You must excuse me, but I have a little difficulty understanding your reasoning. I asked you to explain how it came about that your opinion regarding the need for immigration in Sweden to maintain, for example, the capacity of healthcare differed from that of all Swedish healthcare organizations, as well as municipal and county council organizations (the latter two are responsible for the elderly and healthcare in Sweden) - and you said that was false. In your last answer you wrote that it was not about unauthorized personnel or immigrants working in healthcare facilities. Then I do not understand what your statement has to do with the matter. You also mention Covid 19 and refer to an article Let me put it all in reverse chronological order. 2026 The Swedish government decides to withdraw all permanent residence permits. 2026 All Swedish healthcare associations, as well as municipal and county council associations, say that in healthcare we are already severely understaffed and you are threatening to expel 1/3 of our employed staff. 2019 – 2023 According to the Public Health Agency, this is the period during which Covid 19 lasted in Sweden. I don’t know if immigrants were employed for healthcare or care during this period, but generally speaking, a minimum of Swedish training as a registered nurse is required to work in Swedish healthcare. 2015 – 2016 During these two years, the largest refugee flows to Sweden took place. 2012 The article you refer to, Abuse in health care: a concept analysis, is published. It says the following in its conclusion. “Abuse in health care covers a phenomenon that has severe consequences, but is invisible if seen from a medical error or patient satisfaction perspective.” It does not mention immigrants, either as caregivers or care recipients. It does mention a case that could possibly be seen as a case of unauthorized personnel, but in positive terms. ”female homosexual patient (translated from Swedish) “There was an auxiliary nurse that came in and immediately understood who I was and treated us as a couple from the first moment… and it felt really comforting that there was someone who saw me and understood us… she grasped us directly.” Regarding the article, it tells me, based on how the authors present themselves and the format of the article, that it is a student essay. (I have been a student, as well as a researcher and teacher at Linköping University and a researcher at Politico de Milano in Italy). In summary, I have nothing against discussing, but then the arguments should stay on topic and not drift into irrelevant areas. That concludes this discussion for
