Jump to content

UFOs: Is the government hiding something?


Social Media

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, heybruce said:

You really need to tell us, with supporting sources, what your investigations of these secret works have revealed.

 

BTW:  I'm retired USAF.  I was once in on many secrets.  All of them addressed real threats, not fantasies.

What was your rank? I would think if there are secrets it's compartmentalized so no one knows the entire story. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Lazar

 

Lazar purports to have examined an alien craft and read US government briefing documents that described alien involvement in human affairs over the past 10,000 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, hotchilli said:

Absolutely yes... if the military can claim that UAP's are an existential threat from possible action, the military can further justify a budget to increase their weaponisation, and protection of American soil.

That's how it works.

Show us where anybody in the military ever used that argument and to whom. This is just an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the vastness of space and the technical/logistic achievement necessary to travel the unimaginable distances and add to that the fact that our sun is the wrong type to interest potential long distance space explorers. I am happy with my opinion that no one is coming.????

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/25/2023 at 5:43 PM, giddyup said:

There is no way the Egyptians created some of their masterpieces like the 100 ton granite stone boxes at the Serapeum using copper chisels and pounding stones

You forgot . and lots and lots of slaves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sirineou said:

You forgot . and lots and lots of slaves. 

...and lots and lots of time. Something oft forgotten.

 

I smile at the "What if we built it today" TV programs. Their projects are not planned on a 25 year schedule 

Edited by VocalNeal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, sirineou said:

You forgot . and lots and lots of slaves. 

No, that's a myth.

 

According to noted archeologists Mark Lehner and Zahi Hawass, the pyramids were not built by slaves; Hawass's archeological discoveries in the 1990s in Cairo show the workers were paid laborers, rather than slaves. Rather, it was farmers who built the pyramids during flooding, when they could not work their lands.

Edited by giddyup
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sirineou said:

"There were three types of enslavement in Ancient Egypt: chattel slavery, bonded labor, and forced labor.  "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_ancient_Egypt#:~:text=There were three types of,people of various social ranks.

Read the section on the pyramids. Still doesn't explain how great works of art were created using primitive tools.

Edited by giddyup
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

What was your rank? I would think if there are secrets it's compartmentalized so no one knows the entire story. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Lazar

 

Lazar purports to have examined an alien craft and read US government briefing documents that described alien involvement in human affairs over the past 10,000 years.

I disregard testimony like that unless it comes with substantiating evidence.  Lazar's testimony doesn't have that.

 

It also doesn't have anything to do with the military using UFO "threats" to increase its budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, giddyup said:

Read the section on the pyramids. Still doesn't explain how great works of art were created using primitive tools.

What great works of art do you think required alien technology and why?

 

Amazing things were done in the past using lots of manpower, lots of time, and basic tools. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, VocalNeal said:

...and lots and lots of time. Something oft forgotten.

 

I smile at the "What if we built it today" TV programs. Their projects are not planned on a 25 year schedule 

What people fail to consider when it comes to ancient achievements is that humans have not significantly evolved in the fast few thousand of years. Perhaps in size, but that can also be attributed to  better nutrition and health care, 

So Humans back then  were equally as intelligent as now, if not more since they did not have to depend on technologies such as calculators, computers etc. And the incidence of genius occured at the same at the same frequency. And as I said they had lots and lots of slaves. Even though steam engines were invented more well over 2,000 ago they did not develop into practical applications until later. 

Why?

Because the nessacery investment was not economically feasible since they had slaves who could do the work much cheaper.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, giddyup said:

Read the section on the pyramids. Still doesn't explain how great works of art were created using primitive tools.

The item in your post  does not look to me like a pyramid, but hey! I could be wrong. 

Does it look to you like a pyramid?

Edited by sirineou
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, heybruce said:

What great works of art do you think required alien technology and why?

 

Amazing things were done in the past using lots of manpower, lots of time, and basic tools. 

The 100 ton granite stone boxes at the Serapeum are a good example. These were supposed to have been made using pounding stones and copper chisels. The degree of accuracy achieved would be just impossible using those tools, but there's many, many other examples.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, heybruce said:

I disregard testimony like that unless it comes with substantiating evidence.  Lazar's testimony doesn't have that.

 

It also doesn't have anything to do with the military using UFO "threats" to increase its budget.

The title of thread has zero to do with budgets. I'm more of the it's an excuse for testing drones and other top secret flying machines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, EVENKEEL said:

The title of thread has zero to do with budgets. I'm more of the it's an excuse for testing drones and other top secret flying machines.

So we can agree that the military has not tried to justify their budget based on the existence (and implied threat) of UFO's?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, sirineou said:

The item in your post  does not look to me like a pyramid, but hey! I could be wrong. 

Does it look to you like a pyramid?

How many working slaves can you fit on the stone box using primitive tools? Slaves may have been useful for moving large objects, but the mind boggles as to how many were needed to move a 2000 ton block of stone.

