Sadly not in that photo. One can only hope that he might have one when riding, but I personally wouldn’t bet on it. Quite a few details noted by the coroner, but no mention of motorbike licence or helmet. I would have thought both were relevant to the findings of the inquest, although clearly a ruling of death by road traffic accident. This statement by the coroner also intrigued me. “when he was hit by a car that was completing a u-turn.” It’s possible the car pulled out to do a u turn at exactly the moment he was passing it, but mostly I would say that a car pulls out and the motorbike hits the car. So no mention of the speed of the motorbike surprised me because once again it could have been a factor. At the end of the day I think the coroner just wanted the hearing over with and saw no point in causing distress to the family by mentioning aspects that might have cast a shadow over the deceased.
Create an account or sign in to comment