Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Chantra_Hall.jpg

 

Anutin Charnvirakul, leader of the Bhumjaithai Party, rejected accusations yesterday, October 1, that his party swayed the Senate's vote to retain the double majority requirement for constitutional referendums.

 

“We had nothing to do with it,” Anutin stated, addressing Senator Nantana Nantavaropas' remarks suggesting possible manipulation in the vote.

 

Anutin, who also serves as Deputy Prime Minister and Interior Minister, stressed that any push for a new constitution must go through coalition leaders first. Chousak Sirinil, PM’s Office Minister, added that a joint committee is expected to iron out the differences between the Lower and Upper Houses regarding the majority needed for the referendum.

 


 

 

 

Chousak mentioned that Pheu Thai must consult with coalition heads to advance the new constitution. Some coalition parties suggest amending Section 256 to establish a drafting body for the new charter. If Parliament approves a new constitution this way, it could be immediately put to a referendum.

 

Wisut Chainarun, a Pheu Thai list-MP and chief government whip, will organise a meeting of coalition leaders to discuss the matter. Chousak is confident that the new constitution can be drafted within the government’s remaining term and proposed forming a panel for the charter-rewrite.

 

On Monday, the Upper House voted 164-21, with nine abstentions, to keep the double majority rule, which requires over 50% voter turnout and majority approval in referendums. The composition of the new Senate, viewed as having ties to Bhumjaithai, raises suspicions, with 14 senators from Buriram and several others from well-represented provinces in the Lower House. In total, the Bhumjaithai-aligned blue bloc comprises at least 150 of 200 senators.

 

File photo for reference only

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

-- 2024-10-02


news-footer-2.png

 

image.png

  • Haha 1
Posted
13 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

Chousak Sirinil, PM’s Office Minister, added that a joint committee is expected to iron out the differences between the Lower and Upper Houses regarding the majority needed for the referendum.

And we all know how that goes....

Posted

Putting aside the particulars of Thailand's recent history, the rule - in ANY country - that you need 50%+ turnout of voters and 50%+ approval votes seems perfectly sensible.

 

You don't change a constitution on a whim.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...