15 hours ago, rasg said:

I decided to stay out of this thread because most of what has been said is pure nonsense but I can’t let this one go.

Two people died on Jan 6th. Ashlie Babit was shot by a Michael Bird who was under no threat whatsoever. She had at least four riot police behind her and was no threat whatsoever.
Roseanne Boyland was beaten to death by the police at the entrance to the tunnel.

If you take a look at the latest CCTV from Jan 6th you can see it for yourself.

 

Rasg, You look at it from the point of view of Babbit. Now, let's look at it from another angle: Think about this: you support the 2nd amendment, you are at home and an angry mob storms your house. Four unarmed guards have given up defending your house. Next, the mob breaks your windows with sticks, one person without a stick climbs through your window. You don't know anything what this person has said or done in the minutes before she tried entering your house. You want to defend your family at all costs, you are stressed, you give a warning that you will shoot, however, that person continues climbing through the window. Next you shoot. I bet you are convinced you did what you had to do and that it was right. Agree?

15 hours ago, rasg said:

That's the most ridiculous thing I have read.

You'll find out exactly how much voter fraud took place in 2020 and IS taking place over the coming weeks,

Wow, ha ha. DO you know what Trump said? Voting by mail was fraudulent by definition. DO you know which state had the most mail voting in 2020? Florida! WHo won Florida? Trump! So, actually, accidentally, this stupid Trump (IQ <100) didn't know the facts and accused the Reps of fraud.

4 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Again, what happened to the animal that shot and killed the poor woman that was trying to pass a barricade?

 

He's a hero on the left now, yes? 

 

You are so dishonest. 

 

Yellowtail, are you (yes you!) an animal in the following situation?
You look at it from the point of view of Babbit. Now, let's look at it from another angle: Think about this: you support the 2nd amendment, you are at home and an angry mob storms your house. Four unarmed guards have given up defending your house. Next, the mob breaks your windows with sticks, one person without a stick climbs through your window. You don't know anything what this person has said or done in the minutes before she tried entering your house. You want to defend your family at all costs, you are stressed, you give a warning that you will shoot, however, that person continues climbing through the window. Next you shoot. I bet you are convinced you did what you had to do and that it was right. Agree?

15 hours ago, rasg said:

That's the most ridiculous thing I have read.

You'll find out exactly how much voter fraud took place in 2020 and IS taking place over the coming weeks,

Talking about ridiculous... 🤣🤣

15 hours ago, rasg said:

That's the most ridiculous thing I have read.

You'll find out exactly how much voter fraud took place in 2020 and IS taking place over the coming weeks,

So many well-know Reps admitted "NO FRAUD" Many courts concluded "NO FRAUD" . Pls inform yourself how Roger Stone already in 2016 designed the "Stop the Steal" campaign, which wasn't activated in 2016, but later in 2020. a Danish documentary reveals his criminal actions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Storm_Foretold

9 minutes ago, Steven55 said:

Yellowtail, are you (yes you!) an animal in the following situation?
You look at it from the point of view of Babbit. Now, let's look at it from another angle: Think about this: you support the 2nd amendment, you are at home and an angry mob storms your house. Four unarmed guards have given up defending your house. Next, the mob breaks your windows with sticks, one person without a stick climbs through your window. You don't know anything what this person has said or done in the minutes before she tried entering your house. You want to defend your family at all costs, you are stressed, you give a warning that you will shoot, however, that person continues climbing through the window. Next you shoot. I bet you are convinced you did what you had to do and that it was right. Agree?

Exactly. These people see no problem when a guy shoots someone for knocking at his door or whatever, because he feels threatened.

 

Yet, how dare a police officer shoot an intruder breaking into the Capitol because he feels congressmen are threatened? 😃

1 minute ago, candide said:

Exactly. These people see no problem when a guy shoots someone for knocking at his door or whatever, because he feels threatened.

 

Yet, how dare a police officer shoot an intruder breaking into the Capitol because he feels congressmen are threatened? 😃

The problem with many people is that they only have the mental skills for 'first-level thinking' (That even applies for Trump: he doesn't see the consequences of his economic plans. He even doesn't see the consequences of his acquired 'immunity' as president (because he wants to prosecute Biden when Trump is president again). He doesn't see the consequences of US protectionism, he doesn't see that the best way to stop immigration is addressing the CAUSE of immigration (poverty in other countries is one of these things; Harris addressed this already!

