Harris Surges Past Trump In Election Betting Markets After First Presidential Debate

[Inderpland]

29 minutes ago, DougieMax said:

I don't necessarily agree, but you are at least reasonable sounding in your reply.

 

After the fairly conducted debate on CNN, it was not unreasonable to expect something similar from ABC. On that point, he was sadly mistaken; once a whore, always a whore. You can be sure that it will not happen again. Trump generally knows how to learn from his mistakes which, one would think, would be an attractive quality for the position.

 

Harris was indeed well prepared which I am convinced also involved the use of an earphone for outside instructions. As you observed, she stated nothing of substance regarding policy and made a number of patently false statements that went unchallenged. The facial exprtessions were distracting too along with the whiny quality of her voice which is not the stuff of leadership.

 

Thank you for being civil.

Not sure, but I think referring to Trump as "a whore" might be testing the Forum rules. Not that I disagree though!

[DougieMax]

14 minutes ago, WorriedNoodle said:

This seems clearly deluded to me. There was no difference of the line of questioning on CNN or ABC. Trump won the CNN debate because Biden was out of it. Trump lost the ABC debate because of his nonsense and lack of composure far surpassed what any rational person might expect. He only has Fox or some extremist right channels left to try his luck on next debate based on your theory but they are such a niche market for those networks it won't ever happen. Time to get back on the campaign trail.

I have to disagree again. The Haitains eating pets topic was outright denied by the agressive moderator despite his being wrong. Also, the 2025 issue and "fine people" hoaxes made by Harris got a quiet pass along with several others. I wish Trump had had the presence of mind to simply address the moderator with the question: Am I debating you or Harris? And any flack or failure to remedy the approach should have been met with him simply walking off the stage. Harris will never accept a non-biased venue. Nor will she consent to a search for earphone or similar devices. 

[Lacessit]

54 minutes ago, DougieMax said:

3 against 1 argument would be a very big deal for you if the positions were reversed.

Trump lied 33 times during the debate. He got fact checked 5 times. IMO he got off lightly.

 

I suggest you lay in a few boxes of Kleenex for November 5.

[RSD1]

4 minutes ago, DougieMax said:

I have to disagree again. The Haitains eating pets topic was outright denied by the agressive moderator despite his being wrong. Also, the 2025 issue and "fine people" hoaxes made by Harris got a quiet pass along with several others. I wish Trump had had the presence of mind to simply address the moderator with the question: Am I debating you or Harris? And any flack or failure to remedy the approach should have been met with him simply walking off the stage. Harris will never accept a non-biased venue. Nor will she consent to a search for earphone or similar devices. 

This is all whataboutism. Harris didn't need that debate, Trump did. Now Trump wants another one. You can make up all the excuses you want about why he lost the debate, but it doesn't matter. Lost is lost. And he will be lucky to get another one. Any time he doesn't like the terms of the debate or the options he can simply walk away as you suggested, but he didn't and he won't. He's too desperate. 

[Inderpland]

6 minutes ago, DougieMax said:

I have to disagree again. The Haitains eating pets topic was outright denied by the agressive moderator despite his being wrong. Also, the 2025 issue and "fine people" hoaxes made by Harris got a quiet pass along with several others. I wish Trump had had the presence of mind to simply address the moderator with the question: Am I debating you or Harris? And any flack or failure to remedy the approach should have been met with him simply walking off the stage. Harris will never accept a non-biased venue. Nor will she consent to a search for earphone or similar devices. 

What fine people hoax?? He said it, officially and on the record.

https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/apr/26/context-trumps-very-fine-people-both-sides-remarks/

 

And attacking the mods would have made it even worse for him. It would have made him appear even more sullen, unprepared and useless. Like a kid throwing a tantrum when caught stealing from the cookie jar.

But I understand why you MAGA faithful do everything you can to distract the attention away from what was a complete "train wreck*" of a performance.

* Karl Rove's words
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-harris-debate-karl-rove-verdict-b2611340.html

[Will B Good]

16 minutes ago, DougieMax said:

I have to disagree again. The Haitains eating pets topic was outright denied by the agressive moderator despite his being wrong. Also, the 2025 issue and "fine people" hoaxes made by Harris got a quiet pass along with several others. I wish Trump had had the presence of mind to simply address the moderator with the question: Am I debating you or Harris? And any flack or failure to remedy the approach should have been met with him simply walking off the stage. Harris will never accept a non-biased venue. Nor will she consent to a search for earphone or similar devices. 

