Jump to content

Misogynistic Attacks Against Women Surge on Social Media Following Trump’s Election Win


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Elkski said:

I've been thinking we need an upper age limit or mental test for senior voters.   It's good thing humans have a limited lifespan. 

I would be quite happy to take on a mental test, provided people much younger than me do too.

Going by some of the posts I see on ASEAN, IMO quite a few would fail - miserably.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Hawaiian said:

The possibility that vaccines can have harmful side effects is well known.  IMOP, the benefits outweigh the risks involved.

I guess the thing is what was the benefit for healthy young people.

Edited by dinsdale
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

I guess the thing is what was the benefit for healthy young people.

 

A warm fuzzy feeling that they were protecting unhealthy old people but you might want to check how many young people died and their vaccine status. It blows the crap you are spouting out of the water.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 11/13/2024 at 3:41 PM, BruceWayne said:

Calling out wimmin on their nonsense doesn't always count as 'Misogyny'

any more than calling out jews for bombing innocents is 'antisemetic'.

 

Everyone's a victim nowadays.

 

Victim consciousness as a means to gain an advantage is so tiresome.

 

As is tthe 'victime olympics'

eg:

 

"I'm black"

"Well I'm a black woman"

"Well I'm a black lesbian"

"Well I'm a black traans lesbian"

and on and on it goes.....

 

And as for 'reproductive right's those women have a right to keep their legs closed - or insist on a condom" - how insisting everyone else subsidise their babies having their skulls crushed and vacuumed away boggles the mind.

 

What a world!

 

 

The social restraints that once held people back from being rude and impolite have been lifted by the Trump election. Opportunistic bigots and bullies are crawling out from their hiding places.  This is not what a majority of  people who voted for Trump asked for. There will be a backlash once young girls are sexually assaulted and the mothers, grandmothers, wives, sisters and girlfriends of men are attacked. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Elkski said:

I've been thinking we need an upper age limit or mental test for senior voters.   It's good thing humans have a limited lifespan. 

As a senior citizen I'm OK with this.  Provided there is a mental test for ALL voters.  And the test should be ability to respond with rational replies to WHY you choose one candidate or party over the other.  if the answers are unproven garbage from mainstream media no vote for you.  Betting we end up with blocking 80% of the electorate.  OK?

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, jimmybcool said:

As a senior citizen I'm OK with this.  Provided there is a mental test for ALL voters.  And the test should be ability to respond with rational replies to WHY you choose one candidate or party over the other.  if the answers are unproven garbage from mainstream media no vote for you.  Betting we end up with blocking 80% of the electorate.  OK?

 

who gets to decide?

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, pattayasan said:

 

who gets to decide?

AHA.  Someone is getting it. 

 

Just like hate speech.  Who defines it?  Who says what a rational answer is?  Kind of exposes the whole concept of "testing seniors".  Good for one group then all groups get "tested".

 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, jimmybcool said:

AHA.  Someone is getting it. 

 

Just like hate speech.  Who defines it?  Who says what a rational answer is?  Kind of exposes the whole concept of "testing seniors".  Good for one group then all groups get "tested".

 

 

Anyone gets to decide if it's hate speech. If it denigrates minorities then it's hate speech. Many countries have actually legislated against hate speech.

 

Someone in Australia just got a month in the monkey house for a nazi salute. He should feel right at home.

Edited by pattayasan
  • Agree 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Anyone gets to decide if it's hate speech. If it denigrates minorities then it's hate speech. Many countries have actually legislated against hate speech.

 

Someone in Australia just got a month in the monkey house for a nazi salute. He should feel right at home.

 

Yeah that pesky freedom of speech thing.  Some people would be accused of hate speech if they simply said there are only 2 genders.  Never mind that has been the scientific consensus for 1000s of years.  The NEW thought is there are dozens and saying otherwise is hate speech.  Would you jail someone for that? 

