Leading with that would have been more clear - there was nothing in the report stating that the minors had 'denounced' their Thai citizenship - the report simply stated expired Thai passports - highlighting the are Thai. How can a parent prove they are the parents ? - Birth Certificate / Passports / Expired Passports etc. This mother had no less information at hand than we all possess - my point here being, if my child were to fly into Thailand and met the same difficult immigration officer, how could I prove that I am the father - I only have a Birth Certificate and Thai and UK Passports. Thus: Exactly what more could the Immigration officer be asking for, for parental proof ? - many dual nationals carry a different name from the mother as in many cases a married mother may not go through the process of officially changing their name to the husbands family name. It seems the only thing 'missing' was certified consent from parents or guardians for the trip - but consent certified by who exactly ? How can 'anyone' prove that - my childs Birth Certificate simply has his name, my name, mums name - theoretically - this Birth Certificate stated the same - unless the Childrens names has changed - travelling under a Chinese Passport with Chinese names etc. I'd assume that as the Passports expired the photo's were older. Maybe the names in the Birth Certificates were not the same as those in the expired passports - if thats the case there are missing key details in the information reported. Not every Thai of dual citizenship has a Thai ID card - I know plenty of parents of mixed kids who have not secured Thai ID cards for their children. Thats not quite true - Immigration cannot deny entry to 'Thai citizens' and unless (as you have) they denounced their Thai citizenship officially - then they are still Thai Citizens - unless of course, as you pointed out - the expired passports are not theirs. The reporting indicates they are Thai citizens and the mother was the real mother - the mother is the one who went public. Its also reported that The children, aged 17 and 15 (boy and girl think), usually travel to Thailand during school holidays to visit her and other family members - so they 'theoretically' have a travel history within the Immigration records. Thats the alarming thing about this story - if there's a difficult immigration officer how can parenting be actually 'proven' if they decide to 'contest' your claims. Perhaps there is key missing information - or this was an immigration officer being very very awkward.
Create an account or sign in to comment