On 10/19/2024 at 8:52 PM, Yellowtail said:

Involved how? 

 

You mean like Hillary violating campaign laws by hiring a foreign national to work on her campaign? 

 

Or do you mean like Obama taking illegal campaign donations from foreign nationals? 

 

I am against it, you? 

 

Oh, how do you feel about the Biden administration suing Viginia to keep non-citizens on voter rolls, for or against? 

Links?

 

1 hour ago, bubblegum said:

Links?

 

DNC, Clinton campaign agree to Steele dossier funding fine | AP News

Obama 2008 campaign fined $375,000 - POLITICO

DOJ once OK'd law at center of Youngkin voter roll-culling order feds now suing to block | Fox News

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

DNC, Clinton campaign agree to Steele dossier funding fine | AP News

Obama 2008 campaign fined $375,000 - POLITICO

DOJ once OK'd law at center of Youngkin voter roll-culling order feds now suing to block | Fox News

Fox. please!

45 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

Fox. please!

Here go a fox y'all!

 

 

On 10/19/2024 at 1:23 PM, Inderpland said:

Says the person who supports an insurrectionist.

It wasn’t an insurrection.  

24 minutes ago, G_Money said:

It wasn’t an insurrection.  

Of course not!

24 minutes ago, G_Money said:

It wasn’t an insurrection.  

He knows, but like most leftists, he cares nothing about the truth. 

25 minutes ago, G_Money said:

It wasn’t an insurrection.  

See? 

3 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

Of course not!

Look up the definition of insurrection.

 

It will all become crystal clear.

For the benefit and education of the dullest knifes in the kitchen drawer:

 

https://www.britannica.com/topic/insurrection-politics

 

"Insurrection, an organized and usually violent act of revolt or rebellion against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity by a group of its citizens or subjects; also, any act of engaging in such a revolt. "

 

..'an organized..'. Check. Although very poorly, obviously. We are after all talking about mouth breathers here.

..'and usually violent..'. Check.
..'act of revolt or rebellion..'. Check.

..'against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity..'. Check.

..'by a group of its citizens or subjects; also, any act of engaging in such a revolt.' Check.

 

Check mate.

12 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Because you don't care if a jury found Trump liable for sexual assault. 

 

If the victim were your relative, you might feel differently.

Hilarious! E Jean Carroll was a serial accuser of men for rape and couldn’t even remember the month or year it was supposed to have taken place.
 

They even had to change the law so she could bring the case.

8 hours ago, Dan O said:

Why are you posting about this like you have inside knowledge about what actually happened at the Capitol.  You're not even a US citizen are you?

And what has the fact that I am not a US citizen got to do with it? I have watched dozens of videos of went on in the Capital building that day. I have far more knowledge than most.

7 minutes ago, rasg said:

Hilarious! E Jean Carroll was a serial accuser of men for rape and couldn’t even remember the month or year it was supposed to have taken place.
 

They even had to change the law so she could bring the case.

You'll have to provide links for her prior accusations.

 

Note that Ms. Carroll confided about the assault with two other women at the time, and they testified to that at the trial. 

 

6 hours ago, Steven55 said:

Rasg, You look at it from the point of view of Babbit. Now, let's look at it from another angle: Think about this: you support the 2nd amendment, you are at home and an angry mob storms your house. Four unarmed guards have given up defending your house. Next, the mob breaks your windows with sticks, one person without a stick climbs through your window. You don't know anything what this person has said or done in the minutes before she tried entering your house. You want to defend your family at all costs, you are stressed, you give a warning that you will shoot, however, that person continues climbing through the window. Next you shoot. I bet you are convinced you did what you had to do and that it was right. Agree?

No I don't. Have you watched Babit's execution? I have. It was a cold blooded murder.

5 hours ago, Steven55 said:

So many well-know Reps admitted "NO FRAUD" Many courts concluded "NO FRAUD" . Pls inform yourself how Roger Stone already in 2016 designed the "Stop the Steal" campaign, which wasn't activated in 2016, but later in 2020. a Danish documentary reveals his criminal actions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Storm_Foretold

No a single court ruled no fraud. They almost all admitted no standing, which of course is (and was) pure nonsense.

