Labour Ministry pledges help for Thai workers in Israel

[BestB]

Just now, Bluespunk said:

Nonsense. I have neither said nor implied such a thing.

 

Still waiting for the you quoting the post I made saying Israel is targeting civilians.

i already did, you insisting on deflecting is not going to change what you said

[Bluespunk]

Just now, BestB said:

i already did, you insisting on deflecting is not going to change what you said

No you didn't and the reason being I made no such claim.

[BestB]

3 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Google is your friend...

well you made the claims, so be kind enough to support it with little more than more deflections.

 

Fire away, whats your source of facts

[BestB]

Just now, Bluespunk said:

No you didn't and the reason being I made no such claim.

yeah you did and continue to do so, 

[Bluespunk]

Just now, BestB said:

well you made the claims, so be kind enough to support it with little more than more deflections.

 

Fire away, whats your source of facts

LOL, you accusing me of deflection...laughable.

 

Read the news, watch the news, google the reports...just avoid fox eh.

[BestB]

Just now, Bluespunk said:

LOL, you accusing me of deflection...laughable.

 

Read the news, watch the news, google the reports...just avoid fox eh.

great, which news?

[Bluespunk]

1 minute ago, BestB said:

yeah you did and continue to do so, 

Deflection deflection deflection, all because you made an erroneous claim.

[BestB]

Just now, Bluespunk said:

Deflection deflection deflection, all because you made an erroneous claim.

more blah blah and still does not change what you said and keep saying

[Bluespunk]

2 minutes ago, BestB said:

great, which news?

BBC, Guardian, Reuters, Times, etc., take your pick, just not fox eh...

[Bluespunk]

Just now, BestB said:

more blah blah and still does not change what you said and keep saying

Nonsense

[BestB]

Just now, Bluespunk said:

BBC, Guardian< Times, take your pick, just not fox eh...

what does BBC say? they are there on the ground?

 

RT had a video of a 10 year old poor little sweet Gazan girl, crying, for some unknow reason, even though she stood in the middle of demolished condo, which was just hit, surrounded by 5 more kids, not a single one had a cut or dirt or dust anywhere on them and for some reason this sweet and innocent 10 year old had a pair of breasts and spoke fluent English with London accent.

 

It was the news, so must be all true

 

 

[BestB]

3 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Nonsense

agree, no idea why you would insist on posting more though

[Bluespunk]

1 minute ago, BestB said:

agree, no idea why you would insist on posting more though

Lol, you made a baseless claim and rather than admitting you are wrong, you keep digging that hole.

[Bluespunk]

2 minutes ago, BestB said:

what does BBC say? they are there on the ground?

 

RT had a video of a 10 year old poor little sweet Gazan girl, crying, for some unknow reason, even though she stood in the middle of demolished condo, which was just hit, surrounded by 5 more kids, not a single one had a cut or dirt or dust anywhere on them and for some reason this sweet and innocent 10 year old had a pair of breasts and spoke fluent English with London accent.

 

It was the news, so must be all true

 

 

RT is no better than fox.

[BestB]

Just now, Bluespunk said:

Lol, you made a baseless claim and rather than admitting you are wrong, you keep digging that hole.

whatever makes you feel better to justify your nonsense

[Bluespunk]

Just now, BestB said:

whatever makes you feel better to justify your nonsense

You think it's nonsense to condemn the bombing of civilians?

 

Hmm...

[BestB]

1 minute ago, Bluespunk said:

RT is no better than fox.

oh i see, so its about picking and choosing which one suits your agenda. Got it

 

But i guess you once again failed to read or comprehend, RT was supporting your agenda.

 

 

[BestB]

1 minute ago, Bluespunk said:

You think it's nonsense to condemn the bombing of civilians?

 

Hmm...

So you AGAIN saying Israel targets civilians? but will deny it in your next reply?

[Bluespunk]

2 minutes ago, BestB said:

oh i see, so its about picking and choosing which one suits your agenda. Got it

 

But i guess you once again failed to read or comprehend, RT was supporting your agenda.

 

 

Agenda? Don't have one but I do recognise which news sources are suspect...I do object to the killing of civilians by anyone...but that's hardly an agenda

[Bluespunk]

Just now, BestB said:

So you AGAIN saying Israel targets civilians? but will deny it in your next reply?

Nope, targeting is a deliberate act to kill civilians. I have at no point said this is Israel's objective.

[BestB]

Just now, Bluespunk said:

Agenda? Don't have one but I do recognise which news sources are suspect...

so you agree then that RT video of a 10 year old gazan girl speaking fluent English is bs right?

[Bluespunk]

1 minute ago, BestB said:

so you agree then that RT video of a 10 year old gazan girl speaking fluent English is bs right?

I haven't seen it, but if it's RT I wouldn't trust anything they say. Same with fox.

[BestB]

Just now, Bluespunk said:

Nope, targeting is a deliberate act to kill civilians. I have at no point said this is Israel's objective.

good one, so Israel does not target civilians? but targets Hamas, who are hiding behind the civilians.

 

And it is wrong of Israel to do so and instead Israel should sit back and allow Hamas to continue firing 100 or so rockets per day every day into Israel civilians targets.

 

Did i sum up your stance close enough?

[BestB]

1 minute ago, Bluespunk said:

I haven't seen it, but if it's RT I wouldn't trust anything they say. Same with fox.

so once again, you agree that 10 year old gazan girl crying how Israel is killing her while speaking Queens English is utter bs? so whatever made you think similar reports are not?

[Bluespunk]

1 minute ago, BestB said:

so once again, you agree that 10 year old gazan girl crying how Israel is killing her while speaking Queens English is utter bs? so whatever made you think similar reports are not?

Because it is RT that I do not trust

[Bluespunk]

3 minutes ago, BestB said:

good one, so Israel does not target civilians? but targets Hamas, who are hiding behind the civilians.

 

And it is wrong of Israel to do so and instead Israel should sit back and allow Hamas to continue firing 100 or so rockets per day every day into Israel civilians targets.

 

Did i sum up your stance close enough?

I have repeatedly said both sides are wrong in what they are doing.

[BestB]

Just now, Bluespunk said:

Because it is RT that I do not trust

oh i see but if it was BBC with the same content then it would be ok, got ya

[Bluespunk]

Just now, BestB said:

oh i see but if it was BBC with the same content then it would be ok, got ya

The BBC is trustworthy. RT is not

[BestB]

Just now, Bluespunk said:

I have repeatedly said both sides are wrong in what they are doing.

and i repeatedly told you Israel did not start shooting rockets into Gaza, Hamas did and continues to do so while hiding behind the civilians. and it is not the first or second or even third time, but never ending occurrence 

[Bluespunk]

Just now, BestB said:

and i repeatedly told you Israel did not start shooting rockets into Gaza, Hamas did and continues to do so while hiding behind the civilians. and it is not the first or second or even third time, but never ending occurrence 

It doesn't matter what the reason, bombing civilians is wrong.