Menendez Brothers’ Convictions to be Revisited Amid New Evidence & Interest

[Social Media]

 

More than three decades after Erik and Lyle Menendez were convicted for the brutal 1989 murders of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills home, their case is set to be reviewed. The brothers, who were sentenced to life without parole, had long maintained that they acted in self-defense, citing years of sexual abuse by their father. Now, the Los Angeles County district attorney, George Gascon, has announced that there is a "moral and ethical obligation" to examine new evidence presented by the brothers.

 

 

The Menendez case, which became a media spectacle in the 1990s, has garnered renewed public attention following the release of a Netflix series, *Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story*. The show has brought the sensational case back into the spotlight, reviving debate over the brothers' motives and the fairness of their original trial. The brothers were accused of killing their parents in a plot to inherit their father’s fortune, a narrative that was central to the prosecution’s argument during the trial.

 

In 1989, the Menendez brothers shot their parents in their Beverly Hills mansion, and prosecutors argued that greed was their driving force. Following the murders, Lyle and Erik reportedly spent a large portion of their inheritance on luxury goods, including Rolex watches, cars, and high-end real estate, well before they were even considered suspects. This alleged spree of lavish spending contributed to the trial's notoriety, which was broadcast on national television and captivated audiences across the U.S.

 

The brothers initially presented allegations of long-term sexual abuse by their father during the first trial. However, this trial ended in a hung jury. At the second trial, much of the abuse claims were dismissed, and the brothers were subsequently found guilty in 1996. Lyle Menendez was 21 and Erik Menendez was 18 when they committed the murders.

 

The newly submitted evidence now under review includes a letter written by Erik Menendez to his cousin in 1988, a year before the murders, which reportedly alludes to his father's abuse. Although this evidence is being evaluated, Gascon stressed that "none of this information has been confirmed." He went on to say, "We are not, at this point, ready to say that we either believe or do not believe that information. But we're here to tell you that we have a moral and an ethical obligation to review what is being presented to us."

 

Gascon added that his team was not implying that anything went wrong with the original trial but acknowledged that the new evidence could lead to potential resentencing or even a retrial. A hearing has been scheduled for November 26, as reported by CBS News, the BBC's U.S. partner.

 

Public interest in the Menendez brothers’ case has surged in part due to the controversial portrayal of the events in the Netflix drama. Some relatives of the Menendez family have criticized the show, accusing it of being a "grotesque shockadrama" that sensationalized the tragedy. Show creator Ryan Murphy defended the series, calling the backlash from the family "predictable at best."

 

Adding fuel to the debate, reality TV star Kim Kardashian has publicly voiced her support for the Menendez brothers, describing them as "kind, intelligent, honest men" in an article for NBC News. Kardashian’s endorsement has further stoked popular interest in the brothers’ case, as both supporters and critics weigh in on whether the brothers’ sentences should be reconsidered.

 

As the case prepares to be revisited, the question of whether the Menendez brothers were driven by greed or acted out of fear and trauma continues to captivate the public imagination.

 

 

Based on a report from BBC 2024-10-07

 

 

 

[giddyup]

Killed both parents with a shotgun while they were sitting on a couch, that's self defence? All the testimony of supposed sexual abuse only came out at trial. There was never any mention of it until then. After killing both parents they then went on a huge spending spree. They were a couple of rich, spoiled, entitled brats. Should never get out.

[PAWNEESE]

I understand their 'excuse' is now ...  sexual assault by their father. 

 

BUT .... they also brutally killed their mother !

 

Both killings were with a huge number of shots to the head .. with a pause for reloading. They give no reason / excuse for her murder. 

 

It was not a momementary sudden loss of control.

 

I think they have done sufficient years .. but the law in the USA is that life can mean life.

 

I am not sure why I felt the need to comment but hey ho it is a forum to get these things off your chest.   A very sad event for all involved / effected ....

 

There are some people now offering evidence the father sexually assaulted them (the new witnesses).

 

So commute the penalty for his murder to time served.

 

But keep the life sentence for the killing of their poor mother. 

 

After the deed they showed no upset (till charged) and had been soon spending extravagantly.

Edited 2 hours ago by PAWNEESE