placeholder Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 31 minutes ago, susanlea said: Social scientist, not a climate scientist. He was unemployed when he started the misinformation website. He was caught out misrepresenting reports and nobody respects him. Basically a fraudster. And as for nobody respecting him, did you read the curriculum vitae I posted. That's your idea of nobody? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
susanlea Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 Just now, placeholder said: And as for nobody respecting him, did you read the curriculum vitae I posted. That's your idea of nobody? A dishonest climate shonky alarmist. That's your man? Explains a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placeholder Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 7 minutes ago, susanlea said: Nothing post. I quote an article from Nature, possibly the most prestigious scientific journal in the world, that contradicts your claim, and you call it a nothing post. It's you who've got nothing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
susanlea Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 Just now, placeholder said: I quote an article from Nature, possibly the most prestigious scientific journal in the world, that contradicts your claim, and you call it a nothing post. It's you who've got nothing. Nothing post. Nothing new there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
susanlea Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 14 minutes ago, placeholder said: James Taylor wrote an article in Forbes claiming that 2015 was not the hottest year on record:49a7 Are you going to correct this claim? It is embarrassing how you got it wrong despite the graph on this topic showing him to be correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placeholder Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 7 minutes ago, susanlea said: 1998 was the hottest year until 2016 so it held the record for 18 years. I can't believe you are basing your assertions on the graph of Dr. Roy Spencer who can't get his work published in respectable journals and accuses the scientific world of conspiracy. This is definitely not a graph that the climatological research community bases its work on. On the other hand, the graph below reflects the consensus of the climatological community. I have taken the liberty of highlighting the year of 1998 in the graph below the first one just to make clear how tendentious your claim is. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-24021772 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placeholder Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 13 minutes ago, susanlea said: Are you going to correct this claim? It is embarrassing how you got it wrong despite the graph on this topic showing him to be correct. If anyone should be embarrassed it's you basing your case on the widely dismissed work of Dr. Roy Spencer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placeholder Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 16 minutes ago, susanlea said: Nothing post. Nothing new there. It may not be new, but in fact it certainly doesn't support your claims about the steady increase in temperature rise. And instead of offering valid evidence to contradict it, all you offer is empty words. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 10 hours ago, susanlea said: Nothing post. It is common for people to ignore data outside their paradigm. It's called "cognitive dissonance". You manifest that behavior when you fail to respond to scientific papers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 10 hours ago, susanlea said: Nothing post. Nothing new there. Your world view is based on the premise that scientists are wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placeholder Posted May 7 Share Posted May 7 1 minute ago, Danderman123 said: It is common for people to ignore data outside their paradigm. It's called "cognitive dissonance". You manifest that behavior when you fail to respond to scientific papers. Actually, they didn't fail to respond. Rather they dismissed research from one of the most prestigious, maybe the most prestigious, scientific journal in the world. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 April 2024 was hottest on record, marking 11 months of new highs The common thread among Climate Change Deniers is that reality always proves them wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now