13 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Why didn't Pita compromise?

Obviously I don't know, but I have an idea.

If he had, he likely still wouldn't become PM, and even if he did, it would be a hollow win to have betrayed his voters, just another corrupt politician who doesn't stick to any core principles. 

But going down "pure" as he's a young man, perhaps he's playing the long game. 

A martyr as it were for Thai democracy. No guarantee such a gamble will even bear fruit, but at least he can look himself in the mirror without barfing.

I would agree if MF had won sufficient seats without needing a coalition . 

Is it right that he should sacrifice all his other policies for amending section 112. Why does he hold amending section 112 so sancrement at the expense of others.

I would prefer he compromised on section 112 ,( don't fight the battles you cannot win) and implemented the issues that improve the Thai people.

4 minutes ago, cleopatra2 said:

Why does he hold amending section 112 so sancrement at the expense of others.

Because it is the main issue in this banana republic, as it is used against everyone who dares to reveal the truth

4 minutes ago, cleopatra2 said:

I would agree if MF had won sufficient seats without needing a coalition . 

Is it right that he should sacrifice all his other policies for amending section 112. Why does he hold amending section 112 so sancrement at the expense of others.

I would prefer he compromised on section 112 ,( don't fight the battles you cannot win) and implemented the issues that improve the Thai people.

Given the structure of the Thai constitution, I think its IMPOSSIBLE for any candidate to win enough seats without the need for the senators.

You would prefer?

Again, as I explained, that doesn't mean he would have won, and then he would have been soiled, and his young base would not have been impressed with that.

21 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Why didn't Pita compromise?

Or do what Prayuth was good at. Say one thing then do another.

 

There won't be a coup

I won't cling to power

I will return happiness to the Thai people.

 

Unfortunately , it's all history repeating itself now. Just hope they have learnt their lesson. Move Forward will likely not be around to contest the next election. However, if it resurrects itself again for the third time it will have to walk on eggs and make sure it is absolutely safe from any legal proceedings. If it can manage this , it will surely win a landslide.

 

Even then .....history could repeat itself for the 23rd time.

Struth, I sure picked a bad day to quit drinking.

8 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Given the structure of the Thai constitution, I think its IMPOSSIBLE for any candidate to win enough seats without the need for the senators.

You would prefer?

Again, as I explained, that doesn't mean he would have won, and then he would have been soiled, and his young base would not have been impressed with that.

Of course it's possible.

There are 500 seats to be won.

17 minutes ago, cleopatra2 said:

I would agree if MF had won sufficient seats without needing a coalition . 

Is it right that he should sacrifice all his other policies for amending section 112. Why does he hold amending section 112 so sancrement at the expense of others.

I would prefer he compromised on section 112 ,( don't fight the battles you cannot win) and implemented the issues that improve the Thai people.

Pita doesn't seem like one of those snake-like, slimy politicians who make promises before the election and break promises after the election, ultimately betraying their electorate. He has his ideals and stands by them. Unfortunately, Thailand is missing again another great opportunity for a better future, especially the younger Thai generation.

Edited July 19, 20233 yr by tomacht8

10 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Given the structure of the Thai constitution, I think its IMPOSSIBLE for any candidate to win enough seats without the need for the senators.

You would prefer?

Again, as I explained, that doesn't mean he would have won, and then he would have been soiled, and his young base would not have been impressed with that.

So is amending section 112 more important than MF party promise to give pensioners 3000 baht every month.

3 minutes ago, cleopatra2 said:

Of course it's possible.

There are 500 seats to be won.

Like winning the powerball lottery is possible.

Realistically, it is not.

1 minute ago, tomacht8 said:

Pita doesn't seem like one of those snake-like, slimy politicians who make promises before the election and break promises after the election, ultimately betraying their electorate. He has his ideals and stands by them. Unfortunately, Thailand is missing another great opportunity for a better future, especially for the younger Thai generation.

If that is the case why did the MF party leave out of the MOU the section 112 amendment.

2 hours ago, webfact said:

Move Forward PM candidate Pita Limjaroenrat will try again today to secure the premiership.

Just been shot down in flames.

13 minutes ago, cleopatra2 said:

So is amending section 112 more important than MF party promise to give pensioners 3000 baht every month.

I will not be discussing that section with you or anyone else, as per the laws of Kingdom of Thailand. 

I'm an expat. 

This isn't my fight.

I'm just watching. 

Edited July 19, 20233 yr by Jingthing

15 minutes ago, cleopatra2 said:

If that is the case why did the MF party leave out of the MOU the section 112 amendment.

It makes no difference. Pita and the coalition are a threat to the establishment and the rich. 112 is just an advanced argument, just like the share theater or the accusation that Pita is too young. What we experience in life is that the powerful want to keep their power with all conceivable tricks and means. A small minority with a supposedly high status commands the majority and reduces their votes to nothing.

Edited July 19, 20233 yr by tomacht8

When you cannot even use the adjective 'fledgling' in front of democracy and keep a straight face.........