It's a dog whistle now for the alt right crowd.

 

https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/oct/15/look-behind-ny-post-headline-about-joe-biden-and-u/

Post with unapproved sources removed along with replies.  

Continued off-topic posting will earn suspensions.  The thread is not about Hunter Biden's laptop.  

 

You have been warned.  

 

11 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

BTW, you are promoting more false information on TVF.  It has not been proven to be a conspiracy theory.  If so, provide evidence, for searches produce nothing.  Neither has it been proven to be Russian misinformation.  In fact, to the contrary.  The FBI, DOJ and the DNI have publicly and emphatically stated that it is not Russian disinformation.

 

Fox News via MSN - FBI, DOJ agree Hunter Biden emails were not Russia disinformation

 

USA Today - DNI Ratcliffe: Russia disinformation not behind published emails targeting Biden; FBI reviewing

 

Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe said Monday that recently published emails purporting to document the business dealings of Hunter Biden are not connected to a Russian disinformation effort, . . . 

 

And I'll repost these links, which you obviously didn't read.

 

MSN link to The Washington Examiner - Cybersecurity expert says Hunter Biden email about former VP meeting Burisma official is authentic

 

The Washington Examiner - Senate committee verifies Bobulinski materials reviewed so far

 

You are either uninformed, which is excusable, or you are deliberately posting false information here.  There has been enough information on the Internet, some of it for quite some time now, which confirms the above.

 

EDIT: Scott, just noticed your comment above, posted whilst I was composing this response - hopefully OK to keep as a reply.

 

All the sources you reference are questionable, as is the sycophant Radcliffe. It is noteworthy that despite all the allegations no charges have been laid, even though trump is begging Barr to do so.

Edited October 31, 20205 yr by simple1

Just got Scott's warning after I posted my latest. ????

A post discussing moderation has been removed

12 hours ago, MaxYakov said:

I never had Twitter or FaceBook. I did see the questioning of Jack Dorsey by Sen. Cruz and what a disgusting tool Dorsey appeared to be - beard and all. Mark Zuckerberg, I don't know and don't want to. He certainly looks weird.

 

This reads more like a fashion statement.

Anyone who has been a Twitter user the past 4 years knows that Jack Dorsey of Twitter supported trump for an amazing amount of time before he finally had to put his balls on the line for the good of the world. Jack personally met with Donald Trump at least 2 times and many times his post should have been deleted because they violated the terms of service but did not get removed. Most liberals believe Jack is in the pocket of the conservatives but finally he has done the right thing because over all he is an American and he also is a human of the world and he had to stop the terrible things that were going on

Off-topic posts removed.  

Conspiracy post and replies removed.  

 

On 10/29/2020 at 1:01 AM, riclag said:

sixty five times they censored  the POTUS  biden- 0

"Twitter, Facebook have censored Trump 65 times compared to zero for Biden, study says"

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/twitter-facebook-have-censored-trump-65-times-compared-to-zero-for-biden-study-says

 

 

dorsy your a  liberal activist!

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/06/why-jack-dorsey-will-never-appease-conservatives

Ya think the swing voted doesn't see this  bias lol!

Thanks webfact for your post

 

 

So you cannot seem to understand that reality has a liberal bias and that trump constantly lies about everything?  I know you really want to live in a world like Orwells 1984 where republican "doublethink" (the ability to hold two completely contradictory thoughts simultaneously) becomes the norm but fortunately we are not there yet.

 

Any 10yo can see through bunker boy's constant contradictory lies and total incompetence at doing anything besides going bankrupt. His delusional cult followers just can't bring themselves to accept that.

Edited November 1, 20205 yr by shdmn

Twitter censors Trump for anything they find "offensive". The Ayatollah Kahmeini tweets he'll destroy Israel and it gets to stay. Who can take Twitter seriously? Obviously moderated by leftist clowns.

29 minutes ago, MajarTheLion said:

Twitter censors Trump for anything they find "offensive". The Ayatollah Kahmeini tweets he'll destroy Israel and it gets to stay. Who can take Twitter seriously? Obviously moderated by leftist clowns.

Why don't you just admit he's a racist instead of playing these games pretending your support of him is about something else?

Edited November 1, 20205 yr by shdmn

1 hour ago, MajarTheLion said:

Twitter censors Trump for anything they find "offensive". The Ayatollah Kahmeini tweets he'll destroy Israel and it gets to stay. Who can take Twitter seriously? Obviously moderated by leftist clowns.

Are you claiming that "leftist" are supporting Kahmenei?

4 hours ago, shdmn said:

Why don't you just admit he's a racist instead of playing these games pretending your support of him is about something else?

I would encourage you to come up with a topical and rational response. Accusing me of playing games does not forward honest debate. I prefer Trump for many reasons. I also oppose him on several important issues. Your assumption that you know it's about racism, without any basis in fact- well, consider it completely rejected and without any merit whatsoever. But do feel free to present some merit to go along with your accusation.

Edited November 2, 20205 yr by MajarTheLion
clarity

4 hours ago, candide said:

Are you claiming that "leftist" are supporting Kahmenei?

No. My words are/were very specific. I'm saying what I said.

24 minutes ago, MajarTheLion said:

I would encourage you to come up with a topical and rational response. Accusing me of playing games does not forward honest debate. I prefer Trump for many reasons. I also oppose him on several important issues. Your assumption that you know it's about racism, without any basis in fact- well, consider it completely rejected and without any merit whatsoever. But do feel free to present some merit to go along with your accusation.

From those who know him better than any of us here, and this is just a partial list.

