Troll posts and those with unsubstantiated and unsupported claims have been removed.

2 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

""I've heard Joe Biden say that he's never discussed business with Hunter. That is false. I have firsthand knowledge about this because I directly dealt with the Biden family, including Joe Biden," Bobulinski said at the press conference. Contacted this week by CBS News, Bobulinski said he stands behind those statements."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-tony-bobulinski-former-business-partner-grand-jury/

 

worth reading that whole article if anyone wants to be properly informed about both the witness evidence against Joe Biden and also the efforts made by the alphabet agencies to avoid having to investigate him. Looks like corruption. Lots of it.

Right. Tony Bobulinski. This the same Tony Bobulinski who claimed that he had incriminating evidence against Joe Biden on his cell phones. Reporters from the Wall St. Journal, owned by Rupert Murdoch, examined the contents of his phones and found nothing that incriminated Joe Biden. Nothing.

 

WSJ Newsroom Found No Joe Biden Role in Hunter Deals After Reviewing Bobulinski's Records

The Wall Street Journal newsroom has found that texts and emails recently given to the publication by Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter Biden, the son of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, provide no evidence that Joe ever used his political standing as a former vice president to aid Hunter's business dealings in China.

https://www.newsweek.com/wsj-newsroom-found-no-joe-biden-role-hunter-deals-after-reviewing-bobulinskis-records-1541553

 

Ex-Hunter Biden associate's records don't show proof of Biden business relationship amid unanswered questions
Tony Bobulinski had claimed the former VP was involved in discussions about his son's dealings overseas

Ex-Hunter Biden associate's records don't show proof of Biden business relationship amid unanswered questions | Fox News

3 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

""I've heard Joe Biden say that he's never discussed business with Hunter. That is false. I have firsthand knowledge about this because I directly dealt with the Biden family, including Joe Biden," Bobulinski said at the press conference. Contacted this week by CBS News, Bobulinski said he stands behind those statements."

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-tony-bobulinski-former-business-partner-grand-jury/

 

worth reading that whole article if anyone wants to be properly informed about both the witness evidence against Joe Biden and also the efforts made by the alphabet agencies to avoid having to investigate him. Looks like corruption. Lots of it.

From your source:

 

""We were at the Four Seasons and we were having lunch and (Joe Biden) stopped in, just said 'hello' to everybody. I don't even think he drank water. And I think Hunter Biden said, 'I may be trying to start a company or try to do something with these guys and could you?'  And I think (Joe Biden) was like, 'if I'm around' and he'd show up," Walker said, according to Shapley."

 

Is that the business discussion you are referring to?  It doesn't seem like much of a discussion to me.

Trolling meme removed. If that's all you  can offer then move on

5 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

No need to use the IF word. No need for confusion, doubt or muddle. Because we KNOW for a fact where Hunter was when he sent the threatening messages demanding money from the Chinese. He was at Joe's house.

 

"Hunter Biden texted his Chinese business partners demanding $10 million, warning them 'I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father' – as a photo of the First Son saved on his laptop shows he was at Joe Biden's home that day."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12227585/Hunter-Biden-seen-photo-taken-outside-Joes-Delaware-home-day-sent-damning-text.html

 

God bless this laptop. Without that, proper investigative journalists and the whistleblowers the bidens and their PROTECTORS would have gotten clean away with it all. We should all be thankful justice will be (belatedly) served.

 

 

We don't KNOW for a 'fact' where Hunter was when he sent that message.

 

I suggest that this is just your opinion based on information from questionable sources.

 

Please point to in your article where it gives evidence that Hunter was sitting with Joe at the same time that he sent that message.

 

Hunter could have be anywhere, as could Joe.

 

Hunter could even be lying, as it is a known fact that some people do lie.

 

3 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Hunter could even be lying, as it is a known fact that some people do lie.

You think Hunter would lie about something that could cause his father to be jailed?

6 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

No need to use the IF word. No need for confusion, doubt or muddle. Because we KNOW for a fact where Hunter was when he sent the threatening messages demanding money from the Chinese. He was at Joe's house.