 

Twitter was banning people for so called hate speech for discussing the Hunter Biden laptop calling it untrue and hateful.  Ermmmm well it was true.  Any discussion of the side effects of the vaccines was considered hate speech.  Soooooo again who defines hate speech or defines the test for voter rights?

 

Jailing someone for a nazi salute is ridiculous.  is it offensive?  Yes, to most people.  But unless they are advocating doing physical harm laugh at them.  Seems people today think feeling offended equates to hate speech.  No one has the right to go through life without being offended.  Some groups today convert "feeling offended" into "being threatened".  And expect society to make it stop.  That is tyranny. 

 

On the original point who defines who gets to vote?  What is the testing procedure?  Will it be applied to all ages groups? 

 

Won't be here for your response.  Sorry got a tee time and have to go.  Cheers.

 

  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, jimmybcool said:

 

Yeah that pesky freedom of speech thing.  Some people would be accused of hate speech if they simply said there are only 2 genders.  Never mind that has been the scientific consensus for 1000s of years.  The NEW thought is there are dozens and saying otherwise is hate speech.  Would you jail someone for that? 

 

Twitter was banning people for so called hate speech for discussing the Hunter Biden laptop calling it untrue and hateful.  Ermmmm well it was true.  Any discussion of the side effects of the vaccines was considered hate speech.  Soooooo again who defines hate speech or defines the test for voter rights?

 

Jailing someone for a nazi salute is ridiculous.  is it offensive?  Yes, to most people.  But unless they are advocating doing physical harm laugh at them.  Seems people today think feeling offended equates to hate speech.  No one has the right to go through life without being offended.  Some groups today convert "feeling offended" into "being threatened".  And expect society to make it stop.  That is tyranny. 

 

On the original point who defines who gets to vote?  What is the testing procedure?  Will it be applied to all ages groups? 

 

Won't be here for your response.  Sorry got a tee time and have to go.  Cheers.

 

 

They wouldn't be calling it hate speech if you said there were only two genders in Australia but they would be ridiculing you for being a religious nut job.

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, jimmybcool said:

 

Yeah that pesky freedom of speech thing.  Some people would be accused of hate speech if they simply said there are only 2 genders.  Never mind that has been the scientific consensus for 1000s of years.  The NEW thought is there are dozens and saying otherwise is hate speech.  Would you jail someone for that? 

 

Twitter was banning people for so called hate speech for discussing the Hunter Biden laptop calling it untrue and hateful.  Ermmmm well it was true.  Any discussion of the side effects of the vaccines was considered hate speech.  Soooooo again who defines hate speech or defines the test for voter rights?

 

Jailing someone for a nazi salute is ridiculous.  is it offensive?  Yes, to most people.  But unless they are advocating doing physical harm laugh at them.  Seems people today think feeling offended equates to hate speech.  No one has the right to go through life without being offended.  Some groups today convert "feeling offended" into "being threatened".  And expect society to make it stop.  That is tyranny. 

 

On the original point who defines who gets to vote?  What is the testing procedure?  Will it be applied to all ages groups? 

 

Won't be here for your response.  Sorry got a tee time and have to go.  Cheers.

 

 

Everyone has the right to go through life without being offended by morons who have no business or need to offend them but only do it to cause offense, like ALL hate speech, including nazi salutes.

 

Edited by pattayasan
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, jimmybcool said:

 

Yeah that pesky freedom of speech thing.  Some people would be accused of hate speech if they simply said there are only 2 genders.  Never mind that has been the scientific consensus for 1000s of years.  The NEW thought is there are dozens and saying otherwise is hate speech.  Would you jail someone for that? 

 

Twitter was banning people for so called hate speech for discussing the Hunter Biden laptop calling it untrue and hateful.  Ermmmm well it was true.  Any discussion of the side effects of the vaccines was considered hate speech.  Soooooo again who defines hate speech or defines the test for voter rights?

