How many times do I have to explain this to you? There are an infinitesimally small number of Englishmen alive today who have a bloodline which can be traced back to the indigenous tribes of England. Those Englishmen living today - almost certainly including you and me - have ancestors from a combination of 'tribes' who were not indigenous to England, but were immigrants and/or invaders e.g. Romans, Angles, Saxons, Vikings, Normans, etc The phrase 'Ethnic English' therefore has little practical meaning if you apply it to Englishmen living today If you redefine the phrase 'Ethnic English' to include the tribes named in 2) as you do, then why not include latter day immigrants such as Africans? However, if you do so then the phrase - which has little practical value - loses even its' academic and semantic value. Being pedantic, many are Jamaican but, yes, they can trace their ancestry back to Africa. For the umpteenth time, I am not claiming that they are 'ethnically English'. They are no more 'ethnically English' than those of Roman, Angle, Saxon, etc blood. I called you a racist (and a liar) because that is what you are. You actively seek to highlight any perceived difference between white and non-white and when the irrationality of your argument is highlighted you cannot answer direct questions directly, but instead resort to lies - i.e. ascribing comments to me which I haven't made - and introducing tangential and irrelevant distractions. Sad and pathetic. I'm not anti-white, Jonny. As I have explained to you countless times, I don't do self-loathing and I am (generally) a rational person. Neither do I hate England or English culture. I'm proud to be English, especially of the fact that most of us are tolerant and welcoming. It's the racists that I despise. You remind me of the likes of Nick Griffin with your pseudo-intellectual attempts at justifying your racism.
Create an account or sign in to comment