 

"Hunter Biden texted his Chinese business partners demanding $10 million, warning them 'I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father' – as a photo of the First Son saved on his laptop shows he was at Joe Biden's home that day."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12227585/Hunter-Biden-seen-photo-taken-outside-Joes-Delaware-home-day-sent-damning-text.html

 

God bless this laptop. Without that, proper investigative journalists and the whistleblowers the bidens and their PROTECTORS would have gotten clean away with it all. We should all be thankful justice will be (belatedly) served.

PLEASE stop using the word WE.

 

You speak for yourself only, and NOT for everybody else in the world. You certainly do NOT speak for me.

 

Your other problem is, as usual, you cannot produce ANY proof of anything.

 

quote from your post

 

"Hunter Biden texted his Chinese business partners demanding $10 million, warning them 'I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father' – as a photo of the First Son saved on his laptop shows he was at Joe Biden's home that day."

 

What is that proof of?

 

It is easy to change the time/date group of any post, photo or email and proves exactly nothing, especially as the laptop "disappeared' for a year.

 

Photos can be 'photoshopped' even on your own mobile/tablet/pc by anybody, and if they are good enough there will be no trace left behind.

 

As many posters, including me, constantly ask you,

 

WHERE is your proof that can be taken to a court and successfully prosecuted?

30 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

You think Hunter would lie about something that could cause his father to be jailed?

First off, I've got news for you: Joe Biden was just a private citizen when Hunter Biden made his threat. So what charges could Joseph Biden be prosecuted for?

In addition, even if Biden could be charged for something, Hunter Biden was an active addict. You think that's a reason that he would be careful not to implicate anyone else?

38 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

 

 

We don't KNOW for a 'fact' where Hunter was when he sent that message.

 

I suggest that this is just your opinion based on information from questionable sources.

 

Please point to in your article where it gives evidence that Hunter was sitting with Joe at the same time that he sent that message.

 

Hunter could have be anywhere, as could Joe.

 

Hunter could even be lying, as it is a known fact that some people do lie.

 

Even if he and his father were not just in the same house, but  in the same room, so what? If Hunter is sending emails via his computer, that's hardly proof that his father was aware of them.

7 minutes ago, billd766 said:

PLEASE stop using the word WE.

 

You speak for yourself only, and NOT for everybody else in the world. You certainly do NOT speak for me.

 

Your other problem is, as usual, you cannot produce ANY proof of anything.

 

quote from your post

 

"Hunter Biden texted his Chinese business partners demanding $10 million, warning them 'I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father' – as a photo of the First Son saved on his laptop shows he was at Joe Biden's home that day."

 

What is that proof of?

 

It is easy to change the time/date group of any post, photo or email and proves exactly nothing, especially as the laptop "disappeared' for a year.

 

Photos can be 'photoshopped' even on your own mobile/tablet/pc by anybody, and if they are good enough there will be no trace left behind.

 

As many posters, including me, constantly ask you,

 

WHERE is your proof that can be taken to a court and successfully prosecuted?

As far as criminality goes,it doesn't matter even if it could be proved that Joe Biden was present and acquiesced in the threat. The fact is he wasn't a government official when the threat was made, so what would be the charge?

2 minutes ago, placeholder said:

As far as criminality goes,it doesn't matter even if it could be proved that Joe Biden was present and acquiesced in the threat. The fact is he wasn't a government official when the threat was made, so what would be the charge?

Willfully and deliberately conducting business with Chinese people. Who would do that?

1 hour ago, Neeranam said:

You think Hunter would lie about something that could cause his father to be jailed?

Perhaps, I will ask you a question?

 

Would you ever think in your wildest dreams, that someone could be so low as to lie and cause more than 250 of his supporters to be jailed ?

Interesting

 

In the letter, Lowell questions why Republicans circulated reportedly fake images of the alleged WhatsApp messages involving Hunter......

"The screen-grab images you posted are not real and contain myriad of issues," Lowell explained, adding that the alleged WhatsApp messages did not resemble the platform and appeared altered.

"[B]oth images portray the message in a blue bubble, when WhatsApp messages are in green; one image super-imposed the Chinese flag for the contact ID," Lowell described. 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-bidens-lawyer-explodes-ways-means-committee-obsession-doj-investigation

 

After Jim Jordan caught lying about a testimony, who would be surprised?