 

Jailing someone for a nazi salute is ridiculous.  is it offensive?  Yes, to most people.  But unless they are advocating doing physical harm laugh at them.  Seems people today think feeling offended equates to hate speech.  No one has the right to go through life without being offended.  Some groups today convert "feeling offended" into "being threatened".  And expect society to make it stop.  That is tyranny. 

 

On the original point who defines who gets to vote?  What is the testing procedure?  Will it be applied to all ages groups? 

 

Won't be here for your response.  Sorry got a tee time and have to go.  Cheers.

 

Try doing the Nazi salute in Germany

Giving the Nazi salute in Germany could result in a six-month prison sentence.

Edited by still kicking
  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Everyone has the right to go through life without being offended by morons who have no business or need to offend them but only do it to cause offense, like ALL hate speech, including nazi salutes.

 

 

   You cannot go through life without getting upset or offended by anything .

   You just need to learn to live with it 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   You cannot go through life without getting upset or offended by anything .

   You just need to learn to live with it 

 

Nope, morons in my country need to learn what happens when they hate on others for their minority status.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, FritsSikkink said:

Not surprising, all the silent racists and other creeps feel more supported to out their real feelings. 

 

  You have offended me by calling me a creep and a racist 

Call the police and arrest this poster and put him in jail.

I am really upset 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, FritsSikkink said:

Not surprising, all the silent racists and other creeps feel more supported to out their real feelings. 

 

Indeed, Trump has emboldened the nazis, misogynists and, incels and other misfits who want to make society suffer for their own inadequacies.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Indeed, Trump has emboldened the nazis, misogynists and, incels and other misfits who want to make society suffer for their own inadequacies.

 

   Terrible that you are saying that the minority incels are missfits and inadequate

That's offensive and you should be jailed .,

Call the police 

 

  • Sad 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

What's that got to do with Trump making it easier for incels to hate on women?

 

   Can you give some examples of incels hating on woman ?

Seems like you yourself are hating on Trump supporters and incels 

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Can you give some examples of incels hating on woman ?

Seems like you yourself are hating on Trump supporters and incels 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-44053828

 

Incels have been connected to hate crimes against women and celebrate attacks that target them. Despite the link between incels and violence, public figures like Jordan Peterson defend incels and see them as unfairly marginalized.

 

https://theconversation.com/yes-the-incel-community-has-a-sexism-problem-but-we-can-do-something-about-it-207206

 

In an interview with Tom away from the group, he admits there "may be some elements of misogyny" in the community but says it's all in reaction to women rejecting them.

 

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/the-feed/article/the-hidden-world-of-incel-men-who-hate-women-normalise-violence-and-joke-about-rape/zt0x2un0p

Edited by pattayasan
  • Agree 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-44053828

 

Incels have been connected to hate crimes against women and celebrate attacks that target them. Despite the link between incels and violence, public figures like Jordan Peterson defend incels and see them as unfairly marginalized.

 

https://theconversation.com/yes-the-incel-community-has-a-sexism-problem-but-we-can-do-something-about-it-207206

 

In an interview with Tom away from the group, he admits there "may be some elements of misogyny" in the community but says it's all in reaction to women rejecting them.

 

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/the-feed/article/the-hidden-world-of-incel-men-who-hate-women-normalise-violence-and-joke-about-rape/zt0x2un0p

 

   Those stories are from when Joe Biden was POTUS , how has Trump made it easier for them ?

  • Confused 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Those stories are from when Joe Biden was POTUS , how has Trump made it easier for them ?

 

By normalizing hate speech.

 

They're eating the dogs.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

By normalizing hate speech.

 

They're eating the dogs.

 

   Right, so Donald Trump stated that Haitians are eating dogs and that has caused Incels to attack woman ?

   OK .

I cannot see the connection myself

  • Confused 1
Posted

It's pretty logical.

Conservatives have been insulted non-stop by the woke mob.

This sh/t has been going on for years.

Now the times they are a changing, you know...

As written in the bible:

"For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind."

Fair Play.

  • Confused 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member





×
×
  • Create New...