Jump to content

Thai monk faces online backlash over abortion stance


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Thai monk faces online backlash over abortion stance

By Nanchanok Wongsamuth

 

2021-01-29T105119Z_1_LYNXMPEH0S0PB_RTROPTP_4_UK-THAILAND-WOMEN-BUDDHISM.JPG

Phra Shine Waradhammo, a Buddhist monk, holds a "stop condemning abortion" placard at a demonstration in front of parliament in Bangkok, Thailand on January 25, 2021. Photo courtesy of Krit Phromsakla Na Sakolnakorn/Thai News Pix

 

BANGKOK (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - A Buddhist monk known for his support for LGBT+ rights has sparked outrage among conservatives after he called for Thailand to decriminalise abortion.

 

Phra Shine Waradhammo was among about 20 pro-choice activists who protested in front of the Thai parliament this week, calling for all penalties to be revoked for women who choose to terminate a pregnancy.

 

"People were calling me 'garbage' and a 'hungry ghost in a saffron robe' on Facebook," the 52-year-old monk said on Friday, referring to comments under a photo of him holding a "stop condemning abortion" placard at the demonstration.

 

"Even when I spoke about LGBT+ issues a decade ago, I didn't receive as much criticism, probably because people see (abortion) as murder," he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

 

Abortion is opposed by many of Thailand's conservative Theravada Buddhism majority, who believe it goes directly against Buddhist teachings and that women who undergo a termination will be haunted by a ghost.

 

But on Monday, Thai lawmakers voted in favour of allowing abortion up to 12 weeks of pregnancy while retaining penalties for later terminations - a move pro-choice advocates said fell short of protecting the rights of the mother.

 

Under the amendment to an existing law, an abortion after 12 weeks would be allowed only in certain conditions and would otherwise be punishable by up to six months in prison, or a fine of up to 10,000 baht ($334) or both.

 

Phra Shine is an active user of social media and frequently posts about gender issues and sexual equality, and responds to questions and comments on how these relate to Buddhism.

 

In 2011, he wrote an opinion piece for a national magazine about the remains of more than 2,000 fetuses discovered by police at a Buddhist temple in Bangkok, calling for people to sympathise with women who undergo illegal abortions.

 

"Women who have an abortion are suppressed by religious teachings in the same way that LGBT+ people are suppressed by the moral system," he said.

 

"I see religion as being contradictory in that it wants people to reach nirvana, or the end of suffering, but why aren't people forgiven for committing sins instead of being berated, which will make them unhappy?"

 

Despite embracing many elements of Western-style democracy, Thailand has included Buddhist teachings into laws, such as banning gambling and rules on alcohol consumption, said Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang, a law lecturer at Chulalongkorn University.

 

"Morality has its own mechanisms for punishing those who commit sins, such as heaven and hell," said Khemthong, who has researched Thai law and religion.

 

"Why are we so fixated on killing as a sin but not on the quality of life of a child? In this era, Buddhism cannot survive by seeing things in a simplistic way."

 

(Reporting by Nanchanok Wongsamuth @nanchanokw; Editing by Michael Taylor. Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers the lives of people around the world who struggle to live freely or fairly. Visit http://news.trust.org)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2021-01-30
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The madness of Thailand---if you live in Pattaya, they have an abortion clinic attached to the Pattaya international hospital Soi 4. Its only accessible from the back Soi 5, & as I found out not accessible at all if your male.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RJRS1301 said:

Firstly one would have to believe inheaven or hell to believe that

I thought Thailand still had the death penalty, so state sanctioned murder is ok, but aborting a fetus is not, , and if the resultant child lives to be abused and or malnourished, work in basic servitude, thats ok>?

Good reflection ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a subject that will IMHO never end no matter what country you live in.

 

It is ongoing in the U.S. as well as almost every other country in the world.

Is there a solution I am not really sure.

 

While I understand that abortion in some cases is necessary and that it has merit my worry is that a lot of young women will start to think that it is a  convenience so they screw around get pregnant and then go get an abortion. Especially if it is covered under government medical plans.

 

Personally I think there needs to be a lot more education and responsibility training going on in the schools and in society about this and a lot of other things.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RJRS1301 said:

What about men taking some responsible actions, using condoms not 100% reliable when screwing around,, also cut down on the STI transmissions,  or is ok for men to screw around and not women?

What about men taking respionsibilty for birth control in relationships, and if no more children wanted in relationships having a vasectomy?

Why is it women have to carry the rsponsibilty for birth control when many cannot use contraceptive pills for many reasons?

Two people as you so eloquently say are "screwing" but one carries the major responsibilty.

 

Why is women who have carry the responsibilty 

cant see the male pill on the shelf  at the pharmacy ?

just think how much drug companies would lose in the long run.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by quake
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, quake said:

cant see the male pill on the shelf  at the pharmacy ?

just think how much drug companies would lose in the long run.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Think of how much humanity may gain if men did not mistake their penis for a brain.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, rooster59 said:

Thai monk faces online backlash over abortion stance

By Nanchanok Wongsamuth

 

2021-01-29T105119Z_1_LYNXMPEH0S0PB_RTROPTP_4_UK-THAILAND-WOMEN-BUDDHISM.JPG

Phra Shine Waradhammo, a Buddhist monk, holds a "stop condemning abortion" placard at a demonstration in front of parliament in Bangkok, Thailand on January 25, 2021. Photo courtesy of Krit Phromsakla Na Sakolnakorn/Thai News Pix

 

BANGKOK (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - A Buddhist monk known for his support for LGBT+ rights has sparked outrage among conservatives after he called for Thailand to decriminalise abortion.