Edited by giddyup
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, VocalNeal said:

^ Yes. Exactly. We would do some calculations and decide one crane can't do it so we would add another crane. They just kept adding slaves until it moved.

Not just moved, lifted metres into the air and placed with precision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, giddyup said:

How many slaves can you fit on the stone box using primitive tools?

Not many but you can keep them there for a long time.

 

5 minutes ago, giddyup said:

but the mind boggles as to how many were needed to move a 2000 ton block of stone

Taking it easy with the slaves and not wanting to get in trouble OSHA , if each slave could lift 20 Lbs ... 200 slaves, add to that  a few helium balloons  and....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, giddyup said:

Not just moved, lifted metres into the air and placed with precision.

I'm sure when man gets to Mars and they meet any Martians the first question they will ask is. Do you have any large stones you need lifting????

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

The title of thread has zero to do with budgets. I'm more of the it's an excuse for testing drones and other top secret flying machines.

This tangent began with the following series of posts and replies:

 

4 hours ago, hotchilli said:

Absolutely yes... if the military can claim that UAP's are an existential threat from possible action, the military can further justify a budget to increase their weaponisation, and protection of American soil.

That's how it works.

 

3 hours ago, heybruce said:

The military has more than enough real existential threats to use to justify its budget.  It doesn't need fantasy ones.

 

3 hours ago, hotchilli said:

You really need to investigate the secret works that Boeing, Northrop Grummond and many others are doing.

 

1 hour ago, heybruce said:

You really need to tell us, with supporting sources, what your investigations of these secret works have revealed.

 

BTW:  I'm retired USAF.  I was once in on many secrets.  All of them addressed real threats, not fantasies.

I don't know if the military ever took advantage of UFO/UAP stories to cover up secret weapons tests and embarrassing failures, but I wouldn't be surprised if it happened.

Edited by heybruce
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, giddyup said:

The 100 ton granite stone boxes at the Serapeum are a good example. These were supposed to have been made using pounding stones and copper chisels. The degree of accuracy achieved would be just impossible using those tools, but there's many, many other examples.

Why would the accuracy have been impossible?  It would have been difficult and time consuming, but in between planting and harvesting agrarian societies had lots of surplus labor accustomed to doing hard physical labor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, giddyup said:

Not just moved, lifted metres into the air and placed with precision.

How much would you give me if I raised , with no help from anyone else, a 100 tone stone like the one you posted  to a Hight of two meters with primitive tools (29 ft long  bar)   ?

If I can't I will give you 5 million baht. or any amount you want. I am that confident I can do it. 

Remember, just because you don't know something. it's not unknowable. I am sure there are plenty of thing that you know and I don't. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, heybruce said:

Why would the accuracy have been impossible?  It would have been difficult and time consuming, but in between planting and harvesting agrarian societies had lots of surplus labor accustomed to doing hard physical labor.

Accuracy within thousandths of an inch?  Do you have any idea how quickly a copper chisel get blunt when cutting granite? Stonemasons have tried, and failed to duplicate the ancient methods. Hey, if you believe this was all possible using those tools, be my guest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sirineou said:

How much would you give me if I raised , with no help from anyone else, a 100 tone stone like the one you posted  to a Hight of two meters with primitive tools (29 ft long  bar)   ?

If I can't I will give you 5 million baht. or any amount you want. I am that confident I can do it. 

Remember, just because you don't know something. it's not unknowable. I am sure there are plenty of thing that you know and I don't. 

 

What about 2000 tons? You're going to need a pretty long lever.

Edited by giddyup
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, giddyup said:

What about 2000 tons?

You said the item you posted was 100 tons 

"There is no way the Egyptians created some of their masterpieces like the 100 ton granite stone "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, giddyup said:

Accuracy within thousandths of an inch?  Do you have any idea how quickly a copper chisel get blunt when cutting granite? Stonemasons have tried, and failed to duplicate the ancient methods. Hey, if you believe this was all possible using those tools, be my guest.

So don't use a chisel.  Use rough sand and hand held wooden blocks to polish the rough faces smooth.

 

BTW:  Builders in medieval Europe lifted heavy blocks very high in the air when constructing Cathedrals.  They used cranes made of wood, rope and pulleys.  The tools weren't that different from those used a thousand years earlier.

Edited by heybruce
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sirineou said:

You said the item you posted was 100 tons 

"There is no way the Egyptians created some of their masterpieces like the 100 ton granite stone "

I wasn't talking about moving it but hollowing it out with the same degree of accuracy and polishing it to a mirror shine. If you've never seen these objects you have no idea of the workmanship involved. They couldn't be made today with our advanced technology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, heybruce said:

So don't use a chisel.  Use rough sand and hand held wooden blocks to polish the rough faces smooth.

How do you hollow out a 100 ton granite box using sand and a wooden block? Sorry, futile to discuss with people who have no concept of what's involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...