Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If true, this demonstration by Ukraine of how far it can reach operationally must be of concern to the Kremlin.

 

Frigates cost hundreds of millions of dollars, getting sunk or damaged by something at a fraction of the cost, does not do the Russian economy much good.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
8 hours ago, frank83628 said:

nothing on RT about it

So you're saying it didn't happen? 

  • Haha 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, stevenl said:

So you're saying it didn't happen? 

No,  but nothing on there to back up the claim, they normally have their version of events. No report would suggest BS

 

24 minutes ago, 3NUMBAS said:

Now banned in many places for propaganda

Banned by western cuntries because they only want their propaganda broadcasting 

  • Sad 4
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

It seems to be purely speculation with no evidence to substantiate it!

From the report quoted above "The port highly likely hosted multiple Russian Navy vessels at the time, with at least two likely Gepard-Class frigates sustaining damage," the ministry said.

  • Sad 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

It seems to be purely speculation with no evidence to substantiate it!

From the report quoted above "The port highly likely hosted multiple Russian Navy vessels at the time, with at least two likely Gepard-Class frigates sustaining damage," the ministry said.

The Caspian Fleet only has two frigtaes in it.  So BOTH were hit?  and damaged?  Good shootign!  The design of the Tatarstan is nearly 30 years old, though the more modern Degetsam is some ten years younger so may have some improved technology.  But still...

 

PH

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...