Jump to content

Jailing of another small-scale farmer for encroachment sparks public outcry


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Puchaiyank said:

Land matters...money flow decides most of these disputes...not a sense of fairness or justice. 

It's the same the whole world over

Ain't it all a bleeding shame,

It's the rich wot gets the gravy

And the poor wot gets the blame

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

However, local farmers and netizens expressed solidarity with Saengduen, saying that large-scale landowners were immune from encroachment charges which resulted in jail for small-scale farmers.

And ain't that the truth? After all, the hi-so chicken farm chick is still successfully playing the biased system and so far has neither seen a jail cell from the inside nor had she to part with even a single baht:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, american2 said:

A stiff penalty for the farmer.  The farmer is in the wrong though.  Encroachment is a long time problem in Thailand.  The Government has to react or just give up.  

Of course the farmer is wrong. She broke the law. But the law should be applied equally to ALL wrong-doing parties including hi-so encroachers who seem to be under the impression that it's their god-given right to illegally occupy often hundreds of hectares of protected land without having to fear much in terms of legal consequences. And THAT is the gist of the article. And THAT is what's been incensing "netizens". And rightfully so.

 

While the farmer in the story has been sentenced in record time to 1 year in jail and a whopping 400,000 baht in fines, a hi-so madam who currently also is in the headlines for encroaching on a much, much larger scale, so far has escaped ANY legal punishment. And it very much appears that she will get away with it.

 

It's the bias with which the laws of this country are applied that is outraging the public. If a small-scale farmer is punished with 1 year and 400,000 baht for illegally occupying a comparatively small patch of land, the hi-so chick, who illegally took possession of several hundred rai of land, surely should be sentenced to 20 years and 400 million baht if the same judicial yardstick is deployed, right?. But she won't. Wanna bet?    

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

She was ruled not guilty after aerial photos of the area showed she had farmed the area since 1954, well before the forest reclamation policy came into effect under the 2014 post-coup regime. However, the prosecutor appealed that verdict in May and it was overturned

Seems harsh, but then again when I start to understand Thai law they change the rules again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

She was ruled not guilty after aerial photos of the area showed she had farmed the area since 1954, well before the forest reclamation policy came into effect under the 2014 post-coup regime.

Selective reading skills?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...