Deepfake Biden Robocall in New Hampshire Highlights Growing Concerns Over Election Disruption

[Social Media]

 

A recent incident involving a deepfake robocall mimicking President Joe Biden's voice has raised concerns about the potential for election disruption using artificial intelligence (AI). The call urged voters in New Hampshire not to participate in the primary and save their votes for the general election in November. The incident underscores the growing danger posed by deepfake technology in spreading misinformation and interfering with the democratic process.

 

Key Points:

 

Deepfake Robocall Details:

• The deepfake robocall featured President Biden's voice, delivering a message discouraging New Hampshire voters from participating in the primary.
• The call, which originated from the phone number of a former New Hampshire Democratic Party chair, aimed to disrupt a potential write-in campaign for Biden in the primary.

 

Disruption of Write-In Campaign:

• The deepfake message suggested that voting in the primary would benefit Republicans and enable the re-election of Donald Trump.
• The intent was to dissuade voters from participating in the primary, potentially affecting the outcome of the write-in campaign for President Biden.

 

Investigation and Legal Response:

• The New Hampshire Attorney General's office announced an investigation into the deepfake robocall, considering it an "unlawful attempt to disrupt the New Hampshire Presidential Primary Election."
• The AG's office emphasized that voters should disregard the content of the message, labeling it as an attack on democracy.

 

Concerns Over AI-Generated Misinformation:

• The incident highlights the broader concern of AI-generated misinformation impacting elections and political discourse.
• Deepfake technology allows for the creation of convincing audio and video content, raising the potential for misleading voters and spreading false narratives.

 

Regulatory Challenges and Slow Response:

• Policymakers and regulators face challenges in addressing the misuse of AI in the political sphere.
• The incident follows OpenAI's ban on a user who created a bot mimicking a Democratic presidential candidate, demonstrating the broader impact of AI in political communication.

 

Potential Supreme Court Challenge:

• The denial of Trump's request for a rehearing on a gag order-related appeal paves the way for a potential Supreme Court challenge, indicating the legal complexities surrounding AI-related issues.

 

Need for Candidate Vigilance and Education:

• Experts emphasize the importance of candidates being proactive in addressing AI-related threats and educating voters about potential misinformation.
• Candidates are urged to embrace AI responsibly for campaign messaging and engage with voters to counteract misinformation.

 

Balancing AI Benefits and Risks:

• While AI presents opportunities for automating campaign tasks and improving communication, its misuse poses significant risks.
• The challenge is to strike a balance between leveraging AI for positive purposes and safeguarding against malicious uses that undermine the democratic process.

 

Conclusion:

The deepfake Biden robocall incident in New Hampshire underscores the urgent need for policymakers, candidates, and the public to grapple with the evolving landscape of AI-driven misinformation in elections. As the 2024 elections approach, vigilance, education, and responsible use of AI are crucial in mitigating the risks and ensuring the integrity of the democratic process.

 

24.01.24

Source

 

[JonnyF]

The call was obviously fake.

 

The voice from the robocall was far too coherent to have come from Biden. No slurring. No made up words. A very poor impersonation. AI has a long way to go...

[impulse]

It'll be interesting to see if it was a Repub caller, or a Dem caller trying to get more people to vote for Haley.

 

We'll know, if they catch them.  If they do, it'll be a Repub.  If they never catch them, it was a Dem.

 

[JonnyF]

1 hour ago, impulse said:

It'll be interesting to see if it was a Repub caller, or a Dem caller trying to get more people to vote for Haley.

 

We'll know, if they catch them.  If they do, it'll be a Repub.  If they never catch them, it was a Dem.

 

 

I'm guessing Trump will be indicted for this next week. 

 

He's been indicted for pretty much everything else after all.

 

They could even claim it's insurrection. Threatening Democracy. Maybe even an attempted coup. I mean he's polling pretty well.

 

Assuming the Dem DA isn't too busy banging the married help she hired of course. 

[placeholder]

44 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

I'm guessing Trump will be indicted for this next week. 

 

He's been indicted for pretty much everything else after all.

 

They could even claim it's insurrection. Threatening Democracy. Maybe even an attempted coup. I mean he's polling pretty well.

 

Assuming the Dem DA isn't too busy banging the married help she hired of course. 

You have a peculiar command of American geography. Willis is located in Georgia. The alleged fraud took place in New Hampshire. Just to make this perfectly clear to you, Georgia and New Hampshire are separate states. So Willis wouldn't have jurisdiction in New Hampshire.

[JonnyF]

30 minutes ago, placeholder said:

You have a peculiar command of American geography. Willis is located in Georgia. The alleged fraud took place in New Hampshire. Just to make this perfectly clear to you, Georgia and New Hampshire are separate states. So Willis wouldn't have jurisdiction in New Hampshire.

 

Apparently she gets around.

[Chomper Higgot]

31 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Apparently she gets around.

But, filling in your customary ignorance on all things America, her jurisdiction doesn’t.

 

 

[placeholder]

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

Apparently she gets around.

The thing is, it's apparent only to you.