 

"What a f**Deleted imbecile." -- Rupert Murdoch, owner FOX News
"An idiot with the intelligence of a kindergartner" -- General H.R. McMaster, National Security Advisor
"He has the knowledge of a 5th or 6th grader." -- General James Mattis, Secretary of Defense
"A f**Deleted moron" -- Rex Tillerson, Secretary of State
"An idiot surrounded by clowns" -- Gary Cohn, Economic Advisor
"A dope" -- General H.R. McMaster, National Security Adviser
"An idiot" -- Reince Preibus, Chief of Staff
"The depths of his dishonesty is just astounding to me. The dishonesty, the transactional nature of every relationship, though it's more pathetic than anything else. He is the most flawed person I have ever met in my life," General Kelly, Chief of Staff

29 minutes ago, MajarTheLion said:

No. My words are/were very specific. I'm saying what I said.

Comments from turncoat Republicans.

 

https://www.gq.com/story/gop-insults-hurled-at-donald-trump

Senator cruz, you elected him when you agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up and started using his platform.

2 hours ago, MajarTheLion said:

I would encourage you to come up with a topical and rational response. Accusing me of playing games does not forward honest debate. I prefer Trump for many reasons. I also oppose him on several important issues. Your assumption that you know it's about racism, without any basis in fact- well, consider it completely rejected and without any merit whatsoever. But do feel free to present some merit to go along with your accusation.

Good to see you on here. I've missed your excellent posts.

7 hours ago, shdmn said:

Why don't you just admit he's a racist instead of playing these games pretending your support of him is about something else?

I've never encountered a white racist who was happy for all his kids to marry Jews.

 

Back to the OP ........ 

I don't mind the big companies moderating my bad behaviour, but I don't like them moderating my personal opinion.

The big boys are clearly pursuing an agenda of de-platforming people who don't follow their social views, which is certainly less than idea in a supposedly free world.

 

They absolutely shouldn't be censoring the democratically elected 'leader of the free world' in any way, shape or form.

If he goes overboard, let the people choose at the next election.

 

Edited November 2, 20205 yr by BritManToo

43 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I've never encountered a white racist who was happy for all his kids to marry Jews.

 

Back to the OP ........ 

I don't mind the big companies moderating my bad behaviour, but I don't like them moderating my personal opinion.

The big boys are clearly pursuing an agenda of de-platforming people who don't follow their social views, which is certainly less than idea in a supposedly free world.

 

They absolutely shouldn't be censoring the democratically elected 'leader of the free world' in any way, shape or form.

If he goes overboard, let the people choose at the next election.

 

If you understand the US, you'll understand nobody has become president without the support of the local Jewish community.  No one.  Sheldon Adelson is just one of the MAJOR contributors to the GOP.  Mega donors.

 

Trump wasn't happy with her conversion:

https://www.jpost.com/omg/trump-was-baffled-by-ivankas-conversion-to-judaism-book-claims-584030

49 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I've never encountered a white racist who was happy for all his kids to marry Jews.

 

Back to the OP ........ 

I don't mind the big companies moderating my bad behaviour, but I don't like them moderating my personal opinion.

The big boys are clearly pursuing an agenda of de-platforming people who don't follow their social views, which is certainly less than idea in a supposedly free world.

 

They absolutely shouldn't be censoring the democratically elected 'leader of the free world' in any way, shape or form.

If he goes overboard, let the people choose at the next election.

 

The social media companies are just trying to keep out the fake news.  And content related to violence, abuse towards others, racial BS, etc, etc, etc.

 

Hard to argue with this.  Freedom of speech has it's limits, legally.

On 10/29/2020 at 7:19 PM, JusticeGB said:

Freedom of the Internet doesn't mean that bosses of the Internet can impose their political views on posts they disagree with on political issues. 

So Murdoch et al can do it in print and on television, but internet social media cannot???

Private companies, they can do as they please as long as it is legal,( and shareholders are ok with it) trying to prevent them by changing the laws is control that government should not have unless it is applied across all media outlets.

 

7 hours ago, RJRS1301 said:

So Murdoch et al can do it in print and on television, but internet social media cannot???

Private companies, they can do as they please as long as it is legal,( and shareholders are ok with it) trying to prevent them by changing the laws is control that government should not have unless it is applied across all media outlets.

 

In the USA Internet companies can't be sued for what is posted on their sites. However they remove posts they don't like and most of those posts are from Republicans. 

Off-topic, troll posts and replies removed.  Continue and face a suspension.

 

 

8 hours ago, JusticeGB said:

In the USA Internet companies can't be sued for what is posted on their sites. However they remove posts they don't like and most of those posts are from Republicans. 

Do Democrats write post such as Covid is less lethal than flu, children are totally immune, etc....?

Edited November 2, 20205 yr by candide

19 hours ago, Jeffr2 said:

Comments from turncoat Republicans.

https://www.gq.com/story/gop-insults-hurled-at-donald-trump

Great thing about that list is most of them later went on to support him, and some still are (like Christie).

Let's see what becomes of the hopefuls.  E.g. Pompeo is known for aspiring to the Oval Office.

 

 

10 hours ago, JusticeGB said:

In the USA Internet companies can't be sued for what is posted on their sites. However they remove posts they don't like and most of those posts are from Republicans. 

So just to be clear, you support Murdoch et al writing incorrect information, spreading dissention and encouraging antisocial behaviours, but internet companies are held to a different standard?

  

4 hours ago, bendejo said:

Great thing about that list is most of them later went on to support him, and some still are (like Christie).

Let's see what becomes of the hopefuls.  E.g. Pompeo is known for aspiring to the Oval Office.

 

Pompeo will never get to the oval office.  Too much baggage as a Trump boot licker. ????