's how he bargained his way into the last debate that proved to be his demise. After that the commercials aren't on TV anymore. He did promise.

 

Hey you!! Just stay inside!!

Edited May 1, 2020 by Cryingdick

[Cryingdick]

Can you imagine paying $4,000 a month for a studio in Manhattan when you can not leave your house?

[lannarebirth]

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Sad to see you handing down a verdict without a trial or any police or Grand Jury examination of the allegation.

 

Sad, but not at all surprising.

 

They are as right as you were about Trump.

[lannarebirth]

47 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I look forward to a swift, full and transparent investigation and charges being brought against the offender, either for sexual assault or bringing false charges.

 

My guess is Biden will vehemently deny the accusations and welcome a swift, full and transparent investigation.

 

I have never subscribed to the slogan/#tag ‘Women Must Be Believed’, but absolutely agree accusers must be listened to and that the Police must examine testimony and evidence regardless of who the accused is.

 

The allegation must be investigated, and must follow where testimonies and evidence leads it.

 

If Biden does not welcome and fully cooperate with the police inquiry, he should immediately step down.

 

I very much look forward to his response.

 

 

 

 

Biden going on MSNBC tomorrow is meaningless. Not sure which is the dog or which is the tail.

[lannarebirth]

30 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Because, as every other candidate concedes, he won in in the selection primaries would be a rather large clue.

 

What are they protecting that they would destroy down ballot elections? This is totally non-democratic.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8270881/Bernie-Sanders-demands-New-York-reinstate-Democratic-presidential-primary-canceled-coronavirus.html?fbclid=IwAR3eDFLJ_focEtMF7_hBVveg0ne8awEuFNcr0Gp1Z48z85LTut0Cq-_qcZg

[Canuck1966]

12 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:

Can you imagine paying $4,000 a month for a studio in Manhattan when you can not leave your house?

4k isn't even anywhere near top end either!

[Chomper Higgot]

4 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

 

Biden going on MSNBC tomorrow is meaningless. Not sure which is the dog or which is the tail.

Be assured, somebody making a public statement via a TV broadcast on a subject for which they know they are the subject of a police investigation is far from meaningless.

 

Perhaps you should consider joining me in supporting a swift, full and transparent investigation followed by a swift and full prosecution of which between Biden and his accuser has commuted a crime.

 

 

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

15 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

 

They are as right as you were about Trump.

Trump’s is currently immune from prosecution, I look forward to revisiting this when he is not.

[lannarebirth]

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Be assured, somebody making a public statement via a TV broadcast on a subject for which they know they are the subject of a police investigation is far from meaningless.

 

Perhaps you should consider joining me in supporting a swift, full and transparent investigation followed by a swift and full prosecution of which between Biden and his accuser has commuted a crime.

 

 

 

 

 

C'mon man. Biden going on MSNBC is exactly comparable to Trump going on FOX. Don't expect any "investigative journalism" to follow. Only apologists.

[Cryingdick]

9 minutes ago, Canuck1966 said:

4k isn't even anywhere near top end either!

Especially if you haven't gone outside lately.

[Chomper Higgot]

2 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

 

C'mon man. Biden going on MSNBC is exactly comparable to Trump going on FOX. Don't expect any "investigative journalism" to follow. Only apologists.

Anything Biden says on TV is admissible public record information/evidence.

 

This is interesting to ‘Investigative Journalism’ but very much more so to police and prosecutors.

 

Likewise much of what Trump has said on TV.

[lannarebirth]

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Trump’s is currently immune from prosecution, I look forward to revisiting this when he is not.

 

You got it backwards. You were right, and so are they in this case. Get him out of there quickly and maybe we can salvage this election. If not, look forward to 4 more years of the same (escalating) chaos.

[Cryingdick]

1 minute ago, lannarebirth said:

 

You got it backwards. You were right, and so are they in this case. Get him out of there quickly and maybe we can salvage this election. If not, look forward to 4 more years of the same (escalating) chaos.

Let's work on walking and chewing gum at the same time first.

[Chomper Higgot]

4 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

 

You got it backwards. You were right, and so are they in this case. Get him out of there quickly and maybe we can salvage this election. If not, look forward to 4 more years of the same (escalating) chaos.

You are jumping two guns.

 

1. The veracity of the allegations against Biden.

2. The outcome of the election.

 

The latter needs to be conducted free of any question on the former, so I ask again:

 

Will you join me in supporting a swift, full and transparent investigation followed by a swift and full prosecution of which between Biden and his accuser has commuted a crime?

Edited May 1, 2020 by Chomper Higgot

[lannarebirth]

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Anything Biden says on TV is admissible public record information/evidence.

 

This is interesting to ‘Investigative Journalism’ but very much more so to police and prosecutors.

 

Likewise much of what Trump has said on TV.

 

Biden knows he's in a (he said, she said) situation. None of it is "provable" other than in the court of public opinion, where I don't believe him for a minute. You are free to do so if it suits your dilletante political fancy. Know, you're destroying a human being in the process though.

 

[lannarebirth]

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You are jumping two guns.

 

1. The veracity of the allegations 

2. The outcome of the election

 

The latter needs to be conducted free of any question on the former, so I ask again:

 

Will you join me in supporting a swift, full and transparent investigation followed by a swift and full prosecution of which between Biden and his accuser has commuted a crime?

 

You must be joking. We have elected more than one KNOWN sexual assaulters only recently.

 

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, lannarebirth said:

 

Biden knows he's in a (he said, she said) situation. None of it is "provable" other than in the court of public opinion, where I don't believe him for a minute. You are free to do so if it suits your dilletante political fancy. Know, you're destroying a human being in the process though.

 

So It is fair to conclude you do not support a swift, full and transparent investigation followed by a swift and full prosecution of which between Biden and his accuser has commuted a crime.

 

[Cryingdick]

1 minute ago, lannarebirth said:

 

You must be joking. We have elected more than one KNOWN sexual assaulters only recently.

 

It will be the dems that decapitate Joe and eat his head politically.

[Chomper Higgot]

1 minute ago, lannarebirth said:

 

You must be joking. We have elected more than one KNOWN sexual assaulters only recently.

 

So let’s have an swift, full and transparent investigation to make sure we don’t repeat the mistake.

 

Where is your argument against doing so?

[Cryingdick]

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

So let’s have an swift, full and transparent investigation to make sure we don’t repeat the mistake.

 

Where is your argument against doing so?

Let's take our time for the truth to come out. Isn't that the approach before?