Quote

No significant increase in deaths among the vaccinated was uncovered, debunking one of the biggest current conspiracy theories surrounding the lockdown-banishing scheme

Ok.

So the original risk was diddly-squat and now treble that risk is also diddly-squat!

 

From the link:

 

"It equates to six cardiac deaths per 100,000 females vaccinated with at least a first dose of a non-mRNA vaccine"

This is NOT world news.

 

This is Daily Mail news.

 

Get a grip!

Despite the presumably intentionally vague headline written here by the Daily Mail, the UK study they're writing about did NOT find any meaningful increased risk from the mRNA COVID vaccines.

 

Instead, most of the study's findings relating to cardiac risk for young women relate to those who had primarily received the AstraZeneca (non-mRNA) vaccine, which, as the study notes:

 

"The subgroup who received non-mRNA vaccines are more likely to be clinically vulnerable. The ChAdOx1 Oxford Astra-Zeneca vaccine was withdrawn for people aged under 30 on 7 April 2021¹⁹, and until 8 June 2021 vaccination in this age group was limited to health care workers and people who were clinically extremely vulnerable.

 

People who were clinically extremely vulnerable may be at greater risk of adverse events following vaccination than the general population."

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-36494-0

 

And the Mail article alluded to the same complicating factor, with the following excerpt:

 

"Researchers said young women given non-mRNA jabs in the period studied tended to be classified as clinically vulnerable, hence why they were prioritized for jabs.

 

This factor may have explained their increased risk of death, the team suggested."

 

On 3/28/2023 at 3:13 PM, simon43 said:

So the original risk was diddly-squat and now treble that risk is also diddly-squat!

That was the same story for the Covid virus itself for most age groups where vaccination reduced a diddly-squat risk to a diddly-diddly-squat risk. It didn't stop governments becoming totally unglued and demanding everyone get vaccinated, though.

 

It's a pity that the "health experts" never understood (or pretended not to) the difference between relative risk reduction (RRR) and absolute risk reduction (ARR).

That article also states:

 

Quote

However, the study doesn't directly prove that any deaths were caused by any vaccine.

 

Fatalities could, for example, have been from an unrelated health condition or even a Covid infection itself given the virus is known to cause similar cardiac effects. 

 

Daily Mail! ????

 

Are you not embarrassed to start a thread about science and medicine by quoting the Daily Mail?? ????

On 3/31/2023 at 5:54 PM, Eleftheros said:

That was the same story for the Covid virus itself for most age groups where vaccination reduced a diddly-squat risk to a diddly-diddly-squat risk. It didn't stop governments becoming totally unglued and demanding everyone get vaccinated, though.

 

It's a pity that the "health experts" never understood (or pretended not to) the difference between relative risk reduction (RRR) and absolute risk reduction (ARR).

Over a million people died in America from Covid-19. That is far from diddly-squat.

Misleading post with false claims removed along with a troll post