 

So it is true?

 

Can you provide a credible link please?

[StandardIssue]

6 hours ago, maesariang said:

A woman with no idea and 3.5 years of doing nothing.

Thanks for the articulate, insightful and very descriptive retort. LOL. 

 

As I said, anyone with a good grasp of the English language and is well educated could discern just who is by far and wide the most qualified candidate - Harris

Edited Thursday at 09:55 AM by StandardIssue

[Will B Good]

19 minutes ago, DougieMax said:

I have to disagree again. The Haitains eating pets topic was outright denied by the agressive moderator despite his being wrong. Also, the 2025 issue and "fine people" hoaxes made by Harris got a quiet pass along with several others. I wish Trump had had the presence of mind to simply address the moderator with the question: Am I debating you or Harris? And any flack or failure to remedy the approach should have been met with him simply walking off the stage. Harris will never accept a non-biased venue. Nor will she consent to a search for earphone or similar devices. 

 

 

There is no credible evidence or verified reports that Kamala Harris refused to be checked for wearing an “invisible” earpiece during any debate with Donald Trump. This claim seems to be part of misinformation or conspiracy theories that often arise around high-profile political events.

 

Similar rumors have circulated about various political figures, particularly during televised debates, but they are usually unsubstantiated and debunked by fact-checkers. During debates, candidates typically follow strict rules set by the debate commission, and the use of any earpieces or communication devices would likely be prohibited.

 

Can you please provide a credible link for KH refusing to be checked for an earphone?

[maesariang]

3 minutes ago, StandardIssue said:

Thanks for the articulate, insightful and very descriptive retort. LOL!! Just the kind of individual that Trump panders to. As I said, anyone with a good grasp on the English language and is well educated could discern just who is by far and wide the most qualified candidate - Harris

Good at doing nothing and dodging questions.

Edited Thursday at 09:54 AM by maesariang

[Lacessit]

7 hours ago, maesariang said:

So the bribes are coming in. Telling. Bought and owned.

I did not see you posting objections when the Trump camp paid Drake Enterprises to stage a fake auto workers meeting.

[StandardIssue]

2 minutes ago, maesariang said:

Good at doing nothing and dodging questions.

Your words are so compelling LOL!

[DougieMax]

9 hours ago, mfd101 said:

So far - over 2 months & including The Debate - it appears that the more people see of her, the more they like her. Funny that.

And you know this, how? Polls?

[maesariang]

1 minute ago, StandardIssue said:

Your words are so compelling LOL!

No achievements in 3.5 years 

[marin]

Just now, DougieMax said:

And you know this, how? Polls?

The same way we know the sun comes up in the east and sets in the west...

[maesariang]

2 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I did not see you posting objections when the Trump camp paid Drake Enterprises to stage a fake auto workers meeting.

Deflection

 

[Lacessit]

1 minute ago, DougieMax said:

And you know this, how? Polls?

Crowd sizes at rallies. Please keep up.

[Lacessit]

1 minute ago, maesariang said:

Deflection

 

Pot. Kettle. Black.

[spidermike007]

At moments it felt as if Harris was saying to Trump could you please prove to us that you're insane, there are still some people that do not doubt your sanity. I need you to act up and say some things to offer solid proof. 

 

And it was as if Trump said, okay I can do that, no problem, here I go. What can one say?

 

Harris and the Dems could not have asked for a better result. Let's see what she can do with it now, let's see if the next few weeks show significant improvement in the polling. 

 

 

[Lacessit]

1 hour ago, DougieMax said:

. Trump generally knows how to learn from his mistakes which, one would think, would be an attractive quality for the position.

 

 

Do you think Trump will start reading his daily briefings if he is re-elected?

 

Haven't you heard? Trump converted a $5 million defamation award into $83 million?

 

Who called fallen soldiers suckers and losers, then didn't want to be seen with disabled veterans?

 

Will Trump stop saying he won, when he loses?

 

Trump learns from his mistakes? What are you smoking?

 

 

[Paradise Pete]

On 9/11/2024 at 4:36 AM, maesariang said:

Trump was $4 in 2016.

 

in 2016 blue voters were not motivated. The biggest difference between then and now is that they realize that Trump is in the running for Worst Human on the Planet and a genuine danger to the country.

