Childless people are now under political attack by authoritarian forces in both Russia and the USA and most likely other countries as well.

 

So this has me wondering. 

 

Are childless people a natural next step for inclusion under LGBTQ?

 

Most likely you heard it here first.

 

Russia's controversial move: Tackling child-free ideology with new laws (msn.com)

Russia's controversial move: Tackling child-free ideology with new laws

 

How JD Vance’s Attacks On ‘Childless Cat Ladies’ Reflect His Policy Views (msn.com)

How JD Vance’s Attacks On ‘Childless Cat Ladies’ Reflect His Policy Views

No, I would rather keep LGB and get rid of the rest of the alphabet soup.

19 hours ago, orchis said:

No, I would rather keep LGB and get rid of the rest of the alphabet soup.

I'm sure many others can sympathize with the sentiment that things should have been kept SIMPLE as you suggest. However there really isn't any chance of getting such reversal at this point. With that in mind, I think watching what the "traditionalists" in the USA, Russia, etc. continue to do around the issue of politically demonizing childless people makes sense and that if it gets much worse, they might eventually seem a natural inclusion.