Hua Hin: Hotel pool villas razed to the ground after sparks fly from burning fields - 160 million baht damage in repeat of last year

 

Picture: Sanook

 

Sanook reported that firefighters battled a massive blaze at a luxury pool villa resort in Hua Hin on Saturday. 

 

The fire destroyed 47 villas causing damage estimated at 160 million baht.

 

If appears that the fire was caused after sparks from neighboring sugar cane and grasslands around the hotel caught fire.

 

It was the second time in just over a year since fire damaged the same resort. The resort is in Soi Sawat Mongkhon 1 in Hin Lek Fai sub-district. 

 

It was not named and was not occupied by any tourists due to being shut during the coronavirus pandemic.

 

Staff did what little they could to save items in the villas but flames were whipped up by high winds amid high temperatures.

 

In addition the thatched roofs of the villas and their glass construction style added fuel to the fire. Each villa has its own private mini-pool. 

 

Reported around 1pm on Saturday it was four thirty before it was fully under control. The road outside the hotel was closed off due to the danger of smoke causing accidents.

 

Prajuap Khirikhan provincial.police chief Pol Maj-Gen Surasak Suksawaeng has called an immediate investigation noting that the same hotel suffered a fire last year caused by sparks from the burning of fields nearby.

 

Sanook carried a report from April 21st of 2019 when 10 million baht damage was estimated in similar circumstances.

 

Each villa has an estimated value of 3.5 million baht.

 

Source: Sanook

 

 

-- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2020-05-18

 

- Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you

- Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates

Oops... i see a giant lawsuit here looming...

I hope not intentionally set as an act of revenge.  Once is an accident, twice is something else...

Just now, ThailandRyan said:

I hope not intentionally set as an act of revenge.  Once is an accident, twice is something else...

The farmers burn the sugar cane every year.

Some rich folk building a resort nearby ain't gonna stop 'em.

 

Maybe 'thatch' isn't the right roofing material to use here.

Edited May 18, 20206 yr by BritManToo

Each villa worth 3.5 million ? ???? 

5 minutes ago, chrisandsu said:

Each villa worth 3.5 million ? ???? 

well, it's a hotel, so the "villas" probably aren't very large.

2 minutes ago, tgw said:

well, it's a hotel, so the "villas" probably aren't very large.

When you are mass building like that those villas were probably built for less then a million . 

Just another example of bloody ignorant farmers, who dont give a s++t about neighbours.

42 minutes ago, webfact said:

around the hotel caught fire.

spontaneous  combustion  ,  I'm  sure as  all  burning  has  been  banned.

10 minutes ago, chrisandsu said:

When you are mass building like that those villas were probably built for less then a million . 

seeing the photos, yes, you are right

 

they also look as if the roof was made of leaves or straw or something similar atop of corrugated material.

43 minutes ago, webfact said:

police chief Pol Maj-Gen Surasak Suksawaeng has called an immediate investigation noting that the same hotel suffered a fire last year caused by sparks from the burning of fields nearby.

You  just  cant  fool  this  guy!

Next up hot property fire sale ????

6 minutes ago, colinneil said:

Just another example of bloody ignorant farmers, who dont give a s++t about neighbours.

If  only it were  just the farmers.

Gross exaggeration on value as always. 

37 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

I hope not intentionally set as an act of revenge.  Once is an accident, twice is something else...

its not my house everything is fine here.

 

i just get the occasional rock through the window. 

11 minutes ago, NCC1701A said:

its not my house everything is fine here.

 

i just get the occasional rock through the window. 

Are you sure its a rock ????

21 minutes ago, NCC1701A said:

its not my house everything is fine here.

 

i just get the occasional rock through the window. 

Yes we know it's not your house but thanks for telling us all

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

The farmers burn the sugar cane every year.

Some rich folk building a resort nearby ain't gonna stop 'em.

 

Maybe 'thatch' isn't the right roofing material to use here.

Thais are driving drunk all year long. If you have an accident with a drunk driver, it´s your fault?