 

They are highly motivated now.

[maesariang]

2 minutes ago, Paradise Pete said:

 

in 2016 blue voters were not motivated. The biggest difference between then and now is that they realize that Trump is in the running for Worst Human on the Planet and a genuine danger to the country.

 

They are highly motivated now.

Best president in decades. How dumb can voters be? 

[bubblegum]

59 minutes ago, DougieMax said:

I have to disagree again. The Haitains eating pets topic was outright denied by the agressive moderator despite his being wrong. Also, the 2025 issue and "fine people" hoaxes made by Harris got a quiet pass along with several others. I wish Trump had had the presence of mind to simply address the moderator with the question: Am I debating you or Harris? And any flack or failure to remedy the approach should have been met with him simply walking off the stage. Harris will never accept a non-biased venue. Nor will she consent to a search for earphone or similar devices. 

Lets say you're correct. Will Trump be willing to do a drugs test? Adderol? Ask him pls. you seem to know him by the language you use. Please explain to me why we have to be civil towards you and your buddy Trump when you call Harris a whore? You know what she might have a vibrating device stuffed up her p***** alerting her to wake up cause it's her turn. Or even better, the debate did not happen at all, it was just fake IA for the first time on live television. A breakthrough invention by Soros. Or...or...or...or.

[Lacessit]

34 minutes ago, maesariang said:

No achievements in 3.5 years 

VP's are not supposed to achieve anything. As John Nance Garner said, the job is not worth a bucket of warm p!ss.

 

IMO Mike Pence broke the mould by ratifying Biden's election, as he was bound to do by the Constitution.

 

Your slip is showing, susan. The laugh tag is a dead giveaway.

[Inderpland]

'Trump allies do damage control as Harris rides fresh momentum post debate'

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/12/politics/trump-harris-debate-fallout-analysis/index.html

[bubblegum]

7 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Your slip is showing, susan.

OMG how I wish I came up with this 1.

[Cory1848]

1 hour ago, DougieMax said:

I have to disagree again. The Haitains eating pets topic was outright denied by the agressive moderator despite his being wrong. Also, the 2025 issue and "fine people" hoaxes made by Harris got a quiet pass along with several others. I wish Trump had had the presence of mind to simply address the moderator with the question: Am I debating you or Harris? And any flack or failure to remedy the approach should have been met with him simply walking off the stage. Harris will never accept a non-biased venue. Nor will she consent to a search for earphone or similar devices. 

What on earth are you talking about. The Haitians eating cats story is a laughable falsehood (Trump said he “heard it on TV”). Trump is up to his neck in Project 2025; much of what he says he wants to do is contained in the report, and it’s drafted by people he would likely pick as his advisers. And he called Nazis “fine people”; it’s on video and has been replayed ad nauseam (he also dines with Nazis at Mar-a-Lago). You’re in dire need of a reality check.

 

If Trump is sobbing about a couple of “aggressive” debate moderators hurting his feelings, Putin, as Harris pointed out, will eat him for lunch.

[maesariang]

Just now, Cory1848 said:

What on earth are you talking about. The Haitians eating cats story is a laughable falsehood (Trump said he “heard it on TV”). Trump is up to his neck in Project 2025; much of what he says he wants to do is contained in the report, and it’s drafted by people he would likely pick as his advisers. And he called Nazis “fine people”; it’s on video and has been replayed ad nauseam (he also dines with Nazis at Mar-a-Lago). You’re in dire need of a reality check.

 

If Trump is sobbing about a couple of “aggressive” debate moderators hurting his feelings, Putin, as Harris pointed out, will eat him for lunch.

The nazis died 80 years ago or fled to Argentina. 

[maesariang]

1 minute ago, Cory1848 said:

Trump is sobbing about a couple of “aggressive” debate moderators hurting his feelings, Putin, as Harris pointed out, will eat him for lunch.

So that's why Putin invaded Ukraine under Biden. Derr 

[maesariang]

3 minutes ago, Cory1848 said:

Trump is up to his neck in Project 2025;

Lie. Nothing to do with him.

 

Why does the left keep lying? Sad.

[maesariang]

How is Harris going to stop the war? Putin has laughed at her for 2.5  years now

 

Harris acting all tough in a debate with scripted answers. If she going to use a script on Putin? Pull a few faces and laugh. She is a joke.

Edited Thursday at 11:32 AM by maesariang