 

Phra Shine Waradhammo was among about 20 pro-choice activists who protested in front of the Thai parliament this week, calling for all penalties to be revoked for women who choose to terminate a pregnancy.

 

"People were calling me 'garbage' and a 'hungry ghost in a saffron robe' on Facebook," the 52-year-old monk said on Friday, referring to comments under a photo of him holding a "stop condemning abortion" placard at the demonstration.

 

"Even when I spoke about LGBT+ issues a decade ago, I didn't receive as much criticism, probably because people see (abortion) as murder," he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

 

Abortion is opposed by many of Thailand's conservative Theravada Buddhism majority, who believe it goes directly against Buddhist teachings and that women who undergo a termination will be haunted by a ghost.

 

But on Monday, Thai lawmakers voted in favour of allowing abortion up to 12 weeks of pregnancy while retaining penalties for later terminations - a move pro-choice advocates said fell short of protecting the rights of the mother.

 

Under the amendment to an existing law, an abortion after 12 weeks would be allowed only in certain conditions and would otherwise be punishable by up to six months in prison, or a fine of up to 10,000 baht ($334) or both.

 

Phra Shine is an active user of social media and frequently posts about gender issues and sexual equality, and responds to questions and comments on how these relate to Buddhism.

 

In 2011, he wrote an opinion piece for a national magazine about the remains of more than 2,000 fetuses discovered by police at a Buddhist temple in Bangkok, calling for people to sympathise with women who undergo illegal abortions.

 

"Women who have an abortion are suppressed by religious teachings in the same way that LGBT+ people are suppressed by the moral system," he said.

 

"I see religion as being contradictory in that it wants people to reach nirvana, or the end of suffering, but why aren't people forgiven for committing sins instead of being berated, which will make them unhappy?"

 

Despite embracing many elements of Western-style democracy, Thailand has included Buddhist teachings into laws, such as banning gambling and rules on alcohol consumption, said Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang, a law lecturer at Chulalongkorn University.

 

"Morality has its own mechanisms for punishing those who commit sins, such as heaven and hell," said Khemthong, who has researched Thai law and religion.

 

"Why are we so fixated on killing as a sin but not on the quality of life of a child? In this era, Buddhism cannot survive by seeing things in a simplistic way."

 

(Reporting by Nanchanok Wongsamuth @nanchanokw; Editing by Michael Taylor. Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers the lives of people around the world who struggle to live freely or fairly. Visit http://news.trust.org)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2021-01-30
 


     I would think that once an unborn baby’s brain waves begin.... (usually around day 40) from that point on, it’s a sentient life with an active brain. 
   At that point, abortion for convenience sake....is murder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Time Traveller said:

And the unborn baby the boss of their own body.  Nothing more to say.

 

That is a completely unrealistic propostion, as everything the pregnant woman consumes, the enviroment living in, etc, has an effect on the unborn child and their development, or impairment

Edited by RJRS1301
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

It may well be cultural, but is that acceptable?

 

It is  to the Thai's, and seeing were are in Thailand it's acceptable - for you and myself, no - but we don't count. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2021 at 4:59 PM, RJRS1301 said:

What about men taking some responsible actions, using condoms not 100% reliable when screwing around,, also cut down on the STI transmissions,  or is ok for men to screw around and not women?

What about men taking respionsibilty for birth control in relationships, and if no more children wanted in relationships having a vasectomy?

Why is it women have to carry the rsponsibilty for birth control when many cannot use contraceptive pills for many reasons?

Two people as you so eloquently say are "screwing" but one carries the major responsibilty.

 

Why is women who have carry the responsibilty 

 

Fully agree.  People have to take responsibility

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Catoni said:


     I would think that once an unborn baby’s brain waves begin.... (usually around day 40) from that point on, it’s a sentient life with an active brain. 
   At that point, abortion for convenience sake....is murder. 

So guess it's ok to go ahead to full term so any unwanted child can either dumped somewhere convenient or to spend their early life being neglected and abused and screwed mentally for the rest of their lives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is a plain citizen then fair enough take whatever stand you wish. However he is supposedly a Buddhist monk, he mentions heaven and hell even though neither exist, and secondly goes on to encourage murder. I use that term as it legally describes a deliberate killing of a human being. True Buddhists don't even step on ants they are so loathe to kill. If he wants to take those views then take off the robes.

 

His views on LBGTB are fine as there is no conflict there, demonizing homosexuals is an Abrahamic Religious invention, just like the misconception that they describe as heaven and hell. What he is right about is that abortions will happen whether legal or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2021 at 9:35 AM, Lacessit said:

A progressive monk, good for him. Although there are still plenty of males around who think it is their right to tell women what to do with their bodies.

IMO the results of a plebiscite where only women were allowed to vote on the issue would be overwhelming.

Probably so... but the child wasn’t conceived alone... not very often anyway????but then I imagine most of the fathers in question aren’t accountable anyway. Sadly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...