5 hours ago, Steven55 said:

The problem with many people is that they only have the mental skills for 'first-level thinking' (That even applies for Trump: he doesn't see the consequences of his economic plans. He even doesn't see the consequences of his acquired 'immunity' as president (because he wants to prosecute Biden when Trump is president again). He doesn't see the consequences of US protectionism, he doesn't see that the best way to stop immigration is addressing the CAUSE of immigration (poverty in other countries is one of these things; Harris addressed this already!

Harris couldn’t address an envelope.

21 hours ago, rasg said:

I decided to stay out of this thread because most of what has been said is pure nonsense but I can’t let this one go.

Two people died on Jan 6th. Ashlie Babit was shot by a Michael Bird who was under no threat whatsoever. She had at least four riot police behind her and was no threat whatsoever.
Roseanne Boyland was beaten to death by the police at the entrance to the tunnel.

If you take a look at the latest CCTV from Jan 6th you can see it for yourself.

 

Ashli Babbitt was breaking through a barricaded door that was protecting fleeing legislators.

 

If she had been trying to get to Trump, you would have cheered her death.

 

Rosanne Boyland, 34, died of an amphetamine overdose during the attack, rather than, as was initially reported, from injuries sustained from being crushed beneath other rioters.[500] When the crowd of rioters moved from on top of her, she was found dead. Her death was ruled as accidental by the D.C. medical examiner's office. Her mother, Cheryl Boyland, told NBC News: "She was not doing drugs. The only thing they found was her own prescription medicine."

 

Kevin Greeson, 55; and Benjamin Philips, 50, died naturally from coronary heart disease and hypertensive heart disease, respectively.

 

5 minutes ago, rasg said:

No a single court ruled no fraud. They almost all admitted no standing, which of course is (and was) pure nonsense.

You really have no clue when it comes to events concerning Trump. It appears that you simply parrot whatever talking points are sent to you.

 

Could you please spend a little time checking your assertions before you post?

 

Ward v. Jackson (Ariz. Sup. Ct., Maricopa Cnty. Dec. 4, 2020) – The superior court denied relief requested by the plaintiff in an election contest because the plaintiff failed to meet the evidentiary standard necessary for such a contest. First, plaintiff’s evidence failed to show fraud or misconduct—rather, it showed that the duplication process of the presidential election was 99.45% accurate, and that the inaccuracies were caused by human error. Moreover, the plaintiff’s evidence failed to show illegal votes or an erroneous vote count. The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the superior court’s decision on Dec. 8, 2020. The plaintiff filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 11, 2020, and subsequently filed a motion for expedited consideration on the same day. However, the Court denied the motion to expedite on January 11.

 

There's plenty more where that came from.

 

Trump had no evidence, so his fraud cases were thrown out.

11 minutes ago, rasg said:

No I don't. Have you watched Babit's execution? I have. It was a cold blooded murder.

She was breaking through a barricade like a crazy person. Why was she doing that?

On 10/20/2024 at 2:13 AM, still kicking said:

Hang on I am from OZ and I hate Trump 

Doesn't seem to matter from anyone who talks negatively about Harris. They are pretty hardcore you know. Hate-driven fanatics hell bent on sugar-coating Harris and making Trump into the devils himself. 

I am most certain if you said you loved Harris and hated Trump they would be praising you and advertising how other countries foreigners agree with everything about Harris that is spewed out

54 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

For the benefit and education of the dullest knifes in the kitchen drawer:

 

https://www.britannica.com/topic/insurrection-politics

 

"Insurrection, an organized and usually violent act of revolt or rebellion against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity by a group of its citizens or subjects; also, any act of engaging in such a revolt. "

 

..'an organized..'. Check. Although very poorly, obviously. We are after all talking about mouth breathers here.

..'and usually violent..'. Check.
..'act of revolt or rebellion..'. Check.

..'against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity..'. Check.

..'by a group of its citizens or subjects; also, any act of engaging in such a revolt.' Check.

 

Check mate.

Didn’t happen.  Trump was the sitting President.

 

Were they overthrowing Trump?

 

Edited October 21, 20241 yr by G_Money

11 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Didn’t happen.  Trump was the sitting President.

 

Were they overthrowing Trump?

 

It's called an autocoup.

 

It happens once in a while.

31 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

She was breaking through a barricade like a crazy person. Why was she doing that?

You very obviously haven’t watched it.