Boyle's law: Does anyone think that Boyle's law best explains what happened to Kamala?

[GammaGlobulin]

Dear Folks,

 

Political pundits will be discussing Kamala's meltdown for months....maybe....

 

However, there might be a more scientific explanation for her sudden contraction in the polls.

 

I would refer you to the mechanics described by Boyle's law....

 

 

 

Perhaps it was the case that Kamala began with too much gas, at the beginning of the race.

 

Then, she expelled too much gas, before the end of the race.

 

And then, she just imploded like an old bag of wind?

 

What is the famous equation in science which best describes this relationship between pressure and gas in an Open System, a Closed System, and in an Isolated System?

 

It comes from....

 

Boyle's law, of course.

 

 

So you see...

 

In fact, Robert Boyle could have predicted the result of the 2024 Harris candidacy, way back in 1662.

No need for pollsters, if only Robert Boyle had been alive this past year.

 

 

This is what happens when, at room temperature and pressure, in Washington DC, one exerts too much pressure on an old bag of gas.

 

The particles inside the bag begin to vibrate.

 

And then the bag begins to expel gas.

 

And then the bag of gas completely implodes.

 

You can see this just by close examination of the graph, above.

 

Pressure is inversely proportional to the volume of IQ.

 

Put another way....

 

Too many leaks in the gas bag will lead to implosion of the container.

 

But let's not get too scientific this morning.

 

Regards,

Gamma

 

 

 

 

Edited 2 hours ago by GammaGlobulin

[NickyLouie]

I think Kamala should have used this when Doug was muff diving those Nannies....

 

 

[gk10012001]

The Democrats for better or worse, for good reasons or bad do keep putting up women candidates.  Remember Geraldine Ferraro back in the 1984 VP candidate?  Then Hillary Clinton Presidential candidate in 2016.  Now Kamala Harris.

[dinsdale]

Harris failed because people saw that she was simply an empty vessel of the Democratic elitist machine and saw through the propaganda pushed by the legacy media. She also failed because of the previous fours years of Biden's and her failures. She said she was going to "turn the page" but the problem was that page was still within the same book. She also lost because people have rejected the radical progressive woke left agenda that has been adopted by the Democrats and pushed by the legacy media. She lost and she lost by a lot. 

Edited 2 hours ago by dinsdale

[GammaGlobulin]

17 minutes ago, NickyLouie said:

I think Kamala should have used this when Doug was muff diving those Nannies....

 

 

 

Most assuredly, when muff diving, proper management of gases and pressure is paramount.

 

[still kicking]

Just now, GammaGlobulin said:

 

Most assuredly, when muff diving, proper management of gases and pressure is paramount.

 

Take your medication and see doctor urgently 

[Hanaguma]

33 minutes ago, NickyLouie said:

I think Kamala should have used this when Doug was muff diving those Nannies....

 

 

Hey now, there is no evidence of this.

 

Unlike the evidence that he was raw dogging the nanny.

 

Today's Joke;

 

Now it is official, Trump has beaten more women than ol' Slugger Doug!

[thaibeachlovers]

33 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

Dear Folks,

 

Political pundits will be discussing Kamala's meltdown for months....maybe....

 

However, there might be a more scientific explanation for her sudden contraction in the polls.

 

I would refer you to the mechanics described by Boyle's law....

 

 

 

Perhaps it was the case that Kamala began with too much gas, at the beginning of the race.

 

Then, she expelled too much gas, before the end of the race.

 

And then, she just imploded like an old bag of wind?

 

What is the famous equation in science which best describes this relationship between pressure and gas in an Open System, a Closed System, and in an Isolated System?

 

It comes from....

 

Boyle's law, of course.

 

 

So you see...

 

In fact, Robert Boyle could have predicted the result of the 2024 Harris candidacy, way back in 1662.

No need for pollsters, if only Robert Boyle had been alive this past year.

 

 

This is what happens when, at room temperature and pressure, in Washington DC, one exerts too much pressure on an old bag of gas.

 

The particles inside the bag begin to vibrate.

 

And then the bag begins to expel gas.

 

And then the bag of gas completely implodes.

 

You can see this just by close examination of the graph, above.

 

Pressure is inversely proportional to the volume of IQ.

 

Put another way....

 

Too many leaks in the gas bag will lead to implosion of the container.

 

But let's not get too scientific this morning.

 

Regards,

Gamma

 

 

 

 

You could have saved your fingers. IMO Harris lost because she was a rotten candidate and was imposed without any sort of election into the campaign.

The only explanation I can find is that Pelosi and the rest of the cabal responsible are morons. I know she is, but as I don't know who else is in the cabal I can only assume they are morons.

[GammaGlobulin]

14 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

imposed without any sort of election into the campaign

 

Correct.

Completely correct.

 

This is the oft forgotten, and most important, corollary of Boyle's law.

 

Elections perform a useful function to stress-test prospective candidates.

 

Without first stress-testing, then failure is often likely.

 

This same phenomenon often rears its ugly head in almost any new venture....as can be witnessed here:

 

Without proper stress-testing....

 

Most birds never get off the ground.

 

And, Kamala, too, never did.

 

Which should have been easily predictable, by those with a science background.

 

 

Edited 1 hour ago by GammaGlobulin

[Lacessit]

Trump sold the message he would stop immigration, and lower living costs. Those were the principal concerns of voters.

 

It remains to be seen if he can stop immigration. One thing for sure, his promise to lower living costs is utter BS.

 

Imposing tariffs on imports is a sure-fire way to raise them.

 

Brace yourselves, Americans. Inflation is coming to visit.

 

 

[Cryingdick]

1 hour ago, gk10012001 said:

The Democrats for better or worse, for good reasons or bad do keep putting up women candidates.  Remember Geraldine Ferraro back in the 1984 VP candidate?  Then Hillary Clinton Presidential candidate in 2016.  Now Kamala Harris.

Ferraro was Mondale's choice. It was the biggest landslide in history. Hillary lost, Kamala got her head handed to her. I am not sure what your point is. 

[Yagoda]

1 hour ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

Most assuredly, when muff diving, proper management of gases and pressure is paramount.

 

Thats a very good point. Avoid big fat country girls who got drunk while eating beans and barbeque is an excellent rule.