Jump to content

UK government U-turns on England school exam grades after uproar


Recommended Posts

Posted

UK government U-turns on England school exam grades after uproar

By William James and William Schomberg

 

2020-08-17T161048Z_1_LYNXNPEG7G150_RTROPTP_4_HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS-BRITAIN-EDUCATION.JPG

Students wearing protective masks react outside the Department for Education as they hear the news of government U-turn on exam grades, amid the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in London, Britain August 17, 2020. REUTERS/John Sibley

 

LONDON (Reuters) - The British government bowed to public pressure over its school exam grading system, ditching an algorithm that downgraded the results awarded to students in England after their tests were cancelled due to COVID-19.

 

The government had faced days of criticism after the mathematical model used to assess grade predictions made by teachers lowered those grades for almost 40% of students taking their main school-leaving exams.

 

Students will now be awarded the grade that their teachers had predicted for them based on past performance, Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson's government said on Monday.

 

"I am sorry for the distress this has caused young people and their parents, but hope this announcement will now provide the certainty and reassurance they deserve," Education Secretary Gavin Williamson said.

 

He promised last week there would be no U-turn.

 

A snap opinion poll by YouGov showed 75% of respondents thought the government had handled the situation badly, and 40% thought Williamson should resign. Some students have been protesting against the initial results.

 

Asked if he would resign, Williamson said: "I think what those youngsters wanted to see was action being taken."

 

The chaotic handling of the grades has been felt as far afield as Egypt and Pakistan as some schools there rely on British assessments to secure internationally recognised qualifications.

 

The algorithm will also be dropped for results for separate exams taken mostly by 15- and 16-year-old students.

 

The dispute has damaged Johnson's core message to voters - that he wanted to get rid of barriers to achievement and help those from poorer backgrounds and areas fulfil their potential.

 

It marks a fresh embarrassment for a government which has changed course several times - including over meals vouchers for school children after a campaign led by soccer star Marcus Rashford.

 

Some students missed out on university places after they were downgraded several levels by the regulator's initial model.

 

"These were problems that were staring the government in the face for months and the government has been slow and incompetent," opposition Labour Party leader Keir Starmer said.

 

Williamson said he was lifting a cap on the number of students that universities can accept, but it is unclear how universities will handle the unprecedented revision of grades.

 

The Russell Group of leading British universities said it needed urgent clarification on additional government support.

 

The central British government's decision, which applies to England, mirrors those made by devolved administrations in Wales and Northern Ireland on Monday, and in Scotland last week.

 

Analysis of the algorithm showed it had resulted in "manifest injustice" of favouring students in fee-paying private schools, said Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank, writing for the Times.

 

(Reporting by William James; Editing by William Schomberg and Mark Heinrich)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-08-18
 
Posted
5 hours ago, Orac said:

Why they failed to recognise this as a problem before it happened, deal with it quickly when it did and effectively communicate with those affected just identifies how incompetent this govt is.

I think it's because central government doesn't deal with these things themselves, it takes time to reach the top, debate it and then force them to fix it. Whoever came up with this dumb idea needs to be fired, for sure it's not going to be a government minister.

 

It will be some nameless civil servant who's doing his bit to make the government look bad.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

quickly followed by utter capitulation.

Also known as listening to feedback. They could have just ignored any criticism but chose not to.

 

 

Posted

If the schools test scores averages were significantly higher than the past 5 to 6 years school performance , then they should’ve asked the school to submit the evidence for further evaluation.
I heard they adjusted the scores to match the past performance of the school. If the average test scores during Covid exams were 30 to 40% higher than the school’s past averages, they just lowered everybody’s scores to be in line with the school’s historical performance.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, 7by7 said:

Not for the first time, you are attempting to place all the blame for a government failure on some sort of conspiracy by civil servants.

With good reason, sometimes they really are out to get you.

Posted
16 hours ago, johnnybangkok said:

I run a business. The success of my business (although supported by many, many people) is ultimately MY success. Equally so, any failings in my business can be attributed to individuals if they are small and insignificant but if the business goes down, it’s ultimately my fault. 
why is that so different for the Tory party? The least they can do is to defer the blame  to lesser individuals and that must mean that Williamson goes. 
We’re not America where politicians get away with murder. There’s standards and accountability. How about we see some. 

If you have people working against you in your business you will get rid of them ,doesn’t matter if they are bending the rules or not , the pm or ministers cannot just dismiss people for that 

Posted
39 minutes ago, Foghorn said:

If you have people working against you in your business you will get rid of them ,doesn’t matter if they are bending the rules or not , the pm or ministers cannot just dismiss people for that 

Yes they can. It's been done many, many times before (although usually masked as a 'resignation'). There's such a thing as accountability and since this has been such an almighty c&ck up, someone needs to be held accountable. In my books that's Williamson. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

Yes they can. It's been done many, many times before (although usually masked as a 'resignation'). There's such a thing as accountability and since this has been such an almighty c&ck up, someone needs to be held accountable. In my books that's Williamson. 

And on another note; The Metro, Daily Star, The Guardian, The Times and even that bastion of far-right views The Daily Mail all have front pages demanding Williamsons resignation.

You see the Sword of Damocles swinging just over your head Williamson?.............................

Edited by johnnybangkok
  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...