Edited July 1, 20233 yr by candide

10 hours ago, Tug said:

Inflation due to the pandemic greed and supply chain issues all inherited from the previous administration we are taming that beast further more the Biden’s lost their son due to exposure to toxic carcinogenic chemicals from burn pits in Iraq from his honorable service to the United States of America I sincerely hope that clears up your obvious confusion about that grevious burden on the Biden family is enduring as this administration continues to shoulder the heavy responsibility of guiding our nation during these perilous times 

More like guiding our nation into these perilous times 

2 hours ago, LosLobo said:

 

 

We don't KNOW for a 'fact' where Hunter was when he sent that message.

 

I suggest that this is just your opinion based on information from questionable sources.

 

Please point to in your article where it gives evidence that Hunter was sitting with Joe at the same time that he sent that message.

 

Hunter could have be anywhere, as could Joe.

 

Hunter could even be lying, as it is a known fact that some people do lie.

 

Yes, he could even be lying, but still peddling. 

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

First off, I've got news for you: Joe Biden was just a private citizen when Hunter Biden made his threat. So what charges could Joseph Biden be prosecuted for?

In addition, even if Biden could be charged for something, Hunter Biden was an active addict. You think that's a reason that he would be careful not to implicate anyone else?

The agreement could have been made while Joe was still VP?

Just now, nauseus said:

The agreement could have been made while Joe was still VP?

Are you claiming that this email is evidence of that? If not, it's irrelevant.

4 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Yes, he could even be lying, but still peddling. 

 

There are possibilities many in life.

 

But a possibility is not evidence.

29 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Yes, he could even be lying, but still peddling. 

He could even be telling the truth, and a few members here on ANN wouldn't believe him.

 

 

30 minutes ago, nauseus said:

The agreement could have been made while Joe was still VP?

More whataboutery.

 

Proof is necessary for a successful prosecution.

 

Do you have any?

6 minutes ago, billd766 said:

He could even be telling the truth, and a few members here on ANN wouldn't believe him.

 

 

More whataboutery.

 

Proof is necessary for a successful prosecution.

 

Do you have any?

If I knew he was telling the truth of course I'd believe him.

 

We are not in court. My other comment just suggests another possibility.

43 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Are you claiming that this email is evidence of that? If not, it's irrelevant.

No. I'm saying that it is possible that if some payment was arranged, then that arrangement could have been made while Joe was still VP.

 

If that were to be the case then it is very relevant. After all, by the wording of the text, Hunter seems pretty miffed. Maybe he had been waiting for a long time? 

52 minutes ago, nauseus said:

The agreement could have been made while Joe was still VP?

"Could"

2 minutes ago, candide said:

"Could"

Yes. Could.

 

Please stop chopping up and editing my posts for effect. That's shabby. 

11 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Yes. Could.

 

Please stop chopping up and editing my posts for effect. That's shabby. 

Please stop complaining about something which did not happen. Your post was fully quoted and not edited. 

I just highlighted the convenient use of "could".

27 minutes ago, nauseus said:

No. I'm saying that it is possible that if some payment was arranged, then that arrangement could have been made while Joe was still VP.

 

If that were to be the case then it is very relevant. After all, by the wording of the text, Hunter seems pretty miffed. Maybe he had been waiting for a long time? 

And what was illegal about the deal between CEFC and Hunter and his partners?

2 minutes ago, candide said:

And what was illegal about the deal between CEFC and Hunter and his partners?

Ah. Now you've allowed my full post this time. So gracious.

 

I didn't use the word illegal. You did. Got something to share there?

 

 

52 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Ah. Now you've allowed my full post this time. So gracious.

 

I didn't use the word illegal. You did. Got something to share there?

 

 

Stop it, Your post was fully quoted!

3 hours ago, nauseus said:

If I knew he was telling the truth of course I'd believe him.

 

We are not in court. My other comment just suggests another possibility.

What more proof do you need?

 

Now you see the problem.

 

President Biden and his son BOTH deny what happened and there was nobody else present, yet you and many others will not accept they are telling the truth.

 

To go slightly off topic, I and many others here on ANN have a similar problem with ex-president Trump.

 

The major difference, is that Trump is a proven liar, whereas President Biden is not.

 

 

That's outrageous!!

How could he not have been when his son was texting the Chinese official?

I know when ever I text someone my father is always there I am sure yours  is always there when you text. 

In fact he is standing right next to me as I am writing this nodding his head in approval his face beaming with  pride for my exceptional writing skills. 

reported off topic ethnic slur removed