Jump to content

How will this bill demand Sanctuary Cities cooperate with the ruling if passed?


riclag

Recommended Posts


4 minutes ago, riclag said:

The Be Gone Act.
 

15,000 illegal migrants convicted of sex assault are roaming US — and a new bill would force ICE to hunt them down and deport them!

https://nypost.com/2024/10/01/us-news/be-gone-act-would-force-deportation-of-migrant-sex-offenders/

 

 

Meanwhile, ICE says a major hindrance to its efforts to detain illegal migrants convicted of crimes has been sanctuary laws preventing local jurisdictions from communicating with the agency’s officers.

I hope the dogooders, for lack of better  words, allow ICE to do their jobs to protect The American Citizens , if” dems pass this  along and is enacted as law! 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, riclag said:

15,000 illegal migrants convicted of sex assault are roaming US — and a new bill would force ICE to hunt them down and deport them!

 

Why don't you try not continuing to repeat the same already debunked nonsense claims involving stats that don't represent what you and others have wrongly claimed them to represent:

 

Fact check: To attack Harris, Trump falsely describes new stats on immigrants and homicide

September 29, 2024

 

"Washington (CNN)  — Former President Donald Trump is wildly distorting new statistics on immigration and crime to attack Vice President Kamala Harris.

 

Trump falsely claimed Friday and Saturday that the statistics are specifically about criminal offenders who entered the US during the Biden-Harris administration; in reality, the figures are about offenders who entered the US over multiple decades, including during the Trump administration. And Trump falsely claimed that the statistics are specifically about people who are now living freely in the US; the figures actually include people who are currently in jails and prisons serving criminal sentences." [emphasis added]

...

The statistics have been deployed by Trump and various Republican lawmakers and right-wing commentators as alarming evidence of Harris’ supposed mismanagement of immigration policy. But in addition to exaggerating her role on the file — she was never actually “border czar” — much of the chatter has inaccurately described what the statistics show.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/29/politics/fact-check-trump-harris-immigrants-homicide/index.html

 

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

Why don't you try not continuing to repeat the same already debunked nonsense claims:

 

Fact check: To attack Harris, Trump falsely describes new stats on immigrants and homicide

September 29, 2024

 

"Washington (CNN)  — Former President Donald Trump is wildly distorting new statistics on immigration and crime to attack Vice President Kamala Harris.

 

Trump falsely claimed Friday and Saturday that the statistics are specifically about criminal offenders who entered the US during the Biden-Harris administration; in reality, the figures are about offenders who entered the US over multiple decades, including during the Trump administration. And Trump falsely claimed that the statistics are specifically about people who are now living freely in the US; the figures actually include people who are currently in jails and prisons serving criminal sentences." [emphasis added]

...

The statistics have been deployed by Trump and various Republican lawmakers and right-wing commentators as alarming evidence of Harris’ supposed mismanagement of immigration policy. But in addition to exaggerating her role on the file — she was never actually “border czar” — much of the chatter has inaccurately described what the statistics show.

 

https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/29/politics/fact-check-trump-harris-immigrants-homicide/index.html

 

 

That's a MAGA pattern. Repeat debunked claims in the hope they will become true! 😀

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And more of the same documenting that the above cited figures are nonsense. Just because the cited people are not in ICE custody doesn't mean they at large in society, since the ICE list counts people who in fact are held in custody elsewhere -- making the Trump and Co.'s claims about the statistics bogus.

Trump, Vance Wrong About ‘Illegal Immigrant Murderers’

September 30, 2024

...

In its statement, the Department of Homeland Security said data in Lechleitner’s letter had been “misinterpreted.”

 

“The data goes back decades; it includes individuals who entered the country over the past 40 years or more, the vast majority of whose custody determination was made long before this Administration,” the statement said. “It also includes many who are under the jurisdiction or currently incarcerated by federal, state or local law enforcement partners.”

...

Similarly, Michelle Mittelstadt, director of communications for the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute, told us that people have been on the non-detained docket “for decades.”

“There is a lot of confusion around the non-detained docket,” including “who is on it and how long they’ve been on it,” Mittelstadt said in an email. “This docket has grown under multiple administrations, including the Trump one. Significant numbers of people on the docket have been on it for decades.”

 

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/09/trump-vance-wrong-about-illegal-immigrant-murderers/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for so-called sanctuary cities and their supposed correlation with crime rates:

 

"In an August 2016 study of roughly 80 jurisdictions, University of California at Riverside and Highline College researchers used FBI city-level crime data to see how violent and property crime rates changed after sanctuary policies were adopted. Then they compared each sanctuary city to a similarly situated, non-sanctuary city, based on census data and other variables. They found that “a sanctuary policy itself has no statistically meaningful effect on crime.” [emphasis added]

 

University of California at San Diego professor Tom Wong looked at 608 sanctuary counties and found lower rates of crime in those counties than in non-sanctuary counties. His research was published in January by the progressive think tank Center for American Progress. [emphasis added]

 

Other studies showed that in some jurisdictions, immigrant-friendly policies led to a decrease in crime, PolitiFact found.

 

Washington Post

https://archive.ph/McbRw

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/02/08/trumps-claim-that-sanctuary-cities-breed-crime/

 

 

"Researchers from the study Sessions cited found that sanctuary policies do not affect crime rates either way. The study analyzed crime data from jurisdictions that "expressly forbid city officials or police departments from inquiring into immigration status" and analyzed it in two methods. [emphasis added]

 

First, researchers compared cities’ crime rate in the year before and the year after a policy’s implementation. In the second approach, they "matched each sanctuary city to a similarly situated non-sanctuary city based on relevant census and political variables," the authors explained in an October 2016 post in the Washington Post’s Monkey Cage blog.

 

At the end, "We find no statistically discernible difference in violent crime rate, rape, or property crime across the cities. Our findings provide evidence that sanctuary policies have no effect on crime rates, despite narratives to the contrary," said the 2016 study, titled "The Politics of Refuge: Sanctuary Cities, Crime, and Undocumented Immigration." The researchers were from the University of California at Riverside and Highline College. [emphasis added]

 

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/jul/24/jeff-sessions/jeff-sessions-mischaracterizes-study-sanctuary-cit/

 

 

 

"...a January 2017 report that considered more than 600 counties to be sanctuary locales.

 

The report by the Washington-based Center for American Progress, a liberal public policy research and advocacy group, "The Effects of Sanctuary Policies on Crime and the Economy," states that crime in 2015 was significantly lower in 608 "sanctuary" counties than in counties where law officers were more compliant with requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials to detain locally-held suspects. [emphasis added]

 

Tom K. Wong, a political scientist at the University of California, San Diego, wrote: "There are, on average, 35.5 fewer crimes committed per 10,000 people in sanctuary counties compared to non-sanctuary counties. Altogether, the data suggest that when local law enforcement focuses on keeping communities safe, rather than becoming entangled in federal immigration enforcement efforts, communities are safer," the report says, plus there are other advantages such as stronger economies."

 

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/may/10/sally-hernandez/sally-hernandez-says-cities-labeled-sanctuaries-ha/

 

 

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...