They are not supposed to burn their fields. Not just because of fire hazards, but due to pollution. They need to be sued for all they are worth, particularly if they are part of the big business sugar conglomerates.

 

20 minutes ago, CNXexpat said:

Thais are driving drunk all year long. If you have an accident with a drunk driver, it´s your fault?

Easier to modify your behaviour, than to try and modify the locals behaviour IMHO.

1 hour ago, colinneil said:

Just another example of bloody ignorant farmers, who dont give a s++t about neighbours.

Unless it was a naturally caused fire. 

 

The article in the link stated that the land was abandoned, not cultivated, and didn't say that it was deliberate or caused by farmers burning their fields.  It did say that forensic police were investigating the cause in view of the previous similar fire which doesn't suggest "bloody ignorant farmers who don't give a s++t about neighbours", to use your words.

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

The farmers burn the sugar cane every year.

Some rich folk building a resort nearby ain't gonna stop 'em.

The Sanook link in the OP says that the land is abandoned, not cultivated. 

 

Including the link in the OP isn't going to stop some folk from reading it, though.

Edited May 18, 20206 yr by Bob A Kneale

4 minutes ago, Bob A Kneale said:

Unless it was a naturally caused fire. 

 

The article in the link stated that the land was abandoned, not cultivated, and didn't say that it was deliberate or caused by farmers burning their fields.  It did say that forensic police were investigating the cause in view of the previous similar fire which doesn't suggest "bloody ignorant farmers who don't give a s++t about neighbours", to use your words.

You must be in need of new glasses, it clearly states in the OP the fire came from burning fields.

Instead of trying to make me look stupid, as you do in many threads, you need to read slowly/ and correctly.

Or should we excuse you on the fact English is not your forst language?

34 minutes ago, KhunKenAP said:

They are not supposed to burn their fields. Not just because of fire hazards, but due to pollution. They need to be sued for all they are worth, particularly if they are part of the big business sugar conglomerates.

The Sanook link in the OP says that the land is abandoned, not cultivated. 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Bob A Kneale said:

The Sanook link in the OP says that the land is abandoned, not cultivated.  Including the link in the OP isn't going to stop some folk from reading it, though.

The land behind our home was not cultivated, yet it did not stop the ignorant owner from setting it alight, and almost cost many people here their homes.

 

1 minute ago, colinneil said:

8 minutes ago, Bob A Kneale said:

Unless it was a naturally caused fire. 

 

The article in the link stated that the land was abandoned, not cultivated, and didn't say that it was deliberate or caused by farmers burning their fields.  It did say that forensic police were investigating the cause in view of the previous similar fire which doesn't suggest "bloody ignorant farmers who don't give a s++t about neighbours", to use your words.

You must be in need of new glasses, it clearly states in the OP the fire came from burning fields.

Instead of trying to make me look stupid, as you do in many threads, you need to read slowly/ and correctly.

Or should we excuse you on the fact English is not your forst language?

I know that it said the fields were burning, it didn't say how they came to be burning, that is what is being investigated.  The land is abandoned.  I'm not trying to make anyone look stupid, I'm just making a rational observation based on reading the OP and the link.

 

"Or should we excuse you on the fact English is not your forst language?"

English definitely is not my "forst language" [sic]!

5 minutes ago, colinneil said:

The land behind our home was not cultivated, yet it did not stop the ignorant owner from setting it alight, and almost cost many people here their homes.

 

The Hua Hin land in question is abandoned land which suggests it may not have an identifiable owner!

Does make you wonder if the fire insurance would make up for no customers.

We're all blaming the farmers ....... but you never know.

Edited May 18, 20206 yr by BritManToo

2 hours ago, NCC1701A said:

its not my house everything is fine here.

 

i just get the occasional rock through the window. 

Keep your head down. Machine guns are on order but Lazada is dragging its heels.....????

The farmers are to be fined for not wearing facemasks and not maintaining social-distancing...????